Citizen — CS2 Stats

US76561198187202659[U:1:226936931]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,547Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.0 Developing

Premier CS Rating19,479Purple band · top ~10.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#5298 of 10800 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58

Positioning54

Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–52–3Last 10045%Win rateLWWLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8

Aggression6.6

Utility4.5

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.5

Clutch0.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8

Positioning5.4

Utility4.5

Mechanics4.1

Opening Duels3.1

Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time512ms−22ms

first ⅓ avg 534ms → last ⅓ avg 512ms

Headshot accuracy15.3%−0.3%

first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — ancient 13–6

13–2Biggest win — mirage

4Longest win streak

9–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 56% over 18mirageWeakest map · 38% over 24

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	24	9–15	38%	0.01
ancient	C	19	8–11	42%	0.01
nuke	A	18	10–8	56%	-0.01
cache	B	17	9–8	53%	0.02
dust2	B	13	6–7	46%	-0.00
inferno	C	5	2–3	40%	0.00
anubis	—	4	1–3	25%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

310Matches

50%Win rate

0.96Avg K/D

65.6ADR

34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

21%1v1 clutch win

15%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	14	57%	0.95	13.1
Nuke	5	60%	1.20	14.8
Dust2	4	0%	0.48	9.3
Ancient	3	33%	0.63	10.3
Train	3	33%	0.59	9.7
Anubis	3	67%	0.68	10.7
Vertigo	2	50%	0.94	13.0
Inferno	2	50%	0.35	5.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.9%Headshot accuracy

32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.0%Spray accuracy

68.5%Counter-strafing

10.4°Preaim

502msReaction time

25.9%T opening success

54.4%CT opening success

0.45Enemies flashed / flash

3.4%Flash assists

7.81HE damage / grenade

12.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.8889% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4476 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.8922% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	14–16	0.03	15%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.08	10%	28 Aug →
nuke	3–0	-0.06	100%	28 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	13%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.03	16%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.07	10%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	19%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.02	14%	25 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.10	9%	25 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.04	18%	25 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	11%	24 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.08	5%	24 Aug →
cache	14–16	0.02	13%	23 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.01	2%	23 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.08	11%	22 Aug →
dust2	12–16	-0.00	16%	22 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.03	19%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.07	12%	22 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.02	11%	22 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	14%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.08	24%	22 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.02	11%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	16%	22 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.00	7%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.06	10%	21 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	7%	21 Aug →
mirage	6–3	-0.00	12%	21 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.02	3%	21 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.06	22%	20 Aug →
ancient	16–13	-0.06	10%	19 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	12%	19 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.03	26%	19 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.01	6%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.09	21%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	16%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.05	13%	18 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	13%	18 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	17%	18 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.03	14%	18 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	24%	18 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.01	7%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.11	24%	17 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.06	3%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.02	11%	17 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.00	22%	17 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	8%	16 Aug →
dust2	16–14	-0.03	10%	15 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.00	12%	15 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	15%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.02	13%	12 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.00	21%	12 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	21%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	13%	11 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	14%	11 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.09	15%	11 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	20%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–2	-0.00	15%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.11	17%	7 Aug →
anubis	14–16	-0.03	13%	7 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	16%	7 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.02	41%	6 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	3%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.03	16%	5 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.10	20%	5 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.01	5%	5 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	7%	5 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.05	21%	4 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	18%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.07	19%	4 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	19%	4 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.02	10%	4 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.01	15%	4 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.00	4%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.13	18%	3 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.06	11%	3 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.01	29%	3 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.04	19%	30 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.09	28%	30 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	9%	30 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	4%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	13%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.09	18%	29 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.02	12%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.01	18%	28 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	21%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.04	17%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.00	17%	27 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.00	21%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.01	17%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.07	17%	24 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.03	9%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.08	21%	24 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.01	13%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	12%	21 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.09	31%	20 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.06	4%	20 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.04	10%	18 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	15%	17 Jul →
nuke	14–16	-0.01	8%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.00	14%	15 Jul →