Unknown Entity — CS2 Stats

76561198134085868[U:1:173820140]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

603Tracked matches63%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating14,439Blue band · top ~31.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#13030 of 19775 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning56

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–41–5Last 10054%Win rateWLLWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1

Aggression6.0

Utility4.9

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels2.5

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 650ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning5.6

Utility4.9

Mechanics6.9

Opening Duels3.0

Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time664ms−49ms

first ⅓ avg 713ms → last ⅓ avg 664ms

Headshot accuracy15.6%−2.3%

first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — cache 13–4

13–2Biggest win — mirage

8Longest win streak

6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 89% over 9dust2Weakest map · 40% over 20

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	28	16–12	57%	0.01
dust2	C	20	8–12	40%	0.00
cache	B	15	7–8	47%	0.02
anubis	S	9	8–1	89%	0.02
nuke	A	9	5–4	56%	0.01
ancient	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.00
inferno	A	8	5–3	63%	0.02
vertigo	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy

42.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

49.9%Spray accuracy

80.9%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

650msReaction time

26.2%T opening success

54.0%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

3.2%Flash assists

10.84HE damage / grenade

6.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4914 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.1606% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–10	0.00	23%	11 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.06	24%	30 Jul →
cache	14–16	-0.02	21%	26 Jul →
anubis	10–12	-0.04	24%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.01	14%	23 Jul →
anubis	3–13	0.02	5%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.07	20%	23 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	14%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	13%	21 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	24%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–4	-0.00	11%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.01	12%	21 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.03	17%	20 Jul →
cache	16–13	-0.02	21%	20 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.11	16%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.05	27%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.05	17%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–3	-0.00	7%	20 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.06	21%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.01	20%	20 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.01	15%	20 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.08	12%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	6%	19 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.01	8%	19 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.01	22%	19 Jul →
anubis	16–13	0.03	10%	19 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	17%	18 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	15%	18 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	12%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.03	11%	16 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.02	11%	16 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.02	11%	16 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	17%	16 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.05	10%	15 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.03	9%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	13%	14 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.04	11%	14 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.06	12%	14 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.03	14%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.07	10%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.08	19%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.08	10%	14 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	13%	14 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	19%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.01	10%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.07	20%	13 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.05	15%	13 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.01	10%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.01	17%	12 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.03	14%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.06	15%	12 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.09	27%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.10	15%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.02	10%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.06	24%	12 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.00	16%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.01	13%	12 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.09	17%	11 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.00	28%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.05	31%	11 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.02	24%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	24%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.03	14%	11 Jul →
cache	3–13	0.07	36%	11 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.16	24%	10 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	17%	10 Jul →
ancient	14–16	-0.02	11%	10 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.06	18%	10 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.00	15%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.10	25%	9 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	18%	9 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	10%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.02	29%	8 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.04	17%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.07	30%	8 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.11	29%	8 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	18%	5 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.05	20%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.03	14%	3 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	18%	3 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.10	21%	17 Jun →
dust2	6–10	0.01	28%	17 Jun →
nuke	10–13	0.06	18%	13 Jun →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	14%	13 Jun →
cache	8–13	-0.04	9%	12 Jun →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	13%	12 Jun →
nuke	13–2	0.11	12%	12 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.02	16%	12 Jun →
mirage	0–7	-0.05	25%	12 Jun →
vertigo	11–13	-0.02	12%	11 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.06	31%	11 Jun →
mirage	12–12	-0.07	7%	11 Jun →
ancient	2–3	-0.04	0%	11 Jun →
dust2	13–3	-0.00	19%	11 Jun →
vertigo	9–13	-0.04	16%	11 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.00	16%	11 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.02	8%	8 Jun →
nuke	10–13	0.04	18%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.03	19%	7 Jun →
vertigo	13–6	0.03	27%	7 Jun →