Potato Ass — CS2 Stats

76561198135556437[U:1:175290709]

1,148Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating19,538Purple band · top ~10.3% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning69

Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–48–4Last 10048%Win rateLWWWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim7.3

Aggression10.0

Utility2.8

Positioning6.9

Opening Duels7.1

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning6.9

Utility2.8

Mechanics6.1

Opening Duels7.1

Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time539ms−5ms

first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms

Headshot accuracy15.5%−2.6%

first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — cache 13–7

13–1Biggest win — dust2

8Longest win streak

2–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 16anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	C	25	11–14	44%	0.03
mirage	C	18	7–11	39%	0.03
dust2	A	16	10–6	63%	0.03
ancient	A	12	7–5	58%	0.04
anubis	C	11	4–7	36%	0.02
inferno	A	11	6–5	55%	0.01
alpine	—	3	1–2	33%	0.07
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	0.04
nuke	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.06
warden	—	1	1–0	100%	0.09
office	—	1	0–1	0%	0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

197Matches

50%Win rate

1.53Avg K/D

—ADR

37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	3	33%	0.94	14.3
Ancient	2	0%	0.69	12.0
Inferno	2	50%	0.76	11.5
Mirage	1	0%	0.38	5.0
Nuke	1	100%	1.42	17.0
Vertigo	1	100%	0.80	12.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy

34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.8%Spray accuracy

77.4%Counter-strafing

8.4°Preaim

522msReaction time

55.4%T opening success

61.3%CT opening success

0.36Enemies flashed / flash

3.6%Flash assists

9.30HE damage / grenade

3.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3566 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	7–13	-0.02	13%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.07	23%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.10	16%	22 Aug →
cache	13–2	-0.00	18%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.08	19%	13 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	11%	12 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.11	0%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.06	9%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.10	11%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.02	14%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.01	17%	10 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.12	22%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–16	-0.01	20%	8 Aug →
cache	12–16	0.09	18%	8 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.09	13%	6 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.06	20%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.04	4%	4 Aug →
dust2	1–7	-0.05	29%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.02	16%	4 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.06	25%	4 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	8%	4 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.03	30%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.12	21%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.11	15%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.12	19%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.01	12%	2 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	13%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.13	22%	1 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	13%	29 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.06	0%	29 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.06	3%	29 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.10	25%	29 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	14%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	14%	29 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.02	15%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.05	25%	28 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.03	18%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.12	26%	27 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.09	6%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.01	24%	25 Jul →
dust2	2–8	-0.12	0%	25 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	18%	24 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.03	18%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.08	21%	24 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.02	20%	22 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.00	17%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	32%	21 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.00	18%	21 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.03	5%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.13	22%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.03	18%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.03	11%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.02	29%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–5	-0.02	22%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.03	17%	19 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.01	17%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.03	17%	19 Jul →
inferno	12–16	-0.02	15%	18 Jul →
cache	1–13	0.06	23%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.07	11%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.03	20%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.08	23%	18 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.05	15%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.04	15%	17 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.03	22%	17 Jul →
mirage	12–16	0.11	21%	16 Jul →
shelter	12–12	0.04	20%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.03	28%	16 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.09	11%	16 Jul →
anubis	15–15	0.02	16%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.13	22%	16 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.03	15%	15 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	20%	13 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.10	13%	13 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.01	32%	13 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.00	19%	12 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.06	17%	12 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	14%	12 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.06	13%	11 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.07	13%	11 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.00	18%	11 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.04	19%	11 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.02	26%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.10	18%	11 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.01	17%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	14%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.06	17%	9 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.01	14%	8 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.04	23%	8 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.10	25%	8 Jul →
alpine	11–13	0.05	13%	8 Jul →
warden	13–3	0.09	21%	8 Jul →
cache	1–5	-0.01	26%	8 Jul →
alpine	11–13	0.08	13%	8 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.02	21%	7 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.17	16%	7 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.11	19%	7 Jul →
alpine	13–5	0.07	12%	7 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.10	23%	7 Jul →
office	10–13	0.13	14%	7 Jul →