floppy_eggos — CS2 Stats

76561198189093047[U:1:228827319]

1,977Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,320Purple band · top ~11.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#13403 of 29727 tracked

FaceitLevel 5 · 1,706 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova III

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning58

Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49–47–4Last 10049%Win rateLLLWLTLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9

Aggression5.8

Utility4.1

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning5.8

Utility4.1

Mechanics8.4

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time576ms−21ms

first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms

Headshot accuracy18.8%−0.0%

first ⅓ avg 18.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — cache 13–7

13–2Biggest win — ancient

6Longest win streak

L3Current streak

10–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 79% over 19nukeWeakest map · 14% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	24	10–14	42%	0.01
cache	S	19	15–4	79%	0.02
mirage	B	15	8–7	53%	0.01
ancient	A	14	8–6	57%	-0.00
anubis	D	11	3–8	27%	-0.01
inferno	C	7	3–4	43%	0.00
nuke	D	7	1–6	14%	0.01
vertigo	—	3	1–2	33%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

898Matches

50%Win rate

1.09Avg K/D

82.6ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	103	51%	1.04	17.3
Dust2	93	47%	1.14	17.3
Ancient	52	65%	1.04	17.2
Anubis	29	48%	1.08	17.4
Inferno	28	46%	1.07	15.8
Cache	24	29%	1.04	16.2
Nuke	21	43%	1.07	15.9
Overpass	15	40%	1.14	18.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy

36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.7%Spray accuracy

87.6%Counter-strafing

10.0°Preaim

575msReaction time

33.6%T opening success

48.1%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

5.4%Flash assists

9.60HE damage / grenade

6.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4896 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.6335% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	14–16	-0.06	19%	29 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.03	28%	29 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.01	27%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.04	17%	26 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.09	9%	26 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.02	35%	26 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.04	19%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.03	18%	25 Aug →
anubis	1–13	-0.03	26%	25 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.00	11%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.08	22%	23 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	0.04	13%	23 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.00	24%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.09	17%	22 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	10%	21 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.01	20%	20 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.02	22%	19 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.08	28%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.04	24%	19 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.00	16%	19 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	15%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.06	13%	18 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.12	20%	17 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.09	18%	17 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.01	14%	17 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	22%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.01	17%	17 Aug →
nuke	14–16	0.05	17%	16 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	16%	16 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	4%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.03	22%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.05	21%	16 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.03	16%	16 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	12%	16 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	16%	16 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	7%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.04	24%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.07	20%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–4	-0.03	14%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.05	20%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.05	19%	14 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	19%	13 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.00	21%	13 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	15%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.00	15%	13 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.03	18%	13 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.06	12%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.01	13%	12 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	14%	12 Aug →
vertigo	7–13	-0.02	18%	10 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	15%	7 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	0.03	16%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.03	15%	7 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.06	21%	7 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	19%	6 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.04	21%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	25%	6 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	12%	5 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.06	13%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.02	36%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.02	19%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.05	19%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–2	-0.04	17%	3 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.05	8%	3 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.04	18%	3 Aug →
inferno	2–4	-0.02	13%	3 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.00	25%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.03	18%	2 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.05	22%	2 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.11	18%	2 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.00	26%	2 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	17%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.06	15%	31 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	29%	31 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.02	16%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.02	26%	30 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	25%	27 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.00	22%	26 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	10%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.10	27%	26 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	17%	25 Jul →
anubis	16–19	-0.03	13%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.03	21%	24 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.02	20%	23 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.10	25%	21 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.04	13%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.10	22%	21 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	8%	20 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.01	20%	20 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.04	17%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.03	9%	20 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.08	21%	20 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.15	27%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.02	15%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	18%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.05	20%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	17%	13 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	21%	13 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.03	3%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	23%	13 Jul →