m0uka — CS2 Stats

CZ76561198152492642[U:1:192226914]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,231Tracked matches32%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,543Hours in CS25Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.3 Developing

Premier CS Rating14,443Blue band · top ~31.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#20635 of 32177 tracked

FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,109), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 9 median	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	40.0%	49.0%	52.0%	12.0% short
Shot accuracy	14.3%	13.1%	13.7%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.13	1.08	1.08	above
Match win rate	48.4%	46.9%	48.8%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57

Positioning57

Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–49–4Last 10047%Win rateLLLLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.7

Aggression8.4

Utility3.8

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7

Positioning5.7

Utility3.8

Mechanics4.8

Opening Duels4.2

Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time591ms−65ms

first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms

Headshot accuracy14.7%+2.5%

first ⅓ avg 12.2% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.30Best rating — mirage 3–8

13–1Biggest win — nuke

9Longest win streak

L4Current streak

8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 62% over 34infernoWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	34	21–13	62%	0.04
cache	B	20	9–11	45%	0.01
anubis	C	16	7–9	44%	0.02
dust2	D	12	4–8	33%	-0.00
ancient	C	9	4–5	44%	0.00
inferno	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.05
nuke	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

126,693Lifetime kills

1.13K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players

5,861Matches

48.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players

40.0%Headshot %

14.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players

21,729MVPs

2,050Hours (in match)

5,494Bombs planted

1,342Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4736,187

M4A4 / M4A1-S21,614

AWP13,327

P2000 / USP-S8,176

Desert Eagle7,434

Glock-185,585

Knife4,196

FAMAS2,800

Galil AR2,691

P902,580

Lifetime map wins

7,752inferno

5,473dust2

2,697vertigo

2,118nuke

1,638cbble

646train

285lake

218office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.5%Headshot accuracy

36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.2%Spray accuracy

71.5%Counter-strafing

11.6°Preaim

591msReaction time

32.8%T opening success

60.4%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

0.9%Flash assists

8.07HE damage / grenade

4.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.5397% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.8144% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	10–13	-0.01	20%	29 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	6%	29 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.00	9%	28 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.01	16%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.03	19%	28 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.17	21%	26 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.07	18%	25 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.07	10%	25 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.08	23%	21 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.02	14%	21 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	23%	21 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	24%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.06	7%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.08	15%	21 Aug →
cache	14–16	0.07	11%	20 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.01	10%	20 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.09	10%	20 Aug →
dust2	2–13	0.02	16%	20 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	12%	19 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.05	11%	19 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.07	19%	18 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.03	13%	18 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.17	8%	18 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	9%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.11	18%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.01	17%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.08	25%	17 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.03	14%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.04	12%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	7%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.09	19%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.01	17%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.05	11%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–4	-0.03	3%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.02	30%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.04	12%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.05	33%	14 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	35%	14 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.05	14%	14 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.00	9%	14 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.01	9%	14 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.02	9%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.01	19%	12 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.03	8%	11 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.06	17%	11 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	12%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	6%	10 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	20%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	17%	8 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.02	12%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.08	12%	8 Aug →
anubis	0–2	-0.13	0%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.04	11%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.03	9%	7 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.01	12%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.07	15%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	5%	5 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.04	12%	5 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.02	13%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.10	8%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.01	15%	4 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.06	11%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.06	18%	3 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.00	9%	3 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.03	6%	2 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.05	11%	2 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.06	3%	2 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	17%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	7%	31 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.09	18%	30 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	6%	26 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.07	11%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.03	19%	25 Jul →
mirage	3–13	0.02	10%	25 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	13%	25 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	18%	25 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.00	2%	25 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.07	10%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	13%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.06	16%	24 Jul →
cache	14–16	0.04	14%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.07	6%	23 Jul →
anubis	16–14	-0.03	20%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.04	9%	22 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.04	14%	22 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.02	5%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.06	18%	22 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	11%	21 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.06	10%	21 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.03	8%	21 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.02	16%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.06	7%	20 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.00	19%	18 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.07	11%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.08	3%	17 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	14%	16 Jul →
cache	16–14	-0.01	19%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.06	16%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.11	14%	14 Jul →
mirage	3–8	0.30	10%	14 Jul →

Show all 100 matchesShow fewer

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

Explore CSDB.gg

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other games eDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPI cm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turn Resolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutions Crosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

Sticker Craft MakerPlan and price a CS2 sticker craft with live prices on every piece CS2 Stats TrackerLook up any player: Premier rating, Faceit level, matches and skill breakdown Trust Factor CheckerEstimate your CS2 Trust Factor from the signals Valve has acknowledged

Learn & Explore

Most Traded CS2 SkinsRanked by completed sales — transaction data, not listings Cheapest Knives in CS2Every knife type ranked by its cheapest live price Cheapest Gloves in CS2Every glove model ranked by its cheapest live price