Coolagain — CS2 Stats

76561198155337851[U:1:195072123]

231Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since
305Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.8 Solid
Premier CS Rating16,097Purple band · top ~24% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8344 of 13511 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate34.2%48.1%13.9% short
Shot accuracy12.2%12.9%0.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.151.08above
Match win rate40.7%46.5%5.7% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCoolagainPREMIER16,097 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning59
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55423Last 10055%Win rateWLLWTWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8
Aggression7.5
Utility5.9
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning5.9
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time595ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — dust2 13–0
130Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 10anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A23131057%0.04
mirageC1981142%0.02
nukeA1810856%0.00
infernoB158753%0.01
ancientA106460%0.05
overpassA53260%0.01
anubisC52340%-0.01
vertigo220100%0.04
italy110100%0.00
warden110100%0.02
office110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

18,884Lifetime kills
1.15K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
896Matches
40.7%Match win rate
34.2%Headshot %
12.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
1,593MVPs
305Hours (in match)
856Bombs planted
217Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,891dust2
925inferno
759nuke
97cbble
85train
42vertigo
23office
16italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
29.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.5%Spray accuracy
78.2%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
602msReaction time
35.0%T opening success
52.7%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
16.76HE damage / grenade
6.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0229% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–11-0.0225%1 Apr
mirage10–130.0724%1 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0214%1 Apr
nuke13–110.039%1 Apr
dust215–15-0.0024%31 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0221%31 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0416%31 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0717%30 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0322%30 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0019%30 Mar
mirage14–16-0.0414%29 Mar
mirage9–130.0916%29 Mar
nuke16–130.0327%28 Mar
ancient13–100.1015%26 Mar
mirage13–70.0430%25 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0018%24 Mar
ancient13–50.0421%24 Mar
ancient13–110.0116%24 Mar
mirage11–130.0113%24 Mar
dust211–130.0220%24 Mar
dust213–2-0.0111%23 Mar
nuke13–10.0614%23 Mar
dust213–30.0713%19 Mar
inferno13–110.0123%19 Mar
overpass13–100.0720%18 Mar
ancient13–10.1521%18 Mar
mirage13–100.0637%18 Mar
dust27–130.0227%17 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0310%17 Mar
overpass8–130.0119%17 Mar
dust215–15-0.019%17 Mar
anubis12–16-0.0016%17 Mar
ancient13–160.0916%17 Mar
dust213–70.0114%17 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0411%16 Mar
overpass13–40.0019%16 Mar
anubis13–9-0.0216%16 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0012%16 Mar
dust24–130.0414%16 Mar
dust213–100.0410%16 Mar
dust213–00.1512%16 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0720%16 Mar
mirage13–10.1032%15 Mar
nuke2–30.0313%15 Mar
inferno16–130.0325%15 Mar
dust213–100.0414%15 Mar
nuke6–130.0320%15 Mar
mirage13–20.1211%15 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0114%14 Mar
mirage13–70.0220%12 Mar
dust213–70.0518%12 Mar
dust214–160.0018%12 Mar
inferno15–15-0.0324%12 Mar
dust29–130.0331%11 Mar
inferno13–30.0427%11 Mar
nuke13–2-0.0112%10 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0111%10 Mar
ancient13–100.0113%10 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0226%10 Mar
dust213–90.1227%10 Mar
dust213–100.0314%9 Mar
inferno13–110.0311%9 Mar
overpass6–13-0.0811%9 Mar
anubis13–70.0519%8 Mar
nuke13–30.0820%8 Mar
dust214–16-0.0419%7 Mar
ancient11–130.0311%7 Mar
nuke9–13-0.049%7 Mar
italy13–60.0013%7 Mar
warden13–100.0222%7 Mar
dust29–130.0515%6 Mar
dust213–70.0212%6 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0411%6 Mar
dust216–140.0615%6 Mar
dust27–130.0920%6 Mar
nuke5–130.0514%6 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0722%5 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0124%5 Mar
nuke13–60.0519%5 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0017%5 Mar
ancient1–40.0615%5 Mar
dust213–11-0.0125%4 Mar
mirage10–1-0.019%4 Mar
dust213–60.068%4 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0010%4 Mar
vertigo13–9-0.0131%4 Mar
nuke13–110.0211%4 Mar
vertigo13–60.0926%4 Mar
inferno13–30.0738%4 Mar
office13–60.0639%3 Mar
inferno13–90.0330%3 Mar
nuke13–7-0.0124%3 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0416%3 Mar
mirage1–130.0017%3 Mar
ancient10–130.0429%3 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0617%3 Mar
nuke13–10-0.048%2 Mar
overpass13–60.0313%2 Mar
inferno13–70.0818%2 Mar
mirage13–160.0115%2 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →