H.O.B | Rav(u) — CS2 Stats

76561198148941054[U:1:188675326]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,832Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.5 Developing

Premier CS Rating12,522Blue band · top ~41.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#14770 of 21177 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55

Positioning51

Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–56–4Last 10040%Win rateLWLWTLTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.5

Aggression6.5

Utility5.2

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels2.1

Clutch1.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 649ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5

Positioning5.1

Utility5.2

Mechanics6.2

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact1.4

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time657ms+13ms

first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 657ms

Headshot accuracy17.4%+3.5%

first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–3

13–0Biggest win — inferno

4Longest win streak

4–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 55% over 11anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	26	11–15	42%	-0.02
mirage	B	17	8–9	47%	0.00
nuke	B	15	8–7	53%	0.01
inferno	D	14	3–11	21%	-0.01
ancient	A	11	6–5	55%	-0.02
cache	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.05
anubis	D	5	1–4	20%	0.05
vertigo	—	2	0–2	0%	0.03
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	0.09
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	0.04
eldorado	—	1	1–0	100%	0.04
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

47Matches

51%Win rate

0.82Avg K/D

68.5ADR

37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win

16%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	8	25%	0.82	13.6
Dust2	8	50%	0.84	16.3
Cache	8	75%	0.81	11.1
Anubis	6	50%	1.14	12.2
Inferno	6	67%	0.69	12.7
Nuke	5	40%	0.74	13.0
Overpass	2	100%	0.81	13.0
Mirage	2	0%	0.48	9.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy

33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.8%Spray accuracy

78.0%Counter-strafing

11.8°Preaim

649msReaction time

31.9%T opening success

44.6%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

4.6%Flash assists

9.52HE damage / grenade

8.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4915 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.8847% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	2–13	-0.05	17%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.14	24%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–16	-0.01	10%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.01	21%	24 Aug →
vertigo	8–8	-0.01	6%	24 Aug →
inferno	1–9	-0.12	5%	24 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.01	21%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.05	20%	22 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.02	13%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–0	0.01	31%	15 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	9%	7 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	31%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.03	11%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.01	14%	6 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	21%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	15%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.04	14%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.05	10%	2 Aug →
nuke	4–13	0.01	14%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.02	9%	1 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	15%	24 Jul →
mirage	3–13	0.01	21%	24 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.01	24%	24 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	38%	24 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.03	12%	23 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.02	21%	23 Jul →
anubis	15–15	0.05	13%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	15%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–16	0.01	16%	22 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.05	25%	22 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.05	19%	21 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.08	22%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.05	16%	21 Jul →
ancient	0–13	-0.06	13%	21 Jul →
nuke	16–13	-0.03	19%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.04	11%	19 Jul →
ancient	16–12	0.02	15%	19 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.07	34%	19 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.03	30%	19 Jul →
cache	13–1	-0.08	4%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.07	16%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	10%	18 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.02	13%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.07	12%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.02	15%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.04	22%	16 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.08	24%	16 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.09	5%	15 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.00	21%	15 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	6%	15 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	16%	15 Jul →
nuke	14–16	-0.06	18%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	22%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.07	18%	13 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.01	13%	12 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	17%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.00	18%	12 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.05	14%	12 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.09	6%	12 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.03	2%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.05	32%	12 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.07	8%	12 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	20%	12 Jul →
ancient	1–13	-0.12	18%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.02	24%	11 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.01	16%	11 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.07	13%	11 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.07	14%	11 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.00	12%	11 Jul →
inferno	9–5	0.11	19%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	25%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	6%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.09	13%	10 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	10%	10 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.07	18%	10 Jul →
fachwerk	7–13	0.09	10%	9 Jul →
shelter	7–13	0.04	11%	9 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.05	15%	9 Jul →
eldorado	9–4	0.04	3%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	18%	9 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	13%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.02	19%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.00	13%	9 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	8%	9 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.02	10%	9 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.05	15%	9 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.03	16%	9 Jul →
debris	5–9	-0.07	8%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.02	23%	9 Jul →
vertigo	8–8	0.06	15%	8 Jul →
inferno	3–9	-0.04	11%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.02	14%	6 Jul →
dust2	2–9	-0.05	29%	6 Jul →
ancient	1–7	-0.08	0%	6 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.06	8%	6 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	19%	6 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.02	13%	6 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.09	10%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.04	24%	5 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	17%	5 Jul →