iToXiiC — CS2 Stats

DE76561198202767775[U:1:242502047]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,431Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,389Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPassive Rifler

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	44.1%	44.2%	44.9%	meets
Shot accuracy	17.2%	11.2%	11.8%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.15	1.04	1.04	above
Match win rate	47.0%	45.3%	45.3%	above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 6 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67

Positioning45

Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–50–8Last 10042%Win rateLLWWWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7

Aggression3.9

Utility6.7

Positioning4.5

Opening Duels0.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7

Positioning4.5

Utility6.7

Mechanics5.5

Opening Duels0.9

Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time581ms−12ms

first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms

Headshot accuracy18.2%−1.1%

first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — cache 13–5

13–0Biggest win — shelter

4Longest win streak

L2Current streak

4–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 78% over 9mirageWeakest map · 9% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	22	10–12	45%	0.02
mirage	D	11	1–10	9%	-0.01
ancient	B	11	5–6	45%	0.02
anubis	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.02
nuke	S	9	7–2	78%	0.03
dust2	C	8	3–5	38%	0.01
inferno	A	7	4–3	57%	0.01
vertigo	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.01
shelter	A	5	3–2	60%	0.01
train	—	4	1–3	25%	0.01
fachwerk	—	3	1–2	33%	0.04
boulder	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.02
overpass	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (9% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

108,535Lifetime kills

1.15K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players

6,319Matches

47.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players

44.1%Headshot %

17.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players

13,307MVPs

2,315Hours (in match)

8,452Bombs planted

1,825Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,717

M4A4 / M4A1-S16,885

AWP10,166

P2000 / USP-S7,126

Desert Eagle5,029

Glock-183,927

Five-SeveN3,070

P2502,873

P902,386

SSG 082,330

Lifetime map wins

8,688inferno

6,543dust2

2,669cbble

2,516nuke

1,916train

1,647vertigo

334bank

273lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

553Matches

51%Win rate

1.41Avg K/D

—ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	3	67%	0.97	13.0
Nuke	2	50%	1.28	14.0
Inferno	1	0%	1.07	15.0
Vertigo	1	0%	0.80	12.0
Ancient	1	0%	0.53	9.0
Anubis	1	100%	2.12	17.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy

34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.4%Spray accuracy

74.6%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

583msReaction time

28.1%T opening success

37.5%CT opening success

0.67Enemies flashed / flash

7.9%Flash assists

11.46HE damage / grenade

9.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.0859% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

9% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	6–13	0.00	10%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–16	0.01	23%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	13%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.05	13%	28 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.01	24%	26 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.02	14%	26 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.09	20%	26 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	7%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.03	11%	21 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.03	8%	15 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.00	8%	15 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	17%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.06	17%	19 Jul →
inferno	16–13	0.06	26%	19 Jul →
anubis	15–15	0.04	15%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.01	9%	18 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.01	9%	18 Jul →
anubis	1–13	-0.06	19%	18 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	10%	18 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.14	26%	18 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	23%	18 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.03	3%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.07	22%	15 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.02	21%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.03	31%	15 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	27%	15 Jul →
anubis	13–4	-0.05	20%	15 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.00	21%	12 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.13	34%	12 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.02	15%	12 Jul →
shelter	13–0	0.10	36%	12 Jul →
shelter	4–13	-0.08	24%	12 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.09	25%	11 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.02	31%	11 Jul →
fachwerk	13–11	0.06	16%	11 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	19%	11 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.02	10%	11 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.04	33%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.03	12%	11 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	16%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	20%	11 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.03	24%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.07	21%	10 Jul →
shelter	8–13	-0.08	24%	10 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.03	23%	10 Jul →
shelter	13–7	0.03	36%	10 Jul →
fachwerk	4–13	0.02	10%	10 Jul →
boulder	13–8	-0.01	18%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	24%	10 Jul →
shelter	13–6	0.06	18%	9 Jul →
fachwerk	12–12	0.03	14%	9 Jul →
boulder	9–13	-0.03	27%	9 Jul →
train	9–13	0.06	15%	6 Jul →
overpass	7–13	-0.03	24%	5 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.07	22%	5 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.05	17%	2 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.04	26%	2 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.01	16%	2 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.04	13%	2 Jul →
anubis	12–12	-0.04	16%	2 Jul →
dust2	11–4	0.06	25%	2 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.00	27%	1 Jul →
vertigo	13–7	-0.04	11%	1 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	14%	1 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.06	13%	25 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.03	20%	25 Jun →
inferno	13–3	0.01	18%	25 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.08	14%	25 Jun →
train	5–13	-0.02	17%	25 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	10%	25 Jun →
cache	9–13	0.01	21%	25 Jun →
cache	6–13	0.06	23%	24 Jun →
vertigo	7–13	-0.06	25%	24 Jun →
train	6–13	-0.02	29%	24 Jun →
nuke	13–1	0.14	24%	16 Jun →
cache	13–5	0.14	18%	16 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.07	33%	16 Jun →
inferno	12–12	-0.03	14%	14 Jun →
nuke	13–2	0.06	20%	14 Jun →
cache	13–3	-0.03	21%	14 Jun →
dust2	12–12	-0.06	23%	14 Jun →
cache	9–13	-0.00	19%	13 Jun →
train	13–5	0.02	24%	13 Jun →
ancient	5–13	-0.02	11%	13 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	17%	13 Jun →
vertigo	9–13	-0.00	16%	13 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.05	19%	13 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.02	13%	12 Jun →
inferno	13–2	0.06	7%	12 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.00	8%	12 Jun →
nuke	11–4	0.01	21%	12 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	18%	12 Jun →
vertigo	7–13	-0.04	32%	3 Jun →
vertigo	12–12	-0.01	19%	3 Jun →
vertigo	13–10	0.08	22%	2 Jun →
overpass	12–12	0.00	24%	2 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.04	12%	1 Jun →
anubis	13–3	-0.03	31%	1 Jun →
anubis	5–13	-0.03	18%	1 Jun →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	17%	25 May →