tater tingus

tater tingus — CS2 Stats

76561198134446847[U:1:174181119]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

864Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,375Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 Developing
Premier CS Rating13,549Blue band · top ~36.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#27727 of 42417 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,468), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate28.3%41.4%44.2%15.9% short
Shot accuracy15.0%9.0%11.6%above
Kill/death ratio1.080.971.03above
Match win rate45.2%43.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtater tingusPREMIER13,549 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47
Positioning38
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52426Last 10052%Win rateWWLTLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.7
Aggression4.4
Utility5.6
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels0.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7
Positioning3.8
Utility5.6
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time574ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy10.1%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 10.1% → last ⅓ avg 10.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — nuke 13–3
131Biggest win — anubis
6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
157In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 72% over 18dust2Weakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2516964%0.00
nukeS1813572%0.03
ancientC125742%0.01
cacheC125742%-0.01
infernoA127558%0.01
dust2D102820%0.02
anubisC83538%-0.02
overpass31233%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,796Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Blue band
2,795Matches
45.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Blue band
28.3%Headshot %
15.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Blue band
6,073MVPs
1,119Hours (in match)
1,675Bombs planted
674Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,586nuke
5,622dust2
1,646office
1,523inferno
917vertigo
204train
175cbble
122lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.4%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
75.3%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
576msReaction time
35.1%T opening success
25.6%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
1.4%Flash assists
8.77HE damage / grenade
11.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.408% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0914% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–20.0916%24 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0012%24 Aug
ancient10–13-0.035%23 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0114%21 Aug
mirage7–130.017%20 Aug
mirage5–130.039%16 Aug
cache14–16-0.0311%15 Aug
cache13–160.0711%12 Aug
dust216–140.0412%11 Aug
mirage16–13-0.017%9 Aug
mirage6–13-0.056%8 Aug
cache13–5-0.039%6 Aug
cache6–13-0.0413%5 Aug
cache13–40.009%4 Aug
inferno13–110.0312%4 Aug
nuke13–100.0411%3 Aug
nuke13–40.0310%30 Jul
ancient9–13-0.057%30 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0410%30 Jul
cache13–110.0119%29 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0020%29 Jul
nuke13–100.034%28 Jul
dust211–13-0.0312%28 Jul
ancient13–4-0.016%28 Jul
nuke13–100.0313%27 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0510%27 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0511%26 Jul
mirage13–100.0114%26 Jul
dust210–130.045%26 Jul
ancient11–130.018%26 Jul
mirage13–110.049%25 Jul
mirage16–12-0.027%24 Jul
inferno11–13-0.066%24 Jul
ancient13–100.019%23 Jul
anubis13–10.026%23 Jul
mirage13–7-0.036%22 Jul
nuke13–90.0213%22 Jul
dust215–15-0.019%21 Jul
ancient13–70.0214%21 Jul
nuke13–70.1117%17 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0513%16 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0411%16 Jul
dust28–130.0614%15 Jul
mirage13–20.1014%15 Jul
nuke13–80.0213%15 Jul
nuke6–130.0313%15 Jul
inferno2–7-0.028%15 Jul
nuke7–13-0.047%14 Jul
cache9–130.0212%13 Jul
mirage13–90.0113%13 Jul
cache11–13-0.067%12 Jul
inferno13–110.085%12 Jul
mirage9–3-0.050%12 Jul
mirage15–150.0310%10 Jul
ancient15–15-0.018%10 Jul
anubis13–7-0.048%10 Jul
cache15–15-0.0511%9 Jul
cache10–13-0.0015%9 Jul
cache13–4-0.018%9 Jul
mirage13–11-0.065%7 Jul
cache13–110.039%6 Jul
dust26–13-0.065%6 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0214%6 Jul
nuke13–60.0214%5 Jul
mirage13–70.0516%5 Jul
mirage13–110.029%5 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0011%5 Jul
nuke13–30.146%1 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0211%30 Jun
ancient10–130.087%27 Jun
anubis2–13-0.055%26 Jun
mirage16–140.0213%25 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0110%24 Jun
dust213–110.059%24 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0313%24 Jun
ancient9–130.0213%20 Jun
overpass15–150.056%20 Jun
nuke13–80.0611%20 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0210%19 Jun
nuke13–100.1010%19 Jun
mirage13–30.072%18 Jun
ancient13–100.069%18 Jun
inferno16–140.0210%17 Jun
overpass13–80.019%17 Jun
overpass6–130.0511%17 Jun
mirage4–130.016%17 Jun
ancient13–40.0914%17 Jun
anubis5–13-0.038%16 Jun
inferno5–130.0110%16 Jun
dust23–130.046%16 Jun
inferno13–110.0311%16 Jun
inferno16–130.1211%16 Jun
dust23–130.0612%14 Jun
nuke2–13-0.0518%14 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0510%14 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0316%14 Jun
inferno13–11-0.008%14 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0017%14 Jun
mirage13–160.048%13 Jun
dust213–16-0.0213%13 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →