elenoyi — CS2 Stats

NZ76561197988699262[U:1:28433534]Steam profile ↗

1,584Tracked matches39%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,632Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#7321 of 28047 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,454 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93

Positioning55

Utility78

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD37–59–4Last 10037%Win rateLLLLLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.3

Aggression7.0

Utility7.8

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels2.5

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 78 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3

Positioning5.5

Utility7.8

Mechanics7.6

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact1.4

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time504ms−64ms

first ⅓ avg 568ms → last ⅓ avg 504ms

Headshot accuracy24.6%+4.4%

first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — nuke 13–3

13–2Biggest win — ancient

4Longest win streak

L6Current streak

6–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

19Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 50% over 18nukeWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	C	29	12–17	41%	0.02
ancient	B	18	9–9	50%	0.02
anubis	D	15	4–11	27%	0.01
mirage	D	14	4–10	29%	0.04
cache	C	14	6–8	43%	0.05
nuke	D	6	1–5	17%	0.03
dust2	—	4	1–3	25%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

270Matches

54%Win rate

1.38Avg K/D

86.5ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	54	50%	1.21	16.4
Ancient	31	48%	1.50	20.3
Anubis	30	53%	1.22	17.1
Inferno	29	76%	1.55	19.0
Dust2	15	67%	1.34	16.4
Vertigo	12	58%	1.23	19.3
Nuke	11	45%	1.24	18.4
Overpass	5	100%	1.71	21.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy

39.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.6%Spray accuracy

84.0%Counter-strafing

6.9°Preaim

503msReaction time

30.5%T opening success

49.8%CT opening success

0.69Enemies flashed / flash

6.2%Flash assists

13.25HE damage / grenade

20.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.5378% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	14–16	-0.01	17%	28 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	27%	28 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.05	27%	27 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	32%	27 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.03	18%	27 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.03	38%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.10	37%	26 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.02	32%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.14	39%	26 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.03	22%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.06	18%	25 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.03	23%	25 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.04	10%	25 Aug →
cache	14–16	0.08	17%	25 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.07	33%	25 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.07	9%	24 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.02	19%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.05	35%	24 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.10	22%	24 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.04	26%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–3	-0.01	16%	23 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.12	23%	23 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	29%	23 Aug →
mirage	12–16	0.00	22%	23 Aug →
ancient	16–12	0.13	29%	23 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.13	24%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.06	26%	22 Aug →
inferno	14–16	0.01	27%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.01	23%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	20%	22 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.02	18%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	26%	20 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.15	29%	20 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.07	23%	20 Aug →
nuke	3–3	0.10	9%	19 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.03	27%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.12	29%	16 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.00	23%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.15	24%	16 Aug →
ancient	16–12	-0.01	13%	6 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.09	15%	6 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.00	15%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.19	24%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.13	31%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–16	-0.05	17%	5 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.10	19%	5 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.04	16%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.02	25%	2 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.00	31%	2 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	4%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.03	19%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.04	18%	2 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.05	21%	2 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.05	19%	2 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.04	16%	2 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	9%	2 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.03	27%	2 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.02	18%	2 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	21%	2 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.02	26%	2 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	11%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.08	11%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.01	24%	1 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.06	25%	1 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.02	17%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–16	0.06	26%	1 Aug →
anubis	14–16	-0.03	14%	1 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.06	32%	1 Aug →
inferno	16–14	-0.01	13%	30 Jul →
ancient	16–13	0.02	19%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.05	15%	29 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.04	23%	29 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.00	21%	29 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.04	25%	29 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.02	28%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.09	22%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.14	23%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.04	25%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.03	15%	26 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.01	6%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.06	22%	26 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.04	29%	25 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.05	14%	25 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.04	19%	24 Jul →
ancient	16–14	0.03	20%	24 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.05	19%	24 Jul →
anubis	16–13	0.06	20%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.00	28%	22 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.06	18%	22 Jul →
ancient	1–13	-0.09	14%	22 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.07	20%	22 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.09	12%	22 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.12	17%	20 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.00	38%	20 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.01	29%	19 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.02	20%	19 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.04	15%	19 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.05	22%	19 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.03	16%	18 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.02	10%	18 Jul →