Merlin — CS2 Stats

76561198123712580[U:1:163446852]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

753Tracked matches44%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62

Positioning50

Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44–46–10Last 10044%Win rateTLLLTWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.2

Aggression6.5

Utility3.6

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels2.5

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 632ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2

Positioning5.0

Utility3.6

Mechanics6.0

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact3.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time644ms+40ms

first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms

Headshot accuracy17.1%+1.7%

first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — ancient 13–6

13–3Biggest win — cache

7Longest win streak

5–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 10mirageWeakest map · 36% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	C	39	17–22	44%	-0.01
mirage	C	14	5–9	36%	-0.03
nuke	A	10	6–4	60%	-0.01
office	B	8	4–4	50%	0.05
train	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.01
dust2	C	5	2–3	40%	0.00
ancient	C	5	2–3	40%	0.03
vertigo	—	4	2–2	50%	0.04
warden	—	2	1–1	50%	0.02
anubis	—	2	1–1	50%	0.02
inferno	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.02
stronghold	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

64Matches

50%Win rate

1.09Avg K/D

—ADR

32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy

36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.0%Spray accuracy

77.0%Counter-strafing

11.0°Preaim

632msReaction time

31.9%T opening success

47.7%CT opening success

0.41Enemies flashed / flash

3.6%Flash assists

10.47HE damage / grenade

11.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4109 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.9375% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	12–12	-0.04	8%	18 Jul →
dust2	0–7	-0.01	0%	18 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.00	11%	18 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	26%	14 Jul →
dust2	12–12	-0.04	13%	14 Jul →
office	13–9	0.02	18%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	11%	7 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.04	26%	7 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.00	33%	7 Jul →
train	4–13	-0.05	33%	6 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	16%	2 Jul →
cache	1–13	0.03	53%	2 Jul →
warden	11–8	0.03	12%	29 Jun →
dust2	12–12	0.02	14%	29 Jun →
office	12–12	0.03	23%	29 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.17	14%	29 Jun →
nuke	12–12	0.01	13%	29 Jun →
vertigo	13–11	-0.00	21%	29 Jun →
cache	9–13	-0.00	7%	29 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.07	17%	28 Jun →
stronghold	11–13	0.02	25%	28 Jun →
vertigo	13–9	0.08	9%	28 Jun →
cache	13–10	-0.02	20%	28 Jun →
cache	8–13	0.02	22%	28 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.01	11%	24 Jun →
ancient	6–13	0.04	16%	24 Jun →
office	13–8	0.08	16%	23 Jun →
nuke	13–8	-0.03	12%	22 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.01	12%	22 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	12%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.09	10%	22 Jun →
cache	5–13	0.04	12%	22 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.11	18%	22 May →
cache	12–7	0.01	11%	22 May →
warden	8–13	0.00	0%	21 May →
anubis	7–13	0.03	35%	21 May →
cache	13–7	-0.06	16%	21 May →
cache	13–10	0.03	22%	21 May →
cache	7–13	-0.04	15%	21 May →
cache	13–8	0.04	12%	21 May →
cache	13–10	-0.00	13%	21 May →
cache	12–12	-0.02	10%	20 May →
cache	6–13	0.03	38%	20 May →
cache	9–13	-0.00	13%	20 May →
cache	13–4	0.06	18%	20 May →
office	7–13	0.09	20%	19 May →
office	13–5	0.08	36%	19 May →
mirage	11–4	-0.08	15%	19 May →
cache	13–7	0.12	14%	10 May →
cache	7–13	0.04	19%	10 May →
cache	8–13	-0.05	20%	10 May →
cache	5–13	-0.02	25%	9 May →
train	9–13	-0.01	12%	9 May →
cache	7–13	-0.05	22%	9 May →
cache	12–12	0.00	24%	9 May →
train	7–13	-0.01	10%	5 May →
cache	13–11	0.00	14%	4 May →
cache	13–10	-0.05	0%	1 May →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	6%	1 May →
cache	7–13	-0.05	17%	30 Apr →
cache	8–13	-0.07	5%	30 Apr →
cache	13–7	-0.02	10%	30 Apr →
cache	8–13	0.04	31%	30 Apr →
cache	13–6	-0.06	6%	30 Apr →
cache	13–11	0.08	9%	30 Apr →
cache	13–10	-0.05	16%	29 Apr →
cache	13–3	-0.01	13%	29 Apr →
cache	4–13	-0.08	17%	29 Apr →
cache	13–10	0.02	20%	29 Apr →
cache	12–12	-0.04	20%	29 Apr →
cache	13–10	-0.03	18%	29 Apr →
cache	10–13	0.01	12%	29 Apr →
cache	8–13	0.00	35%	29 Apr →
cache	10–13	-0.05	18%	28 Apr →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	18%	26 Apr →
train	6–13	-0.05	9%	24 Apr →
train	13–7	0.02	10%	24 Apr →
train	13–10	0.03	18%	24 Apr →
mirage	1–13	-0.03	6%	23 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	8%	23 Apr →
ancient	12–12	-0.01	24%	23 Apr →
train	13–9	-0.02	15%	23 Apr →
nuke	12–12	-0.01	23%	23 Apr →
nuke	6–3	-0.05	6%	23 Apr →
nuke	13–5	-0.05	10%	20 Apr →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	8%	16 Apr →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	15%	16 Apr →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	12%	16 Apr →
nuke	13–7	0.05	21%	15 Apr →
mirage	13–4	0.01	12%	15 Apr →
office	7–13	0.05	9%	15 Apr →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	14%	15 Apr →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	10%	13 Apr →
train	13–6	-0.01	14%	13 Apr →
office	9–1	0.06	8%	13 Apr →
office	11–13	0.00	11%	13 Apr →
vertigo	10–13	0.04	27%	13 Apr →
vertigo	11–13	0.04	31%	12 Apr →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	19%	11 Apr →
dust2	13–11	-0.06	11%	11 Apr →