ibis — CS2 Stats

76561198133777752[U:1:173512024]

1,147Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,454Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,798Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#7315 of 29429 tracked

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=862), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 6 median	Level 7 median	vs Level 7
Headshot rate	45.4%	44.9%	46.2%	meets
Shot accuracy	19.1%	11.8%	12.5%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.92	1.04	1.06	0.14 short
Match win rate	46.2%	45.3%	45.9%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning51

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT47–49–4Last 10047%Win rateTWLWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9

Aggression9.5

Utility6.0

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels4.3

Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning5.1

Utility6.0

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels4.3

Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time540ms−77ms

first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms

Headshot accuracy18.1%−5.6%

first ⅓ avg 23.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 10–13

13–0Biggest win — dust2

6Longest win streak

5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 61% over 33infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	33	20–13	61%	-0.01
mirage	B	28	13–15	46%	0.01
cache	C	13	5–8	38%	0.00
nuke	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.00
inferno	D	7	2–5	29%	0.02
ancient	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
office	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.03
anubis	—	3	1–2	33%	0.02
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

85,955Lifetime kills

0.92K/D

4,255Matches

46.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players

45.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players

19.1%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 6 players

12,084MVPs

2,380Hours (in match)

3,840Bombs planted

2,072Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,796

M4A4 / M4A1-S12,449

AWP12,314

Desert Eagle7,466

P2000 / USP-S5,999

Glock-184,201

P2502,053

SSG 081,827

FAMAS1,776

Galil AR1,661

Lifetime map wins

15,314dust2

4,175inferno

1,789train

1,634nuke

1,526vertigo

613cbble

215office

111safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

253Matches

55%Win rate

0.84Avg K/D

67.7ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	1	0%	0.72	13.0
Mirage	1	100%	0.74	14.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy

40.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.2%Spray accuracy

82.2%Counter-strafing

8.3°Preaim

513msReaction time

34.5%T opening success

60.2%CT opening success

0.74Enemies flashed / flash

6.6%Flash assists

11.02HE damage / grenade

16.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.5434% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	15–15	-0.03	23%	29 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.06	16%	29 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.08	17%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.00	12%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.06	23%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.09	20%	27 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.01	33%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.04	21%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.04	22%	25 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	23%	25 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.08	15%	23 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.06	14%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.06	18%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.01	23%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.07	7%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.08	21%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.04	4%	20 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	17%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	13%	19 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.00	19%	19 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.06	14%	19 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	26%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.04	24%	18 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.14	18%	15 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.00	11%	15 Aug →
dust2	7–0	0.13	29%	15 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.01	10%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.05	17%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	15%	13 Aug →
ancient	12–16	0.01	19%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	25%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.02	21%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–0	-0.02	9%	6 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.06	21%	6 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.00	19%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–2	-0.01	6%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	12%	3 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	10%	2 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	26%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	15%	2 Aug →
office	8–13	0.00	43%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.03	22%	1 Aug →
mirage	9–1	0.04	19%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.06	31%	1 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	21%	1 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.00	28%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.06	22%	31 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.08	17%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	10%	29 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.03	21%	27 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.02	31%	27 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.01	28%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.03	19%	26 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	24%	26 Jul →
dust2	12–12	-0.05	15%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.05	24%	23 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	22%	23 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.00	10%	22 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.01	21%	22 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.09	17%	22 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	16%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	29%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	19%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.04	35%	20 Jul →
office	5–13	-0.07	36%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	13%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.02	32%	18 Jul →
vertigo	9–13	0.02	18%	13 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.02	29%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	17%	8 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	21%	8 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.04	11%	8 Jul →
nuke	16–13	0.01	21%	3 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	22%	3 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.03	24%	29 Jun →
cache	3–13	-0.06	54%	29 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.02	25%	28 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	20%	28 Jun →
mirage	9–0	0.09	25%	26 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	22%	26 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.03	21%	26 Jun →
office	13–10	-0.03	16%	26 Jun →
dust2	1–13	-0.04	24%	25 Jun →
anubis	13–16	0.10	18%	25 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	15%	25 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	29%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.05	29%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.05	25%	23 Jun →
nuke	14–16	0.00	27%	23 Jun →
cache	5–13	0.03	25%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.01	16%	21 Jun →
cache	13–3	0.01	26%	21 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	31%	21 Jun →
anubis	7–13	-0.00	24%	20 Jun →
cache	3–13	-0.05	16%	13 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	28%	12 Jun →
cache	6–13	0.05	20%	12 Jun →
dust2	3–13	-0.06	33%	6 Jun →
cache	12–12	-0.01	23%	5 Jun →
dust2	13–1	0.05	27%	5 Jun →