mejdan — CS2 Stats

76561198156007154[U:1:195741426]

717Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,367Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,109), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate54.6%49.0%52.0%above
Shot accuracy13.4%13.1%13.7%meets
Kill/death ratio0.931.081.080.15 short
Match win rate43.2%46.9%48.8%5.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmejdanFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning50
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56404Last 10056%Win rateWWWLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1
Aggression5.9
Utility5.9
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 634ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.0
Utility5.9
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time632ms−77ms
first ⅓ avg 709ms → last ⅓ avg 632ms
Headshot accuracy22.0%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — dust2 13–3
131Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
611In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 14infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA39231659%-0.00
dust2A32191359%-0.00
ancientA149564%-0.01
infernoD72529%-0.02
anubisB63350%-0.04
overpass1010%-0.05
train1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

66,568Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
2,944Matches
43.2%Match win rate
54.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
13.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
7,142MVPs
1,367Hours (in match)
2,227Bombs planted
804Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,560inferno
5,272dust2
1,136vertigo
586train
358nuke
36office
26cbble
13lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
87.8%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
634msReaction time
30.1%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
6.09HE damage / grenade
13.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.0636% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–10-0.0511%25 Jul
dust213–70.0626%25 May
dust213–10-0.0221%25 May
inferno7–13-0.0617%21 May
mirage13–11-0.077%21 May
dust210–13-0.0621%18 May
ancient13–40.038%15 May
ancient13–110.0224%12 May
anubis13–10-0.0123%9 May
ancient16–13-0.0521%7 May
mirage13–70.0616%4 May
ancient14–16-0.0615%3 May
ancient13–5-0.0018%2 May
dust219–17-0.0219%29 Apr
ancient11–130.0731%29 Apr
overpass11–13-0.0534%28 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0329%27 Apr
ancient15–15-0.0419%13 Apr
dust25–130.0337%13 Apr
mirage8–130.0535%7 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0222%5 Apr
mirage13–50.0430%5 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0222%5 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0521%5 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0328%4 Apr
dust216–140.0143%4 Apr
dust213–5-0.0119%4 Apr
dust213–9-0.0219%29 Mar
mirage11–130.0616%27 Feb
dust25–130.0121%26 Feb
mirage13–40.0120%26 Feb
dust213–60.0816%24 Feb
dust216–13-0.0518%12 Nov
inferno13–3-0.0113%2 Oct
dust213–60.0123%2 Oct
mirage5–13-0.0715%9 Aug
dust213–30.1222%7 Aug
anubis10–130.0012%11 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0417%30 May
dust26–13-0.0622%17 May
mirage10–13-0.0335%16 May
ancient13–70.0126%16 May
dust210–13-0.0230%13 May
dust213–7-0.0515%13 May
inferno13–50.0222%8 May
dust213–4-0.0824%7 May
inferno12–120.0436%30 Apr
mirage12–20.1112%30 Apr
dust212–120.0323%30 Apr
dust213–80.0030%29 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0326%29 Apr
dust213–9-0.0039%28 Apr
dust213–9-0.0420%28 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0117%28 Apr
mirage13–10.0141%28 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0128%27 Apr
mirage13–100.0415%24 Apr
ancient13–50.0613%23 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0518%23 Apr
mirage13–20.0825%23 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0524%19 Apr
dust28–130.0830%18 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0420%18 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0520%13 Apr
mirage13–110.0018%13 Apr
mirage13–80.0419%13 Apr
dust211–130.0117%12 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0618%7 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0413%7 Apr
mirage11–130.0227%6 Apr
train10–13-0.0424%29 Mar
dust213–70.0619%28 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0527%22 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0219%8 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0719%5 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0527%5 Mar
mirage3–130.0337%12 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0333%7 Feb
dust212–120.0120%7 Feb
mirage13–60.0933%7 Feb
dust22–13-0.0314%21 Jan
mirage13–70.0620%11 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0814%19 Nov
dust29–13-0.0613%19 Nov
dust210–130.0428%10 Nov
ancient16–12-0.0414%9 Nov
mirage13–30.0112%31 Oct
mirage11–13-0.0117%30 Oct
dust213–60.0228%30 Oct
mirage13–60.0128%28 Oct
dust27–10.0431%26 Oct
inferno11–130.0211%20 Oct
mirage7–130.0015%19 Oct
mirage13–6-0.0919%16 Oct
mirage8–13-0.0725%12 Oct
dust213–7-0.0633%12 Oct
mirage13–90.0213%10 Oct
mirage13–40.0311%6 Oct
inferno7–13-0.0618%24 Sept
dust28–13-0.0434%19 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →