0Gjessica

0Gjessica — CS2 Stats

BS76561198160996960[U:1:200731232]Steam profile ↗

1,076Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG0GjessicaFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning47
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43552Last 10043%Win rateWLLWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0
Aggression6.4
Utility5.7
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.7
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time590ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 13–1
131Biggest win — mirage
3Longest win streak
44In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 77% over 13anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2112957%0.03
dust2C1761135%-0.01
nukeB136746%-0.02
infernoS1310377%-0.00
ancientD113827%-0.01
cacheD93633%-0.02
anubisD71614%-0.04
train4040%-0.06
overpass42250%-0.01
vertigo1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

131Matches
60%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
80.0ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1947%1.1715.2
Inferno771%1.0215.3
Dust2580%1.2419.2
Vertigo475%1.6813.8
Nuke3100%1.4016.0
Ancient333%0.6612.3
Anubis3100%1.0613.7
Overpass10%1.0015.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
598msReaction time
37.5%T opening success
35.5%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
11.23HE damage / grenade
10.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.5394% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–110.0125%30 Aug
cache3–13-0.0728%30 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.1013%11 Aug
dust25–0-0.030%11 Aug
cache2–13-0.0228%11 Aug
nuke2–130.009%11 Jul
mirage7–130.0220%11 Jul
ancient6–13-0.038%11 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0017%9 Jul
inferno13–70.0617%9 Jul
inferno10–130.0610%9 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0116%9 Jul
train7–13-0.0421%8 Jul
ancient13–50.0214%7 Jul
anubis13–80.0218%7 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0332%7 Jul
anubis8–130.0219%7 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0015%5 Jul
dust213–30.0227%5 Jul
dust25–13-0.0620%5 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0838%4 Jul
overpass13–11-0.0117%4 Jul
mirage13–70.0023%4 Jul
cache13–30.0114%4 Jul
dust29–13-0.0825%4 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0417%4 Jul
dust213–7-0.0130%3 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0213%3 Jul
cache5–13-0.0742%3 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0331%3 Jul
mirage13–10.0014%3 Jul
cache5–13-0.0129%3 Jul
cache10–130.0317%3 Jul
dust211–130.0221%29 Jun
cache9–13-0.0139%2 Jun
cache13–7-0.0740%7 May
anubis0–13-0.0644%28 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0819%28 Apr
mirage9–130.0133%28 Apr
dust22–13-0.0436%27 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0924%27 Apr
nuke10–4-0.0511%27 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0423%27 Apr
ancient8–13-0.059%27 Apr
nuke5–9-0.0912%19 Apr
inferno0–9-0.2838%19 Apr
inferno13–10.1222%19 Apr
mirage11–130.0117%18 Apr
dust215–15-0.0712%18 Apr
dust27–13-0.0215%18 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0415%18 Apr
mirage10–130.0220%14 Apr
mirage13–30.0829%14 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0029%12 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0150%12 Apr
mirage13–70.1124%12 Apr
mirage13–50.1018%12 Apr
train3–13-0.0923%3 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0521%17 Feb
ancient13–70.0721%4 Jan
overpass13–60.0322%25 Dec
dust25–13-0.0519%25 Dec
nuke13–60.0326%25 Dec
train8–13-0.0710%25 Dec
ancient7–13-0.0021%24 Dec
nuke13–30.0119%24 Dec
dust26–13-0.0112%24 Dec
inferno13–70.0540%12 Oct
nuke2–30.0540%12 Oct
mirage13–70.0928%12 Oct
mirage13–70.0326%12 Oct
inferno13–3-0.0021%12 Oct
ancient10–13-0.0225%12 Oct
dust210–13-0.0319%12 Oct
mirage13–20.1018%12 Oct
dust210–20.0125%12 Oct
overpass9–13-0.0323%30 Sept
anubis4–11-0.0412%9 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0323%9 Sept
nuke9–130.0517%9 Sept
dust213–60.1026%9 Sept
dust26–13-0.0515%9 Sept
inferno13–70.0122%8 Sept
ancient12–140.0112%4 Sept
overpass6–13-0.0218%4 Sept
ancient1–13-0.0418%4 Sept
mirage13–3-0.0112%3 Sept
dust27–130.0112%3 Sept
mirage13–60.0418%3 Sept
nuke13–100.0022%3 Sept
train15–15-0.0412%3 Sept
nuke7–13-0.107%8 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0216%6 Jul
inferno13–80.0423%6 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0710%6 Jul
mirage13–80.0315%6 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0025%6 Jul
dust213–40.0218%6 Jul
mirage9–130.0114%4 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0328%4 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →