dogwithplantonhead

dogwithplantonhead — CS2 Stats

US76561198135964054[U:1:175698326]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,373Tracked matches74%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,733Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdogwithplantonheadFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning48
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52399Last 10052%Win rateWWWWLTLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim8.0
Aggression3.7
Utility7.1
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch1.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.8
Utility7.1
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time544ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — debris 9–1
132Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
W4Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 12anubisWeakest map · 0% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2113862%0.02
ancientA159660%0.00
mirageD1551033%0.01
cacheS1210283%0.02
nukeS96367%-0.00
anubisD7070%0.00
boulderB63350%-0.01
fachwerk41325%-0.02
shelter32167%0.04
train2020%0.01
debris220100%0.06
vertigo21150%-0.00
inferno1010%-0.01
overpass1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

47,239Lifetime kills
1.17K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
2,366Matches
45.9%Match win rate
47.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
8.0%Shot accuracy
4,341MVPs
921Hours (in match)
2,367Bombs planted
764Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,943dust2
2,106nuke
2,027inferno
1,171vertigo
372train
272cbble
251office
65italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

7Matches
43%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
71.0ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage250%1.1216.5
Dust210%0.538.0
Anubis1100%1.6213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
78.4%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
528msReaction time
20.7%T opening success
42.9%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
11.9%Flash assists
9.60HE damage / grenade
20.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.7458% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–80.0118%26 Aug
cache13–4-0.0118%26 Aug
dust213–11-0.0216%26 Aug
dust213–70.0411%25 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0415%25 Aug
ancient12–120.0218%24 Aug
mirage10–130.0013%23 Aug
nuke11–2-0.020%23 Aug
dust29–130.0215%14 Aug
cache13–110.0217%14 Aug
mirage13–80.0818%14 Aug
cache11–130.1214%13 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0319%13 Aug
dust213–50.0416%13 Aug
cache13–8-0.0216%13 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0216%13 Aug
mirage13–20.0324%13 Aug
ancient13–90.0214%13 Aug
dust213–110.0712%12 Aug
dust212–120.0110%12 Aug
nuke13–60.0012%12 Aug
ancient13–90.0220%12 Aug
nuke13–110.0620%11 Aug
anubis12–12-0.0110%11 Aug
mirage13–90.0130%10 Aug
anubis11–13-0.066%10 Aug
cache13–70.0111%10 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0419%8 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0146%8 Aug
ancient13–70.0219%8 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0713%8 Aug
dust213–100.0113%8 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0118%7 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0518%7 Aug
cache13–100.0712%7 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0111%7 Aug
dust213–30.1029%7 Aug
dust23–13-0.036%5 Aug
mirage11–13-0.030%5 Aug
dust212–120.0719%5 Aug
cache13–100.0216%4 Aug
mirage13–60.0432%4 Aug
dust213–60.0313%4 Aug
dust213–110.0018%4 Aug
dust213–100.0513%3 Aug
anubis8–130.0216%3 Aug
train1–13-0.0418%2 Aug
anubis4–130.1227%2 Aug
boulder6–130.0331%2 Aug
dust212–12-0.014%1 Aug
inferno11–13-0.018%1 Aug
debris9–10.1825%1 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0218%1 Aug
mirage1–130.0323%1 Aug
dust213–70.0721%1 Aug
boulder13–100.1112%1 Aug
dust211–13-0.0521%1 Aug
ancient13–90.0315%1 Aug
mirage12–120.0731%31 Jul
dust20–13-0.100%31 Jul
fachwerk7–13-0.0413%31 Jul
cache9–13-0.0313%31 Jul
nuke12–120.0628%31 Jul
mirage10–130.0617%31 Jul
nuke0–6-0.0333%30 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0615%30 Jul
ancient13–50.1029%30 Jul
boulder13–80.0432%29 Jul
vertigo4–13-0.0318%29 Jul
train7–130.0617%29 Jul
cache13–100.0619%29 Jul
overpass8–130.047%29 Jul
dust210–13-0.0113%29 Jul
ancient13–50.017%28 Jul
ancient13–100.0122%21 Jul
mirage9–130.0114%21 Jul
vertigo13–70.0210%20 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0417%20 Jul
cache13–6-0.0417%20 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0311%20 Jul
ancient6–13-0.018%19 Jul
anubis8–130.0231%19 Jul
cache13–70.0123%18 Jul
nuke13–100.008%18 Jul
anubis10–13-0.043%18 Jul
dust213–10-0.0119%18 Jul
dust213–70.0119%17 Jul
boulder13–9-0.0811%17 Jul
dust213–100.1015%16 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0513%16 Jul
fachwerk10–13-0.0410%16 Jul
shelter13–100.007%16 Jul
cache13–100.0117%15 Jul
shelter5–130.0028%15 Jul
debris9–6-0.053%15 Jul
boulder7–13-0.0817%14 Jul
shelter13–50.1228%14 Jul
fachwerk13–110.0215%14 Jul
boulder8–13-0.0914%13 Jul
fachwerk12–12-0.0414%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →