Saud bin Abdulaziz Al Saud

Saud bin Abdulaziz Al Saud — CS2 Stats

76561198123270222[U:1:163004494]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,413Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 Developing
Premier CS Rating18,490Purple band · top ~14.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5209 of 9722 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,373 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSaud bin Abdulaziz Al SaudFACEITLevel 7 · 1,373 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,490 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning45
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49465Last 10049%Win rateWWLLWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.2
Aggression3.2
Utility6.1
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.5
Utility6.1
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time639ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 639ms
Headshot accuracy12.7%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 12.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — cache 13–6
133Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
611In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 10mirageWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA32181456%-0.00
anubisB147750%-0.01
dust2C135838%-0.01
mirageD124833%-0.02
cacheA106460%0.03
nukeA74357%-0.03
infernoD62433%-0.02
overpassA53260%-0.02
poseidon1010%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

654Matches
51%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
75.7ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient12058%1.0314.8
Anubis10558%1.0714.3
Nuke5746%0.8213.8
Dust24134%0.7713.6
Vertigo3751%1.0016.0
Train3563%0.9515.2
Inferno3228%0.8313.3
Mirage2846%0.9713.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.1%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
79.8%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
635msReaction time
21.0%T opening success
41.4%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
12.44HE damage / grenade
3.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.0754% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.9403 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.048% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–7-0.0521%27 Aug
anubis13–90.1022%25 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0011%24 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0630%24 Aug
ancient13–40.0614%16 Aug
cache13–60.0514%16 Aug
cache5–13-0.0312%9 Aug
ancient13–40.0811%9 Aug
dust210–13-0.0111%26 Jul
ancient1–13-0.080%26 Jul
ancient13–50.0012%26 Jul
mirage13–4-0.034%26 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0316%26 Jul
cache7–13-0.058%26 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0213%26 Jul
dust213–70.0212%26 Jul
mirage11–130.0317%26 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0215%23 Jul
anubis13–10-0.059%23 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0215%22 Jul
mirage13–11-0.049%20 Jul
cache13–60.1217%20 Jul
ancient4–13-0.026%18 Jul
cache13–70.018%18 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0516%18 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0114%18 Jul
mirage11–130.0115%18 Jul
cache13–60.044%18 Jul
ancient13–50.0114%17 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0412%17 Jul
ancient8–130.0212%15 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0511%15 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0013%14 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0315%13 Jul
dust27–13-0.0715%11 Jul
ancient16–140.027%21 Jun
dust211–130.0313%21 Jun
inferno7–13-0.1113%21 Jun
nuke13–8-0.009%18 Jun
ancient13–70.0120%18 Jun
overpass13–7-0.0816%16 Jun
dust23–13-0.0719%16 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0417%14 Jun
anubis8–130.0314%2 Jun
ancient4–13-0.026%31 May
overpass13–6-0.0015%31 May
anubis16–13-0.029%29 May
dust29–13-0.068%29 May
ancient11–130.0115%26 May
mirage10–130.0219%17 May
nuke16–130.0921%17 May
anubis8–13-0.056%13 May
dust213–100.0322%12 May
poseidon4–9-0.1119%12 May
ancient15–15-0.0014%10 May
nuke13–9-0.029%10 May
cache12–120.0615%10 May
mirage7–13-0.0516%10 May
mirage4–13-0.1211%5 May
ancient11–130.0120%5 May
ancient13–6-0.036%3 May
cache13–10-0.025%3 May
cache13–70.0113%3 May
cache7–130.078%3 May
inferno5–130.0620%25 Apr
dust215–15-0.1011%25 Apr
overpass6–13-0.0312%18 Apr
anubis11–130.029%18 Apr
dust213–9-0.0317%14 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0627%9 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0016%8 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0515%4 Apr
overpass15–150.0218%4 Apr
anubis16–12-0.0220%4 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0111%4 Apr
dust213–10-0.0421%4 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0618%4 Apr
mirage13–100.0216%4 Apr
dust26–13-0.0414%4 Apr
ancient16–14-0.035%29 Mar
dust23–130.1018%29 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0115%29 Mar
nuke6–13-0.1222%28 Mar
nuke7–2-0.070%28 Mar
ancient13–30.058%28 Mar
ancient13–100.0311%28 Mar
inferno13–90.0118%25 Mar
inferno13–5-0.0417%23 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0217%23 Mar
nuke7–13-0.008%22 Mar
ancient13–70.0213%22 Mar
overpass16–14-0.0018%17 Mar
ancient8–130.058%15 Mar
ancient13–100.0213%15 Mar
mirage13–110.0111%14 Mar
ancient13–6-0.066%10 Mar
anubis13–60.0013%10 Mar
dust213–80.1018%10 Mar
ancient13–90.0714%7 Mar
mirage11–130.0115%7 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →