seanbud — CS2 Stats

76561198194465307[U:1:234199579]✓ No bans

839Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,630Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.4 Developing
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=607), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate48.3%42.1%42.5%above
Shot accuracy17.9%12.1%10.9%above
Kill/death ratio0.790.990.990.20 short
Match win rate41.1%43.9%44.2%3.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGseanbudFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning58
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY444412Last 10044%Win rateWWLWWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.5
Aggression7.4
Utility5.5
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning5.8
Utility5.5
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time598ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms
Headshot accuracy14.8%−6.2%
first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–9
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 5mirageWeakest map · 36% over 36
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B49262353%0.00
mirageC36132336%0.00
ancientA53260%-0.01
inferno4040%-0.04
nuke31233%0.02
overpass1010%-0.02
train1010%0.01
palacio110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 36). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

165,964Lifetime kills
0.79K/D
5,904Matches
41.1%Match win rate
48.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 3 players
17.9%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 3 players
13,127MVPs
4,630Hours (in match)
3,434Bombs planted
1,196Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4762,353
AWP22,353
P2504,464
UMP-453,850
SSG 083,774
FAMAS2,496

Lifetime map wins

16,875dust2
7,404inferno
756train
720nuke
660cbble
399vertigo
99office
40lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.6%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.4%Spray accuracy
75.2%Counter-strafing
12.2°Preaim
591msReaction time
33.7%T opening success
56.9%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
10.6%Flash assists
8.08HE damage / grenade
8.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.1542° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.6014% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 36 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–5-0.0121%25 Mar
dust213–60.013%26 Feb
dust210–13-0.0022%22 Feb
ancient13–9-0.029%22 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0016%3 Feb
dust29–13-0.0318%3 Feb
mirage13–16-0.0411%29 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0122%29 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0420%27 Jan
overpass9–13-0.0216%27 Jan
mirage13–60.0113%27 Jan
dust210–130.0215%27 Jan
ancient13–110.049%27 Jan
dust216–13-0.0110%26 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0112%25 Jan
mirage8–130.0021%24 Jan
mirage15–150.0718%24 Jan
mirage13–80.1015%24 Jan
mirage12–120.0613%19 Jan
dust213–50.020%19 Jan
dust213–90.0712%19 Jan
dust213–80.0416%19 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0615%18 Jan
dust27–13-0.086%18 Jan
train7–130.0112%18 Jan
ancient8–130.0211%18 Jan
dust29–13-0.0316%15 Jan
mirage13–90.1432%15 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0119%15 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0813%14 Jan
nuke5–130.0425%14 Jan
palacio13–70.065%13 Jan
dust26–13-0.0322%13 Jan
mirage1–13-0.0322%11 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0119%11 Jan
dust216–120.0114%6 Jan
dust27–130.0123%6 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0227%6 Jan
mirage11–130.0524%26 Dec
mirage11–130.0119%26 Dec
mirage12–12-0.0224%26 Dec
inferno11–13-0.0321%22 Dec
dust211–3-0.0445%22 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0031%22 Dec
dust213–10-0.0326%19 Dec
dust29–130.0117%19 Dec
dust211–13-0.0317%19 Dec
dust213–40.0429%19 Dec
mirage13–90.0123%19 Dec
dust27–13-0.0611%19 Dec
dust213–100.0634%19 Dec
dust213–70.0829%19 Dec
ancient6–13-0.0615%15 Dec
nuke13–50.0546%15 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0234%15 Dec
mirage12–12-0.0424%12 Dec
dust213–10-0.0415%8 Dec
mirage12–120.0118%8 Dec
dust25–13-0.0124%6 Dec
dust211–130.0334%5 Dec
dust212–12-0.0119%5 Dec
inferno12–12-0.0311%5 Dec
mirage12–12-0.0116%4 Dec
mirage12–12-0.0020%4 Dec
dust210–50.0622%4 Dec
dust213–100.019%4 Dec
dust211–13-0.0517%4 Dec
dust28–13-0.0418%4 Dec
nuke3–13-0.0126%2 Dec
dust213–10-0.0613%2 Dec
dust212–120.0316%2 Dec
dust29–130.0020%2 Dec
mirage13–11-0.0420%30 Nov
dust213–110.0030%30 Nov
dust26–13-0.0012%29 Nov
dust26–130.0622%26 Nov
mirage13–70.0019%25 Nov
dust213–100.0619%25 Nov
dust29–130.0422%25 Nov
dust213–100.0348%25 Nov
mirage13–100.0223%25 Nov
dust27–130.0326%25 Nov
mirage12–12-0.0411%24 Nov
mirage12–12-0.0222%24 Nov
dust26–130.0126%24 Nov
mirage13–70.0522%24 Nov
dust213–80.0113%21 Nov
dust213–10-0.0712%21 Nov
mirage13–10-0.0121%21 Nov
mirage9–130.0016%20 Nov
mirage7–130.0236%20 Nov
dust211–130.0919%20 Nov
dust213–1-0.027%20 Nov
mirage10–130.0216%20 Nov
dust213–110.0010%20 Nov
dust213–6-0.053%20 Nov
dust213–2-0.0530%20 Nov
dust213–40.0127%20 Nov
mirage13–11-0.0317%19 Nov
mirage4–13-0.0250%16 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →