Jags32 — CS2 Stats

76561198151306114[U:1:191040386]

663Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,436Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,810Purple band · top ~25.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#30855 of 53871 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

16,025Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 215 below peak (16,025)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,190 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,711), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate52.3%42.7%44.0%above
Shot accuracy14.3%10.8%11.6%above
Kill/death ratio0.831.001.030.20 short
Match win rate37.1%44.1%45.1%8.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJags32FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER15,810 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning49
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50482Last 10050%Win rateLWLWWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6
Aggression4.7
Utility4.1
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch2.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.9
Utility4.1
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time554ms−107ms
first ⅓ avg 661ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–6
132Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 88% over 8infernoWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C30131743%0.01
mirageA2113862%0.02
cacheB157847%0.01
infernoD113827%0.03
nukeC104640%0.00
ancientS87188%0.03
anubis42250%0.04
vertigo110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

47,699Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
2,676Matches
37.1%Match win rate
52.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
14.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
6,222MVPs
937Hours (in match)
2,578Bombs planted
452Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,177dust2
2,174inferno
620nuke
429train
337cbble
75vertigo
39lake
23safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

181Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
73.8ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2862%1.0214.4
Mirage667%1.2416.2
Anubis425%1.4317.5
Inferno333%0.8812.3
Cache367%1.1623.3
Nuke3100%3.3915.7
Ancient2100%1.4213.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
90.1%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
562msReaction time
34.8%T opening success
40.8%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
3.16HE damage / grenade
8.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.8316% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno5–130.0221%29 Aug
cache13–100.0525%29 Aug
dust211–130.0417%28 Aug
cache13–7-0.0421%28 Aug
mirage13–90.0122%28 Aug
inferno7–130.0937%28 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0618%25 Aug
cache13–11-0.0216%25 Aug
dust27–130.0223%25 Aug
dust213–60.0318%25 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0114%25 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0212%25 Aug
anubis11–130.0519%24 Aug
mirage10–130.0420%24 Aug
cache13–70.1022%24 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0422%24 Aug
dust210–13-0.0317%20 Aug
dust213–7-0.0220%20 Aug
mirage13–80.0420%20 Aug
nuke11–130.0322%20 Aug
cache13–10-0.0628%13 Aug
mirage13–40.0013%13 Aug
dust213–7-0.0422%13 Aug
nuke13–70.0724%12 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0220%10 Aug
vertigo9–60.0926%10 Aug
dust27–13-0.0429%10 Aug
mirage13–40.0824%10 Aug
dust210–130.0019%10 Aug
dust213–40.0215%10 Aug
cache13–50.0621%10 Aug
inferno12–120.0118%10 Aug
cache10–13-0.0420%5 Aug
dust216–120.0720%4 Aug
dust27–13-0.0424%4 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0318%4 Aug
ancient13–70.0717%3 Aug
mirage13–90.0515%3 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0319%2 Aug
cache10–130.0851%1 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0522%1 Aug
mirage7–130.0319%1 Aug
dust216–140.0226%1 Aug
mirage13–60.1239%1 Aug
inferno13–20.0824%1 Aug
inferno9–130.0737%1 Aug
inferno9–10.0221%1 Aug
mirage13–100.0417%1 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0124%31 Jul
dust213–60.0521%31 Jul
ancient13–100.0711%31 Jul
ancient13–50.0926%31 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0215%31 Jul
dust29–130.0119%31 Jul
mirage13–100.0320%31 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0012%30 Jul
dust210–130.1025%30 Jul
dust29–13-0.0021%30 Jul
dust213–80.0426%30 Jul
mirage10–130.0318%30 Jul
dust213–90.0714%30 Jul
dust214–160.0320%30 Jul
cache6–13-0.0023%30 Jul
dust27–130.0022%29 Jul
mirage13–110.0322%29 Jul
cache13–110.0626%29 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0321%29 Jul
mirage13–50.0114%28 Jul
mirage1–8-0.0213%28 Jul
dust27–130.0026%26 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0415%25 Jul
dust213–110.0120%24 Jul
dust216–140.0617%24 Jul
inferno13–70.0221%24 Jul
cache4–13-0.0322%24 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0221%21 Jul
dust215–15-0.0015%21 Jul
nuke9–130.0213%20 Jul
inferno6–130.0522%20 Jul
dust25–13-0.0626%15 Jul
cache8–13-0.0526%15 Jul
mirage16–120.0020%14 Jul
anubis13–20.1018%14 Jul
ancient13–80.0912%14 Jul
nuke13–40.0024%14 Jul
mirage13–80.0215%14 Jul
dust29–13-0.0228%10 Jul
cache9–130.0420%10 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0434%10 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0224%10 Jul
dust213–70.0239%10 Jul
cache11–13-0.0219%10 Jul
dust213–9-0.140%9 Jul
inferno7–130.0122%9 Jul
dust24–13-0.0328%9 Jul
nuke22–19-0.0315%8 Jul
dust29–130.0230%7 Jul
nuke11–13-0.007%7 Jul
anubis9–10.0621%7 Jul
cache11–13-0.0214%7 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →