zepflash

zepflash — CS2 Stats

DE76561198182706657[U:1:222440929]Steam profile ↗

393Tracked matches68%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,060Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,711), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate49.4%42.7%44.0%above
Shot accuracy17.4%10.8%11.6%above
Kill/death ratio1.211.001.03above
Match win rate36.8%44.1%45.1%8.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzepflashFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning43
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY493714Last 10049%Win rateWLLLWWTTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression3.1
Utility6.7
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.3
Utility6.7
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time607ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy26.1%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 26.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — dust2 13–0
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 62% over 42dust2Weakest map · 39% over 38
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA42261662%0.04
dust2C38152339%0.05
mirageC2081240%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 38). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

79,112Lifetime kills
1.21K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
3,469Matches
36.8%Match win rate
49.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
17.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 4 players
6,341MVPs
2,039Hours (in match)
2,045Bombs planted
739Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,789dust2
1,862inferno
971cbble
404nuke
324train
90vertigo
38safehouse
34office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

52Matches
62%Win rate
1.65Avg K/D
ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
87.5%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
609msReaction time
33.3%T opening success
26.6%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
8.44HE damage / grenade
9.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.2513% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 38 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–100.0122%19 Aug
dust210–13-0.0828%18 Aug
cache10–130.1019%17 Aug
dust23–130.0142%17 Aug
dust213–11-0.0417%8 Aug
cache13–60.0518%8 Aug
cache12–120.0524%6 Aug
dust212–12-0.0637%5 Aug
cache13–30.0724%5 Aug
cache13–9-0.0121%1 Aug
cache13–7-0.0031%1 Aug
cache13–20.1317%28 Jul
cache2–13-0.0420%28 Jul
cache13–6-0.0235%28 Jul
cache13–80.1031%27 Jul
cache13–10-0.019%27 Jul
cache6–13-0.0237%27 Jul
cache13–40.0822%27 Jul
cache11–130.0618%27 Jul
cache10–13-0.0024%19 Jul
cache13–60.1229%19 Jul
cache13–50.1719%19 Jul
cache13–30.1235%18 Jul
cache13–6-0.0133%18 Jul
cache7–130.0325%18 Jul
cache12–120.0621%16 Jul
cache12–120.0124%16 Jul
cache12–120.0221%15 Jul
cache13–9-0.0319%15 Jul
cache13–10.1240%14 Jul
cache13–70.0243%13 Jul
cache13–80.0230%13 Jul
dust213–90.0427%12 Jul
cache13–30.0520%12 Jul
cache12–12-0.0231%6 Jul
cache13–90.1523%21 May
cache8–00.0724%21 May
cache13–70.0723%19 May
cache13–60.0324%19 May
cache7–130.0336%18 May
cache13–60.0323%18 May
cache13–4-0.0124%1 May
cache13–60.1332%1 May
cache7–130.0214%30 Apr
cache5–130.0424%30 Apr
cache9–130.0046%30 Apr
cache6–130.0422%29 Apr
dust213–110.0229%15 Apr
dust211–13-0.0025%6 Apr
mirage6–20.0333%11 Feb
dust210–130.0127%25 Dec
dust210–130.1032%10 Dec
mirage13–110.1412%23 Nov
mirage4–130.0124%20 Nov
dust212–120.0925%20 Nov
mirage13–20.1423%19 Nov
mirage13–80.0824%18 Nov
mirage12–120.1124%15 Nov
mirage10–130.0519%14 Nov
dust210–130.0128%12 Nov
mirage9–130.0010%12 Nov
dust211–130.0818%12 Nov
dust27–130.0422%11 Nov
mirage9–130.0518%11 Nov
dust213–110.1530%11 Nov
mirage8–130.0426%10 Nov
dust213–110.0914%10 Nov
mirage9–130.0816%10 Nov
dust212–120.0020%9 Nov
dust213–110.0818%9 Nov
dust23–13-0.0327%7 Nov
mirage3–130.0017%7 Nov
dust23–13-0.0029%6 Nov
dust212–12-0.0221%6 Nov
mirage13–100.0720%6 Nov
dust213–80.0718%5 Nov
mirage12–120.1826%5 Nov
dust213–00.2017%5 Nov
dust213–40.0820%4 Nov
mirage7–130.0119%4 Nov
dust24–13-0.0315%3 Nov
dust25–13-0.0321%3 Nov
mirage13–100.1223%1 Nov
dust212–120.0818%1 Nov
dust213–100.1124%1 Nov
dust28–130.0728%31 Oct
dust213–80.1133%31 Oct
dust213–40.1127%31 Oct
dust212–120.0322%30 Oct
dust213–110.1233%30 Oct
mirage8–130.0331%29 Oct
dust29–130.0638%29 Oct
dust29–130.0328%29 Oct
dust211–130.0722%27 Oct
dust212–120.0611%27 Oct
mirage3–130.0315%27 Oct
mirage13–20.0534%26 Oct
dust213–90.0722%26 Oct
mirage13–110.0616%25 Oct
dust213–80.0615%25 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →