[GTFKA] dejmon1231

[GTFKA] dejmon1231 — CS2 Stats

SI76561198162518789[U:1:202253061]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

987Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,151Hours in CS47Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,417Purple band · top ~22.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#28811 of 52052 tracked
FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 1 among CSDB-tracked players (n=230), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 1 medianLevel 2 medianvs Level 2
Headshot rate42.0%41.1%41.2%above
Shot accuracy16.2%14.1%12.5%above
Kill/death ratio1.120.970.96above
Match win rate39.3%41.9%42.8%3.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 2 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 2 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG[GTFKA] dejmon1231FACEITLevel 1STANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedPREMIER16,417 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning56
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT46504Last 10046%Win rateWWLWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1
Aggression6.0
Utility2.9
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.6
Utility2.9
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time576ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 13.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — ancient 13–1
131Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
812In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B24111346%0.01
mirageC1981142%0.02
infernoC114736%0.05
ancientA117464%0.04
anubisC114736%0.02
nukeA106460%0.02
vertigoS64267%0.05
cache41325%-0.00
overpass1010%0.06
fachwerk110100%0.07
shelter1010%0.04
train1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

107,770Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 25% of Level 1 players
4,792Matches
39.3%Match win rate
42.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 1 players
16.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 1 players
8,709MVPs
1,851Hours (in match)
3,289Bombs planted
900Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4742,206
AWP9,036
MP73,531
UMP-452,196
FAMAS1,615

Lifetime map wins

5,329dust2
4,291inferno
3,060nuke
1,272vertigo
1,086train
582cbble
381office
112safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

78Matches
41%Win rate
1.34Avg K/D
98.6ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10%1.1120.0
Nuke10%1.2421.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.5%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.4%Spray accuracy
76.5%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
572msReaction time
24.2%T opening success
53.1%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
1.7%Flash assists
6.45HE damage / grenade
4.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.4807% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.2177% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–90.0111%30 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0223%30 Aug
mirage9–130.059%30 Aug
mirage13–60.0214%30 Aug
anubis16–13-0.0213%30 Aug
ancient13–110.0421%29 Aug
inferno13–60.099%29 Aug
dust24–13-0.0418%29 Aug
anubis13–100.0713%29 Aug
mirage13–10.0915%29 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0116%29 Aug
dust213–8-0.008%28 Aug
ancient13–8-0.039%28 Aug
dust211–13-0.0616%28 Aug
nuke13–110.0220%28 Aug
dust213–110.0317%26 Aug
ancient4–130.0126%26 Aug
ancient13–110.0710%26 Aug
dust213–10-0.0220%25 Aug
dust213–30.0216%25 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0316%25 Aug
nuke13–20.0719%25 Aug
inferno10–130.059%25 Aug
dust211–130.0012%25 Aug
cache4–13-0.0019%25 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0111%25 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0313%23 Aug
dust213–80.0213%23 Aug
anubis11–130.0413%23 Aug
mirage7–130.109%23 Aug
nuke16–120.0811%21 Aug
ancient13–70.1021%21 Aug
dust26–130.0520%21 Aug
cache13–110.0325%21 Aug
inferno11–130.0125%20 Aug
dust211–13-0.0618%20 Aug
inferno13–60.1712%19 Aug
nuke13–40.0416%19 Aug
dust214–16-0.0420%19 Aug
dust213–90.0324%18 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0113%18 Aug
dust27–130.0523%18 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0034%18 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0216%17 Aug
dust213–50.0813%17 Aug
mirage13–9-0.019%17 Aug
mirage8–13-0.034%16 Aug
dust213–50.0118%16 Aug
ancient8–130.0018%15 Aug
mirage5–130.0118%15 Aug
nuke13–100.0421%15 Aug
mirage13–90.0821%14 Aug
cache11–13-0.017%14 Aug
dust213–40.0215%14 Aug
anubis13–90.0311%12 Aug
mirage13–30.0928%12 Aug
mirage13–50.0619%12 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0425%10 Aug
dust29–130.0121%9 Aug
mirage13–4-0.024%9 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0212%8 Aug
dust20–13-0.0012%8 Aug
mirage1–10-0.0720%8 Aug
cache14–16-0.0316%6 Aug
anubis13–90.0016%6 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0613%6 Aug
ancient13–10.2611%6 Aug
mirage8–130.0714%4 Aug
ancient7–13-0.1026%4 Aug
ancient2–130.0126%3 Aug
anubis7–130.0921%3 Aug
nuke13–110.0610%3 Aug
anubis13–160.0512%2 Aug
ancient13–60.043%1 Aug
vertigo5–13-0.0615%1 Aug
dust213–40.0011%1 Aug
dust29–130.1111%1 Aug
vertigo13–9-0.018%1 Aug
vertigo13–110.1110%31 Jul
inferno11–130.1415%31 Jul
dust21–13-0.018%31 Jul
inferno13–90.0113%31 Jul
vertigo11–130.059%31 Jul
anubis2–9-0.024%30 Jul
dust23–13-0.069%30 Jul
overpass6–130.068%29 Jul
vertigo13–100.0717%29 Jul
vertigo13–50.1616%29 Jul
fachwerk13–100.0713%28 Jul
mirage12–120.0211%28 Jul
dust25–130.0317%28 Jul
shelter12–120.0420%27 Jul
inferno9–130.0415%27 Jul
train9–130.0314%27 Jul
anubis12–12-0.028%24 Jul
inferno7–130.0619%23 Jul
mirage11–130.047%23 Jul
dust213–10.0215%23 Jul
anubis12–120.006%22 Jul
anubis10–130.0119%22 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →