PENAR TAKER

PENAR TAKER — CS2 Stats

US76561198122516997[U:1:162251269]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

361Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
833Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 Developing
Premier CS Rating4,427Grey band · top ~81.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11623 of 15180 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPENAR TAKERFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER4,427 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning54
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41563Last 10041%Win rateLWWLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.3
Aggression6.7
Utility5.7
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.80 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 671ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning5.4
Utility5.7
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact6.2

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time665ms−75ms
first ⅓ avg 741ms → last ⅓ avg 665ms
Headshot accuracy9.0%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 8.9% → last ⅓ avg 9.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — ancient 13–11
131Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 12anubisWeakest map · 17% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2691735%-0.02
mirageC2291341%-0.02
cacheB137654%-0.02
anubisD1221017%-0.04
ancientS128467%-0.02
nukeC83538%-0.02
infernoD62433%0.00
overpass110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

16,534Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
990Matches
41.8%Match win rate
30.3%Headshot %
11.6%Shot accuracy
1,653MVPs
367Hours (in match)
827Bombs planted
192Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,456dust2
866inferno
791nuke
63train
52lake
41vertigo
24safehouse
22cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

17Matches
59%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
69.7ADR
26%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
43%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Cache580%1.0213.8
Dust2450%0.7811.0
Mirage450%0.9313.0
Anubis20%0.7011.0
Ancient1100%0.5910.0
Vertigo1100%0.295.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.5%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
74.3%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
671msReaction time
39.2%T opening success
47.1%CT opening success
0.80Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
7.32HE damage / grenade
10.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.4804% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.2046% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–130.0413%27 Aug
dust213–70.0517%27 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0111%26 Aug
anubis6–13-0.069%8 Aug
dust26–13-0.087%8 Aug
inferno8–13-0.070%8 Aug
dust213–5-0.065%7 Aug
mirage13–1-0.015%5 Aug
inferno13–50.0510%5 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0318%5 Aug
dust211–13-0.056%4 Aug
inferno13–80.0315%3 Aug
mirage13–50.0512%3 Aug
dust213–11-0.0711%2 Aug
ancient13–4-0.029%2 Aug
ancient10–5-0.085%2 Aug
anubis11–13-0.035%2 Aug
dust213–10-0.018%2 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0311%2 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0911%2 Aug
ancient13–70.0710%1 Aug
inferno15–150.109%1 Aug
dust29–130.0817%1 Aug
nuke12–160.069%1 Aug
cache9–130.0110%1 Aug
dust28–13-0.0811%30 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0210%27 Jul
cache4–13-0.096%27 Jul
mirage13–50.078%27 Jul
dust213–6-0.046%27 Jul
nuke13–10-0.120%27 Jul
anubis2–13-0.077%27 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0410%27 Jul
cache16–140.0111%27 Jul
mirage8–13-0.068%27 Jul
cache8–130.0112%27 Jul
mirage3–13-0.104%26 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0110%26 Jul
ancient13–110.159%26 Jul
mirage4–13-0.094%26 Jul
dust25–13-0.0013%26 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0310%26 Jul
dust214–16-0.0012%26 Jul
ancient13–16-0.067%25 Jul
dust28–13-0.0312%22 Jul
mirage13–80.109%22 Jul
dust213–5-0.019%22 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0412%20 Jul
inferno7–13-0.044%20 Jul
dust212–16-0.084%19 Jul
mirage13–30.005%19 Jul
mirage13–16-0.077%19 Jul
dust28–130.0211%19 Jul
dust213–8-0.069%19 Jul
nuke13–11-0.048%19 Jul
dust28–13-0.0119%19 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0510%19 Jul
cache8–13-0.012%19 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0314%18 Jul
mirage13–50.048%18 Jul
mirage7–13-0.065%18 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0310%18 Jul
mirage8–13-0.047%18 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0512%18 Jul
mirage3–13-0.068%18 Jul
cache16–140.022%17 Jul
dust211–13-0.022%17 Jul
cache13–110.0411%17 Jul
ancient11–130.0214%17 Jul
dust211–130.0114%16 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0311%16 Jul
mirage13–110.0010%15 Jul
cache10–1-0.070%14 Jul
cache13–11-0.059%14 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0212%14 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0810%14 Jul
dust213–100.0316%14 Jul
anubis7–13-0.073%13 Jul
dust23–13-0.0718%11 Jul
cache4–13-0.0211%11 Jul
cache13–11-0.0110%11 Jul
dust213–70.0314%11 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0210%10 Jul
anubis13–11-0.034%10 Jul
mirage10–13-0.039%6 Jul
dust214–16-0.039%5 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0310%5 Jul
dust26–13-0.0716%3 Jul
anubis4–13-0.022%3 Jul
dust210–13-0.048%3 Jul
cache7–13-0.019%2 Jul
cache13–3-0.054%2 Jul
anubis9–13-0.063%2 Jul
overpass13–7-0.0212%2 Jul
anubis0–7-0.020%2 Jul
inferno7–13-0.058%2 Jul
anubis9–13-0.052%1 Jul
ancient13–6-0.062%1 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0010%1 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0112%30 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →