Ty burell

Ty burell — CS2 Stats

76561198174927317[U:1:214661589]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

925Tracked matches43%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,781Hours in CS30Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,210Blue band · top ~32.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#31162 of 49372 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,468), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate38.3%41.4%44.2%5.9% short
Shot accuracy10.3%9.0%11.6%1.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.850.971.030.18 short
Match win rate43.9%43.7%45.2%1.3% short

This profile sits below the typical Purple band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTy burellPREMIER14,210 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning40
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44533Last 10044%Win rateLWWLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression5.0
Utility5.1
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels1.5

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.0
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time574ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–7
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 20infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB21111052%0.00
dust2A2012860%-0.01
nukeD1841422%-0.00
anubisB137654%-0.02
ancientD124833%-0.01
cacheB115645%-0.01
infernoD51420%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

54,848Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
2,384Matches
43.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Blue band
38.3%Headshot %
10.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Blue band
4,868MVPs
3,047Hours (in match)
1,844Bombs planted
495Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,256dust2
2,320nuke
1,829inferno
1,809train
1,777cbble
43vertigo
42lake
28office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
589msReaction time
16.3%T opening success
55.8%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
8.11HE damage / grenade
8.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 16.2669% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.0124%29 Aug
mirage13–9-0.078%28 Aug
dust213–1-0.0318%28 Aug
dust28–13-0.098%28 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0122%28 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0319%28 Aug
nuke10–130.0110%27 Aug
mirage13–100.0510%27 Aug
anubis13–10-0.097%27 Aug
dust28–13-0.0522%26 Aug
nuke13–40.0828%26 Aug
dust22–13-0.0432%26 Aug
cache13–10-0.0320%26 Aug
nuke3–130.0216%26 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0830%26 Aug
nuke12–13-0.0121%25 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0512%25 Aug
nuke11–130.0218%25 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0718%25 Aug
anubis13–60.0310%25 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0117%25 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0610%25 Aug
dust29–4-0.0514%24 Aug
dust213–9-0.0717%24 Aug
nuke4–13-0.099%23 Aug
ancient9–130.029%23 Aug
dust213–60.0419%23 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0413%22 Aug
mirage11–130.0221%22 Aug
mirage9–130.0224%22 Aug
cache10–130.0810%21 Aug
mirage13–70.1325%21 Aug
mirage13–60.1016%21 Aug
ancient12–16-0.049%21 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0411%20 Aug
mirage13–80.0117%20 Aug
cache13–8-0.0115%20 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0614%17 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0826%17 Aug
mirage5–130.0138%17 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0414%17 Aug
dust213–90.0123%16 Aug
cache13–11-0.0021%14 Aug
nuke11–130.0615%14 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0122%14 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0517%13 Aug
mirage13–60.0523%13 Aug
cache8–130.0221%13 Aug
dust213–80.0617%13 Aug
anubis13–110.0117%13 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0113%12 Aug
ancient10–130.0419%12 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0821%12 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0517%12 Aug
anubis5–13-0.049%12 Aug
nuke13–160.0432%11 Aug
cache14–16-0.0625%10 Aug
anubis13–30.019%10 Aug
dust29–13-0.0123%9 Aug
ancient15–150.0215%8 Aug
nuke5–13-0.049%8 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0523%8 Aug
dust210–13-0.0413%8 Aug
anubis16–140.078%8 Aug
cache7–13-0.057%7 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0015%7 Aug
ancient13–50.0210%7 Aug
dust29–13-0.0312%7 Aug
dust213–70.0420%7 Aug
dust213–7-0.0319%7 Aug
nuke7–130.0020%6 Aug
dust216–12-0.0917%6 Aug
anubis6–13-0.1129%2 Aug
dust28–13-0.0117%25 Jul
dust213–40.1114%25 Jul
cache6–13-0.0211%25 Jul
nuke13–80.0411%25 Jul
nuke9–130.0219%25 Jul
mirage13–20.0610%25 Jul
anubis13–100.0218%25 Jul
nuke10–130.009%25 Jul
nuke13–90.0518%24 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0415%23 Jul
cache15–15-0.048%23 Jul
anubis4–13-0.018%23 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0317%22 Jul
cache16–12-0.0214%22 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0519%22 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0413%22 Jul
nuke12–16-0.0816%20 Jul
anubis10–13-0.028%20 Jul
ancient13–70.0116%19 Jul
cache16–14-0.008%19 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0019%18 Jul
inferno8–130.049%18 Jul
mirage8–130.0310%17 Jul
dust213–110.0625%17 Jul
dust213–5-0.0327%17 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0315%16 Jul
mirage13–50.0217%16 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →