Lil Sweet — CS2 Stats

76561198135754273[U:1:175488545]

685Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,901Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating10,562Blue band · top ~51.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15762 of 21718 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLil SweetFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER10,562 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning43
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48439Last 10048%Win rateLLTWWWWWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.2
Aggression5.4
Utility5.5
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 630ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning4.3
Utility5.5
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact8.1

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time631ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy14.1%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 14.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–8
130Biggest win — vertigo
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 10infernoWeakest map · 35% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC24101442%0.02
infernoC2071335%-0.00
dust2B126650%0.01
overpassS108280%0.02
cacheA85363%0.01
officeC83538%-0.01
anubisC73443%0.00
ancient41325%-0.02
vertigo32167%0.00
nuke21150%-0.01
grail220100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,872Lifetime kills
1.05K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
2,004Matches
45.9%Match win rate
40.1%Headshot %
15.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
3,843MVPs
858Hours (in match)
1,958Bombs planted
516Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,440dust2
4,367inferno
1,055vertigo
909office
559nuke
234train
23militia
19cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

108Matches
56%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
69.7ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage683%1.2014.0
Inferno4100%1.1612.5
Dust2450%1.1014.0
Vertigo250%0.568.5
Anubis1100%1.4320.0
Ancient1100%0.8310.0
Train10%1.0618.0
Overpass1100%1.4021.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.1%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
630msReaction time
36.4%T opening success
30.8%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
5.48HE damage / grenade
10.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.1248% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.4285% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass4–13-0.0917%16 Aug
mirage6–13-0.038%16 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0016%15 Aug
cache13–9-0.0712%15 Aug
cache13–100.0113%13 Aug
ancient13–8-0.058%13 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0013%13 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0616%13 Aug
inferno15–150.0326%11 Aug
dust211–130.0411%11 Aug
mirage13–90.1414%11 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0418%11 Aug
inferno13–60.0515%10 Aug
cache4–130.0519%10 Aug
mirage13–20.0916%10 Aug
dust213–8-0.0018%9 Aug
dust27–13-0.0312%9 Aug
mirage13–30.058%9 Aug
dust213–5-0.0322%9 Aug
inferno12–120.0315%9 Aug
cache4–9-0.027%9 Aug
nuke8–130.0310%8 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0512%8 Aug
inferno7–130.0113%8 Aug
mirage6–13-0.070%8 Aug
inferno13–70.0514%6 Aug
dust213–80.0122%6 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.0211%6 Aug
mirage13–110.0122%2 Aug
dust214–160.0611%1 Aug
cache13–100.0418%1 Aug
anubis12–120.0822%1 Aug
vertigo13–00.037%1 Aug
overpass13–20.1110%1 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0517%26 Jul
inferno12–120.0111%26 Jul
office9–13-0.069%26 Jul
vertigo13–8-0.0022%26 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0110%26 Jul
mirage5–13-0.074%25 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0813%25 Jul
office12–12-0.0521%23 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0119%23 Jul
anubis13–110.0224%7 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0123%7 Jun
dust212–12-0.0812%6 Jun
cache6–130.0314%6 Jun
mirage13–80.1619%30 May
inferno10–130.0622%30 May
dust213–40.0722%30 May
mirage5–130.0117%30 May
mirage15–150.1420%25 May
overpass13–70.0023%25 May
mirage9–130.0512%25 May
anubis3–130.0223%25 May
overpass13–20.0518%24 May
anubis9–130.1011%23 May
inferno6–13-0.0221%23 May
mirage8–13-0.0522%23 May
mirage7–9-0.0417%18 May
office13–50.0515%17 May
cache13–80.0317%17 May
office13–100.0419%17 May
cache13–80.0123%16 May
mirage7–13-0.048%14 May
overpass13–100.0713%11 May
mirage10–130.0015%10 May
inferno7–130.0124%10 May
inferno13–70.0317%10 May
dust213–40.0518%10 May
anubis7–13-0.0525%9 May
ancient6–13-0.0113%3 May
inferno7–130.0419%18 Apr
mirage13–110.0416%23 Jan
grail13–60.056%7 Sept
dust211–13-0.0414%7 Sept
grail13–2-0.0120%7 Sept
office3–13-0.0518%7 Sept
inferno12–12-0.0413%7 Sept
office7–130.0014%6 Sept
office13–10-0.0330%6 Sept
office11–13-0.0223%6 Sept
dust27–13-0.0115%21 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0115%19 Aug
overpass13–100.0611%27 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0219%27 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0218%27 Jul
mirage3–13-0.1214%26 Jul
overpass7–13-0.0416%26 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0713%26 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0413%26 Jul
dust213–20.0514%26 Jul
overpass13–80.0119%26 Jul
mirage13–110.0216%26 Jul
overpass13–5-0.028%25 Jul
mirage13–00.143%25 Jul
overpass13–110.0716%23 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0716%23 Jul
mirage7–130.039%20 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0117%20 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →