Sapeak

Sapeak — CS2 Stats

76561198147196835[U:1:186931107]Steam profile ↗

759Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,021Purple band · top ~20.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17384 of 31572 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSapeakPREMIER17,021 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning52
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46522Last 10046%Win rateLLLWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7
Aggression8.4
Utility5.0
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.2
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time564ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 13–0
130Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 68% over 31anubisWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS31211068%0.01
ancientA1811761%-0.02
nukeD1641225%0.00
anubisD1431121%-0.03
dust2C83538%0.01
mirageD72529%-0.01
cache31233%-0.02
overpass31233%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

51Matches
45%Win rate
0.77Avg K/D
ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1136%0.599.1
Anubis1155%0.9013.3
Inferno1040%0.7211.1
Mirage367%0.7715.3
Overpass30%0.569.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
30.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
562msReaction time
30.3%T opening success
58.9%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
6.80HE damage / grenade
12.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4991 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.2589% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–13-0.0119%27 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0417%27 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0914%27 Aug
inferno13–30.0423%25 Aug
inferno4–130.0027%25 Aug
ancient11–13-0.076%22 Aug
ancient16–120.0318%6 Aug
cache13–10-0.0324%6 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0221%6 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0327%6 Aug
inferno13–70.0023%6 Aug
cache11–13-0.0215%5 Aug
dust27–13-0.0212%5 Aug
nuke5–130.0214%5 Aug
inferno13–100.0723%29 Jul
dust21–13-0.0336%29 Jul
mirage9–130.0020%28 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0521%28 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0415%28 Jul
inferno13–90.0833%28 Jul
inferno13–40.0214%26 Jul
ancient13–30.0010%26 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0024%26 Jul
inferno13–60.0633%26 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0616%23 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0215%23 Jul
cache5–13-0.0134%21 Jul
anubis2–13-0.098%18 Jul
inferno9–130.0124%18 Jul
anubis13–160.0110%18 Jul
nuke8–130.0317%16 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0310%4 Jul
dust213–110.0336%4 Jul
ancient13–30.0914%4 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0212%4 Jul
overpass7–130.0118%4 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0417%2 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0515%2 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0214%2 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0431%2 Jul
inferno13–110.0027%2 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0319%30 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0223%30 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0430%30 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0013%30 Jun
inferno15–150.0514%25 Jun
dust27–13-0.0317%21 Jun
inferno11–130.0525%21 Jun
mirage10–130.0513%21 Jun
ancient13–2-0.069%21 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0516%21 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0522%17 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0411%17 Jun
inferno1–13-0.0621%17 Jun
mirage13–80.0919%15 Jun
nuke11–130.0027%15 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0314%15 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0712%4 Jun
dust23–13-0.0733%4 Jun
overpass13–30.0322%4 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0216%2 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0717%2 Jun
inferno16–130.0111%2 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0018%2 Jun
anubis10–130.0516%2 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0214%31 May
inferno8–13-0.0117%31 May
nuke13–40.0421%31 May
inferno13–00.1213%27 May
inferno13–100.0525%27 May
anubis13–50.0516%27 May
anubis10–13-0.0329%25 May
nuke5–130.015%25 May
inferno13–60.0119%20 May
inferno13–5-0.0022%20 May
dust213–80.1023%20 May
anubis16–14-0.0617%18 May
nuke2–130.0122%18 May
ancient8–130.0616%18 May
nuke5–13-0.0310%16 May
nuke7–13-0.0521%16 May
inferno13–80.0510%13 May
ancient13–10-0.0212%12 May
dust210–130.0117%12 May
overpass9–13-0.0624%12 May
anubis13–30.0619%12 May
anubis2–13-0.0622%4 May
inferno9–130.0414%4 May
nuke13–100.0233%4 May
inferno10–130.0916%4 May
inferno13–5-0.048%13 Apr
inferno13–6-0.0111%11 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0318%11 Apr
nuke13–50.0811%11 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0718%11 Apr
dust213–70.0716%9 Apr
nuke15–15-0.0118%9 Apr
mirage7–13-0.1013%24 Mar
inferno5–20.0250%24 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0011%22 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →