Johnny Salami — CS2 Stats

76561198013080628[U:1:52814900]

4,534Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,394Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2090 of 8022 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

23,394Peak Premier on CSDB
1,671Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,671
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 80 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,394
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,606 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJohnny SalamiPREMIER23,394 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,671csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning49
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47521Last 10047%Win rateLWWWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.6
Aggression5.9
Utility4.6
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning4.9
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time607ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy26.5%+7.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 26.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — cache 13–10
132Biggest win — anubis
4Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 86% over 7dust2Weakest map · 29% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC2491538%0.02
cacheB20101050%0.02
dust2D1751229%0.01
mirageA138562%-0.00
nukeC94544%-0.01
infernoC83538%0.00
anubisS76186%0.02
debris110100%0.11
vertigo110100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,426Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
80.6ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient47555%1.1117.0
Anubis41154%1.1116.7
Mirage22945%1.0215.0
Nuke22144%1.0416.6
Dust219243%1.0715.9
Vertigo17250%1.0616.7
Inferno17041%0.9615.4
Train11755%1.1317.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.7%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
599msReaction time
29.2%T opening success
46.4%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
5.70HE damage / grenade
11.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.1958% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache10–13-0.0140%27 Aug
anubis13–70.0830%27 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0122%26 Aug
debris9–20.1150%26 Aug
nuke3–9-0.0930%26 Aug
anubis13–30.1226%25 Aug
cache4–130.0430%24 Aug
inferno11–130.0111%24 Aug
ancient5–130.0630%24 Aug
cache13–10-0.0532%23 Aug
dust23–9-0.016%23 Aug
mirage13–70.0427%21 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0327%20 Aug
dust211–13-0.0420%20 Aug
dust213–70.1033%20 Aug
dust29–130.0334%20 Aug
ancient12–160.0530%18 Aug
inferno9–130.0230%18 Aug
dust213–8-0.0214%17 Aug
ancient13–40.0528%16 Aug
cache13–60.0226%16 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0127%15 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0238%15 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0416%15 Aug
dust213–60.0525%15 Aug
dust23–13-0.0720%15 Aug
cache10–13-0.0813%12 Aug
dust29–13-0.0425%10 Aug
dust26–13-0.0021%8 Aug
ancient6–9-0.0515%7 Aug
mirage16–130.0130%7 Aug
cache13–11-0.0032%6 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0635%6 Aug
anubis6–130.0433%5 Aug
cache15–15-0.0326%5 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0023%4 Aug
cache6–130.0035%4 Aug
dust213–40.0823%3 Aug
anubis13–110.0423%3 Aug
vertigo13–110.0827%31 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0527%31 Jul
mirage13–90.0016%30 Jul
ancient10–130.0530%30 Jul
nuke7–130.0132%30 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0121%29 Jul
nuke6–130.0132%29 Jul
cache9–130.0020%29 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0322%29 Jul
ancient13–100.0230%28 Jul
ancient13–30.0524%28 Jul
ancient13–60.0920%28 Jul
mirage11–130.0228%28 Jul
nuke13–60.0225%28 Jul
cache13–90.1026%28 Jul
dust24–13-0.0432%28 Jul
dust22–130.0026%28 Jul
cache13–60.0816%28 Jul
cache13–8-0.0010%28 Jul
mirage13–60.0527%26 Jul
cache8–130.0324%26 Jul
ancient13–70.1324%26 Jul
dust213–30.1526%26 Jul
dust210–130.0322%26 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0920%26 Jul
ancient13–50.0825%26 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0326%26 Jul
dust23–13-0.0319%25 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0223%25 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0030%25 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0215%24 Jul
ancient14–160.0315%23 Jul
nuke13–50.0118%23 Jul
cache5–130.0432%23 Jul
ancient13–80.0416%22 Jul
cache9–130.0423%22 Jul
cache13–50.0822%22 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0223%22 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0628%22 Jul
nuke1–13-0.0411%21 Jul
inferno9–60.0521%21 Jul
dust21–13-0.049%21 Jul
mirage13–40.035%21 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0413%20 Jul
cache13–6-0.0217%20 Jul
inferno13–80.0534%18 Jul
dust210–13-0.0110%18 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0415%18 Jul
anubis13–2-0.0422%18 Jul
cache13–100.1524%18 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0729%18 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0315%18 Jul
cache13–7-0.0123%18 Jul
ancient10–130.1016%18 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0015%18 Jul
mirage11–130.0013%18 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0128%17 Jul
cache6–13-0.0516%15 Jul
ancient13–70.0714%15 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0319%15 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0216%15 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →