OnomYoyo

OnomYoyo — CS2 Stats

JP76561198189338802[U:1:229073074]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,597Tracked matches56%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,312Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating11,865Blue band · top ~45% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#29277 of 42347 tracked
FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 1 among CSDB-tracked players (n=230), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 1 medianLevel 2 medianvs Level 2
Headshot rate36.2%41.1%41.2%4.9% short
Shot accuracy12.4%14.1%12.5%meets
Kill/death ratio0.830.970.960.13 short
Match win rate42.9%41.9%42.8%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 2 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 2 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOnomYoyoFACEITLevel 1STANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedPREMIER11,865 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning54
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45478Last 10045%Win rateLWLWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression6.8
Utility4.0
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 646ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.4
Utility4.0
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact6.9

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time637ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 637ms
Headshot accuracy14.5%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 14.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — cache 10–0
131Biggest win — nuke
4Longest win streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 20ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB26131350%-0.01
mirageA2012860%-0.01
dust2C135838%-0.00
infernoC104640%-0.01
nukeA95456%0.02
ancientD72529%-0.01
anubisD72529%0.00
overpass4040%-0.02
office21150%0.04
eldorado110100%0.14
vertigo1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

48,901Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
3,428Matches
42.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 1 players
36.2%Headshot %
12.4%Shot accuracy
6,418MVPs
1,161Hours (in match)
2,615Bombs planted
619Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,974dust2
4,118inferno
2,844vertigo
1,969nuke
1,525office
729train
368cbble
93lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

39Matches
41%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
77.3ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis10%0.7414.0
Dust21100%0.8113.0
Mirage10%0.5916.0
Nuke1100%1.6213.0
Vertigo1100%0.6813.0
Ancient1100%1.2728.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.9%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
646msReaction time
32.1%T opening success
48.1%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
2.0%Flash assists
9.52HE damage / grenade
3.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.3875% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.091 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.0605% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–130.0116%29 Aug
mirage13–70.0011%29 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0115%28 Aug
nuke13–110.0611%28 Aug
mirage16–120.0013%27 Aug
cache16–140.0511%27 Aug
ancient13–70.0113%24 Aug
cache14–16-0.0312%22 Aug
dust213–7-0.0413%14 Aug
ancient6–13-0.019%14 Aug
eldorado9–10.1411%14 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0514%14 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0213%13 Aug
nuke15–150.0217%13 Aug
anubis13–70.0828%8 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0411%3 Aug
cache7–13-0.0510%31 Jul
anubis7–130.0016%29 Jul
mirage13–70.0028%28 Jul
dust215–150.0220%28 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0911%28 Jul
ancient11–130.0011%26 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0012%16 Jul
cache16–140.0122%16 Jul
cache11–13-0.038%16 Jul
dust213–70.0723%16 Jul
mirage13–80.0413%16 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0218%15 Jul
nuke13–110.0318%15 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0111%14 Jul
dust215–15-0.017%14 Jul
anubis1–50.0117%14 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0117%13 Jul
dust213–80.0112%13 Jul
cache10–00.145%13 Jul
cache13–8-0.0521%9 Jul
cache7–13-0.0812%9 Jul
cache9–130.0115%9 Jul
cache13–4-0.009%9 Jul
vertigo1–13-0.0712%7 Jul
cache13–60.1011%7 Jul
cache13–100.1218%7 Jul
office11–13-0.0127%1 Jul
mirage5–13-0.1116%1 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0112%30 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0419%30 Jun
nuke13–4-0.0215%26 Jun
inferno16–130.1014%26 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0724%26 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0418%26 Jun
dust213–9-0.039%25 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0313%17 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0320%17 Jun
cache8–13-0.1625%16 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0217%16 Jun
inferno13–80.0021%12 Jun
dust213–50.0221%12 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0030%12 Jun
dust210–130.0815%11 Jun
mirage15–150.0318%9 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0311%9 Jun
anubis7–130.0411%4 Jun
overpass12–160.0716%4 Jun
nuke13–60.0412%1 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0324%1 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0014%31 May
nuke13–10.0810%31 May
office13–60.1025%31 May
mirage13–110.0521%28 May
dust210–130.0112%27 May
mirage8–13-0.0817%20 May
dust27–13-0.0319%20 May
mirage13–8-0.0116%20 May
nuke9–13-0.025%19 May
cache12–12-0.0210%19 May
overpass7–13-0.0310%18 May
cache1–7-0.014%18 May
cache13–7-0.0310%18 May
cache13–8-0.055%17 May
anubis13–2-0.0211%17 May
inferno4–13-0.038%14 May
dust211–13-0.0612%14 May
nuke10–13-0.0014%13 May
cache11–13-0.0214%13 May
cache6–13-0.0315%12 May
cache0–13-0.0314%12 May
cache13–110.0714%10 May
cache13–2-0.0315%10 May
cache2–13-0.0914%10 May
anubis7–13-0.0613%7 May
mirage13–50.0019%7 May
anubis6–13-0.0316%7 May
mirage13–6-0.0220%29 Apr
inferno10–13-0.033%29 Apr
cache7–13-0.026%29 Apr
cache13–6-0.0624%29 Apr
cache13–90.055%28 Apr
inferno11–130.0012%27 Apr
dust26–13-0.0715%20 Apr
dust210–13-0.0217%20 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →