AlchemySL

AlchemySL — CS2 Stats

US76561198129383925[U:1:169118197]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

578Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
8,203Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 Developing
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAlchemySLFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning46
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41554Last 10041%Win rateLWWWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.0
Aggression6.6
Utility7.1
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 684ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning4.6
Utility7.1
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time691ms+30ms
first ⅓ avg 661ms → last ⅓ avg 691ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — inferno 13–2
131Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 15ancientWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC29121741%0.01
dust2B24111346%0.02
infernoA159660%0.03
ancientC135838%-0.00
nuke4040%-0.00
overpass42250%-0.01
vertigo31233%-0.03
anubis31233%0.02
train3030%-0.06
grail2020%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

329,625Lifetime kills
0.69K/D
16,747Matches
29.6%Match win rate
50.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
17.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
10,993MVPs
4,411Hours (in match)
2,765Bombs planted
979Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4799,725
AWP24,738
P25017,326
Glock-1810,443
SSG 086,958

Lifetime map wins

8,851inferno
7,982dust2
3,319vertigo
2,258nuke
1,366train
788cbble
398office
220lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

269Matches
51%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
64.1ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
8%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage617%0.6210.5
Vertigo367%0.8716.0
Anubis250%0.7815.0
Dust22100%1.1211.0
Train1100%0.406.0
Ancient1100%1.0014.0
Nuke1100%0.539.0
Inferno10%0.6210.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
29.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
684msReaction time
28.1%T opening success
51.7%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
9.08HE damage / grenade
23.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.0855% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–16-0.0426%10 Jul
dust213–110.0325%1 Mar
mirage13–50.0635%1 Mar
inferno16–140.0216%1 Mar
vertigo8–13-0.0713%31 Jan
dust213–100.0117%31 Jan
dust211–130.0417%28 Jan
dust28–130.0119%28 Jan
mirage7–130.0818%28 Jan
inferno13–20.1821%26 Jan
anubis13–90.0415%26 Jan
nuke13–16-0.0315%26 Jan
mirage13–10.1617%26 Jan
dust213–10-0.0215%26 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0733%26 Jan
anubis12–160.0121%26 Jan
dust23–130.0924%26 Jan
mirage13–110.0214%19 Jan
inferno11–130.0113%19 Jan
mirage14–160.0217%19 Jan
inferno9–130.0723%19 Jan
ancient10–130.0219%19 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0338%19 Jan
mirage13–90.0013%19 Jan
dust213–70.0819%19 Jan
ancient8–13-0.0417%19 Jan
dust27–130.0521%19 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0215%19 Jan
inferno13–100.0127%19 Jan
nuke11–130.0427%19 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0313%19 Jan
overpass13–100.0023%19 Jan
ancient4–13-0.0529%18 Jan
inferno14–160.0819%18 Jan
overpass15–150.0022%18 Jan
mirage13–60.0824%18 Jan
inferno13–70.0318%18 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0119%18 Jan
overpass4–13-0.0525%18 Jan
dust29–130.0025%18 Jan
nuke3–130.0318%18 Jan
inferno16–140.0619%17 Jan
mirage13–60.0811%17 Jan
dust213–11-0.0218%17 Jan
dust23–130.0115%13 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0020%13 Jan
dust213–60.0824%13 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0226%13 Jan
dust213–4-0.0316%29 Dec
mirage13–7-0.0118%29 Dec
train8–13-0.0617%29 Dec
mirage16–12-0.0216%29 Dec
mirage11–13-0.0016%29 Dec
dust29–130.1216%29 Nov
dust23–13-0.0411%29 Nov
ancient13–80.0512%27 Nov
mirage13–80.0024%28 Oct
inferno11–13-0.0115%28 Oct
dust28–13-0.0124%27 Oct
mirage9–130.0423%27 Oct
dust213–80.0426%16 Oct
mirage1–13-0.0430%16 Oct
ancient14–16-0.0022%13 Oct
inferno10–30.0216%12 Oct
mirage3–13-0.0212%12 Oct
vertigo2–13-0.0421%11 Oct
dust26–13-0.0215%11 Oct
dust216–13-0.0518%31 Aug
dust210–130.0118%31 Aug
train3–13-0.0229%31 Aug
overpass13–110.0125%31 Aug
dust213–8-0.0827%31 Aug
mirage13–70.0122%31 Aug
mirage13–60.0429%30 Aug
vertigo13–50.0425%25 Aug
dust213–50.0632%25 Aug
inferno13–70.0244%19 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0118%18 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0328%18 Aug
dust211–130.0729%18 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0719%18 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0822%18 Aug
ancient13–90.0118%23 Jul
nuke12–12-0.0614%23 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0220%13 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0622%13 Jul
ancient13–110.0219%7 Jul
ancient13–60.0514%6 Jul
mirage9–130.0219%30 Jun
grail10–130.039%11 May
grail3–13-0.0110%11 May
mirage12–3-0.0617%11 May
inferno13–100.0743%8 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0225%8 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0510%8 Feb
ancient8–130.0633%8 Feb
train2–13-0.084%8 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0327%26 Jan
anubis10–13-0.0118%26 Jan
mirage12–12-0.0027%25 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →