Tommyツ

Tommyツ — CS2 Stats

DE76561198170758219[U:1:210492491]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

281Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,544Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,660), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate50.5%44.0%44.7%above
Shot accuracy15.3%11.6%11.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.131.031.04above
Match win rate47.0%45.1%45.2%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 6 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTommyツFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning42
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46522Last 10046%Win rateWWLLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim6.9
Aggression5.0
Utility7.6
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.8

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.81 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 623ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.2
Utility7.6
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time627ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — anubis 13–3
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 78% over 9ancientWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C30111937%-0.00
mirageC25101540%-0.01
infernoC167944%-0.01
ancientD93633%-0.01
overpassS97278%0.03
nukeS75271%-0.00
anubis43175%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

67,552Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
2,764Matches
47.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
50.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players
15.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
6,395MVPs
1,628Hours (in match)
2,529Bombs planted
693Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,766
AWP3,735
Tec-92,211
FAMAS1,346
P2501,332

Lifetime map wins

7,287dust2
4,695inferno
2,644nuke
734vertigo
430train
213cbble
101office
81lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
85.9%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
623msReaction time
30.2%T opening success
36.2%CT opening success
0.81Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
14.41HE damage / grenade
16.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.2124% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–90.1420%30 Aug
ancient13–100.1111%29 Aug
dust211–13-0.0411%26 Aug
dust25–13-0.0319%23 Aug
dust214–160.0219%22 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0614%22 Aug
dust213–7-0.0616%22 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0613%22 Aug
mirage1–5-0.1011%22 Aug
dust211–13-0.0530%21 Aug
dust213–7-0.105%21 Aug
dust213–60.0016%21 Aug
dust213–5-0.0614%21 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0320%24 Jun
anubis10–10.018%24 Jun
dust23–13-0.0411%24 Jun
mirage9–130.0926%24 Jun
dust213–110.0326%22 Jun
dust210–13-0.009%20 Jun
mirage2–90.0047%20 Jun
inferno9–130.0128%20 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0320%20 Jun
nuke13–80.0510%19 Jun
dust22–70.0110%19 Jun
dust26–13-0.0120%17 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0211%17 Jun
dust211–130.0024%17 Jun
inferno13–90.0022%14 Jun
anubis13–30.1616%12 Jun
inferno8–130.0029%12 Jun
inferno11–130.0318%12 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0422%10 Jun
overpass16–13-0.0123%10 Jun
anubis13–50.0416%5 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0111%4 Jun
mirage13–40.0415%3 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0229%3 Jun
inferno13–100.0620%31 May
mirage13–6-0.0020%31 May
nuke8–13-0.0120%31 May
inferno16–120.1221%30 May
overpass10–13-0.0231%29 May
inferno4–13-0.0316%29 May
mirage9–130.0325%28 May
nuke13–9-0.0125%27 May
mirage13–10-0.0219%27 May
mirage13–11-0.0114%27 May
dust23–130.0220%27 May
mirage5–13-0.0221%27 May
inferno2–5-0.0514%27 May
dust210–130.0222%27 May
mirage16–140.058%27 May
dust213–110.0717%24 May
inferno7–13-0.1017%23 May
dust22–13-0.0818%14 May
nuke13–40.0617%14 May
ancient5–13-0.0513%12 May
dust29–130.0217%12 May
dust215–150.0427%11 May
mirage6–13-0.0810%11 May
dust213–110.0524%11 May
nuke13–11-0.0313%11 May
dust213–90.1123%11 May
dust213–16-0.0217%11 May
dust26–130.0719%11 May
inferno10–13-0.0823%15 Sept
mirage13–3-0.049%14 Sept
overpass13–30.1222%14 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0121%14 Sept
overpass13–60.0719%13 Sept
inferno13–80.0823%13 Sept
inferno0–13-0.1120%13 Sept
mirage0–13-0.086%4 Sept
nuke4–9-0.0916%4 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0424%3 Sept
overpass13–60.1015%3 Sept
overpass13–90.0322%3 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0014%1 Sept
overpass8–130.0214%1 Sept
dust25–13-0.0919%1 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0817%1 Sept
dust213–110.0325%1 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0115%1 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0319%1 Sept
dust213–11-0.0117%1 Sept
dust211–13-0.0116%31 Aug
overpass13–90.0318%31 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0316%31 Aug
nuke13–100.0231%31 Aug
mirage11–130.0131%30 Aug
dust211–13-0.0218%30 Aug
mirage13–50.1015%27 Aug
mirage0–13-0.110%27 Aug
dust213–10.0710%27 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0322%27 Aug
mirage15–150.0816%24 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0437%24 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0520%24 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0112%24 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0510%24 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →