Jägermeister — CS2 Stats

76561198161045483[U:1:200779755]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,376Tracked matches24%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65

Positioning44

Utility13

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40–53–7Last 10040%Win rateLLLTLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5

Aggression4.7

Utility1.3

Positioning4.4

Opening Duels1.8

Clutch5.2

Excellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 649ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5

Positioning4.4

Utility1.3

Mechanics8.8

Opening Duels1.8

Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time646ms+34ms

first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 646ms

Headshot accuracy19.5%−3.3%

first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — inferno 13–9

13–0Biggest win — nuke

5Longest win streak

L3Current streak

5–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 50% over 8dust2Weakest map · 31% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	C	19	8–11	42%	-0.01
cache	B	19	9–10	47%	0.02
inferno	C	19	7–12	37%	-0.04
dust2	D	13	4–9	31%	-0.01
mirage	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.00
ancient	C	9	4–5	44%	0.00
overpass	B	8	4–4	50%	0.02
anubis	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

41Matches

51%Win rate

1.03Avg K/D

96.3ADR

56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win

8%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	8	38%	1.13	20.0
Nuke	7	71%	0.93	15.3
Dust2	7	14%	0.67	13.4
Inferno	6	67%	1.19	20.5
Anubis	6	50%	0.96	17.0
Ancient	4	50%	1.27	16.8
Train	2	100%	1.40	25.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy

32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.9%Spray accuracy

89.4%Counter-strafing

10.8°Preaim

649msReaction time

32.2%T opening success

42.4%CT opening success

0.16Enemies flashed / flash

5.1%Flash assists

4.53HE damage / grenade

1.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.1589 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.2048% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	11–13	-0.02	11%	30 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.00	19%	30 Aug →
dust2	4–11	-0.11	24%	30 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.05	16%	29 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	21%	29 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.02	27%	28 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	23%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.03	13%	27 Aug →
nuke	3–13	0.05	12%	26 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.05	17%	26 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	26%	30 Jun →
inferno	13–5	-0.08	14%	27 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	30%	27 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.10	19%	27 Jun →
nuke	7–13	0.01	21%	27 Jun →
nuke	4–13	-0.04	15%	27 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.06	15%	20 Jun →
dust2	7–13	0.01	25%	6 Jun →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	12%	6 Jun →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	25%	6 Jun →
cache	7–13	-0.04	29%	6 Jun →
inferno	13–9	-0.08	22%	24 May →
overpass	5–13	0.00	14%	24 May →
dust2	13–7	-0.05	22%	24 May →
cache	9–13	0.02	12%	23 May →
inferno	6–9	-0.01	13%	23 May →
nuke	4–9	-0.18	13%	23 May →
overpass	11–13	-0.03	15%	23 May →
nuke	11–13	0.05	22%	23 May →
anubis	6–13	-0.01	23%	23 May →
overpass	13–2	0.01	29%	23 May →
ancient	13–7	0.04	27%	23 May →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	19%	23 May →
inferno	3–13	-0.06	17%	22 May →
nuke	16–14	-0.05	16%	22 May →
nuke	7–9	-0.03	15%	22 May →
inferno	4–9	-0.06	22%	22 May →
nuke	4–13	-0.08	21%	18 May →
inferno	8–8	-0.14	13%	18 May →
inferno	4–9	-0.09	14%	18 May →
inferno	9–7	0.14	18%	18 May →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	17%	18 May →
overpass	13–9	0.00	26%	18 May →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	12%	17 May →
dust2	13–8	-0.00	22%	17 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	38%	17 May →
mirage	8–13	0.01	19%	17 May →
ancient	15–15	0.01	20%	17 May →
mirage	13–10	0.14	20%	17 May →
ancient	13–8	0.07	22%	17 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.00	22%	17 May →
overpass	11–13	0.03	20%	17 May →
ancient	13–3	0.08	23%	17 May →
inferno	13–9	0.15	20%	17 May →
overpass	13–9	0.02	26%	17 May →
dust2	11–13	0.06	29%	17 May →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	6%	17 May →
nuke	13–6	0.01	25%	16 May →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	20%	16 May →
ancient	16–14	-0.04	23%	16 May →
nuke	13–4	0.02	24%	16 May →
ancient	3–13	0.02	25%	16 May →
mirage	15–15	0.01	19%	16 May →
overpass	13–2	0.10	26%	16 May →
ancient	9–13	-0.08	16%	16 May →
inferno	13–7	-0.04	21%	16 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	19%	16 May →
overpass	15–15	0.01	23%	16 May →
cache	13–7	-0.04	29%	16 May →
cache	11–13	-0.01	30%	16 May →
dust2	13–8	-0.00	12%	15 May →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	19%	15 May →
cache	10–13	-0.01	33%	15 May →
nuke	13–0	0.06	31%	15 May →
nuke	13–6	0.02	26%	12 May →
cache	6–13	-0.01	20%	11 May →
cache	3–7	0.05	23%	11 May →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	20%	10 May →
cache	13–7	-0.00	28%	9 May →
cache	12–12	0.06	20%	7 May →
cache	7–13	-0.01	17%	6 May →
cache	11–13	0.07	14%	5 May →
cache	13–6	0.09	13%	5 May →
nuke	2–9	-0.03	13%	5 May →
nuke	9–3	0.06	18%	5 May →
inferno	7–9	-0.15	29%	3 May →
inferno	9–4	0.09	19%	3 May →
inferno	8–8	0.00	50%	3 May →
nuke	6–9	0.06	28%	3 May →
cache	13–4	0.07	11%	3 May →
cache	13–10	0.03	20%	3 May →
cache	13–10	0.09	20%	3 May →
cache	5–0	-0.02	50%	3 May →
cache	6–13	-0.01	17%	2 May →
cache	13–9	-0.06	20%	29 Apr →
inferno	12–16	-0.08	18%	27 Apr →
mirage	13–3	0.06	29%	27 Apr →
inferno	10–13	-0.07	13%	26 Apr →
inferno	2–9	-0.15	25%	17 Apr →
inferno	1–9	-0.16	12%	17 Apr →