raad

raad — CS2 Stats

76561198201209225[U:1:240943497]Steam profile ↗

699Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,200Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,671Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13600 of 46228 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,711), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate52.1%42.7%44.0%above
Shot accuracy17.4%10.8%11.6%above
Kill/death ratio1.301.001.03above
Match win rate50.3%44.1%45.1%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 5 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGraadFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER21,671 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning53
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48448Last 10048%Win rateLTWWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression8.6
Utility4.8
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 685ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.3
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time691ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 674ms → last ⅓ avg 691ms
Headshot accuracy28.5%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 30.3% → last ⅓ avg 28.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — italy 13–5
130Biggest win — cache
3Longest win streak
61In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 57% over 14nukeWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB38182047%0.03
dust2A148657%0.02
mirageB115645%-0.01
nukeC83538%0.03
poseidon42250%0.07
alpine41325%0.01
office43175%0.02
inferno42250%-0.05
vertigo32167%0.10
warden32167%-0.05
ancient2020%-0.01
italy21150%0.14
overpass1010%-0.03
anubis110100%-0.04
stronghold1010%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

78,476Lifetime kills
1.30K/D · Top 10% of Level 4 players
3,326Matches
50.3%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 4 players
52.1%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
17.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 4 players
12,193MVPs
1,200Hours (in match)
1,729Bombs planted
786Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP20,162
AK-4715,540
Tec-91,794
SSG 081,666
MP91,465

Lifetime map wins

7,919dust2
2,410nuke
2,349inferno
1,154cbble
838vertigo
812train
397office
163lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.0%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
78.7%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
685msReaction time
45.5%T opening success
49.5%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
5.98HE damage / grenade
8.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.0316%8 Jul
poseidon8–80.1427%22 Jun
dust213–60.1436%7 Jun
dust213–60.0533%7 Jun
alpine10–130.0329%30 May
cache13–110.0640%30 May
dust213–9-0.0220%26 May
cache10–130.0429%14 May
cache13–90.0322%12 May
cache13–60.1228%12 May
mirage4–13-0.0144%12 May
cache13–11-0.0232%12 May
poseidon9–70.1233%12 May
cache10–130.0140%12 May
dust213–50.0727%12 May
nuke5–13-0.0553%12 May
vertigo13–90.1332%11 May
cache10–130.1017%11 May
office13–90.0036%11 May
alpine13–3-0.0228%11 May
dust25–13-0.0416%11 May
nuke4–13-0.0329%11 May
ancient0–2-0.010%11 May
overpass15–15-0.0330%11 May
cache2–13-0.0536%10 May
warden13–4-0.0723%10 May
mirage13–9-0.0736%9 May
cache7–130.0330%9 May
cache13–70.0119%8 May
cache7–130.0630%8 May
anubis13–6-0.0413%7 May
nuke13–110.0120%7 May
mirage13–6-0.0636%7 May
dust28–130.0221%7 May
mirage9–13-0.0216%7 May
cache13–9-0.0433%7 May
cache10–130.0525%7 May
mirage13–60.0317%6 May
mirage9–130.0324%6 May
dust213–80.0344%6 May
cache13–90.1318%5 May
cache13–100.1522%5 May
cache8–130.0026%4 May
cache13–60.0923%3 May
inferno13–90.0419%3 May
nuke12–120.0921%3 May
office12–12-0.0529%3 May
warden13–8-0.0727%3 May
cache12–12-0.0242%3 May
dust26–13-0.0524%3 May
cache13–110.1825%3 May
cache13–80.1726%3 May
nuke9–40.1141%3 May
nuke3–130.0127%3 May
mirage13–11-0.0130%3 May
cache13–70.0316%2 May
cache8–13-0.0333%2 May
cache5–13-0.0722%2 May
poseidon9–4-0.0831%2 May
inferno2–9-0.1717%2 May
cache10–13-0.0438%2 May
cache5–130.1135%2 May
cache6–130.0231%2 May
cache13–70.0318%2 May
cache13–4-0.0425%1 May
cache13–00.0530%1 May
cache9–13-0.0431%30 Apr
cache2–13-0.0562%30 Apr
cache5–13-0.0242%30 Apr
cache13–9-0.0644%30 Apr
cache12–12-0.0536%30 Apr
cache13–60.1144%30 Apr
cache9–130.0130%29 Apr
cache13–4-0.0533%29 Apr
cache3–13-0.027%29 Apr
poseidon8–80.1128%28 Apr
dust213–60.1146%28 Apr
vertigo6–130.0541%28 Apr
nuke13–30.0637%28 Apr
alpine10–13-0.0130%27 Apr
italy13–50.2332%27 Apr
dust27–130.0029%27 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0115%27 Apr
dust25–13-0.0717%27 Apr
nuke8–130.0229%26 Apr
dust213–160.0340%26 Apr
dust213–60.0521%26 Apr
mirage13–50.1733%26 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0111%25 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0738%25 Apr
office13–30.1319%25 Apr
alpine3–130.0328%25 Apr
office13–100.0118%25 Apr
stronghold8–130.1616%25 Apr
vertigo13–50.138%25 Apr
italy9–130.0421%25 Apr
warden12–12-0.0034%25 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0943%24 Apr
dust213–100.0341%24 Apr
inferno13–70.0324%23 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →