dzef — CS2 Stats

76561198114850644[U:1:154584916]

1,374Tracked matches73%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.2 StrongHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,027 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning54

Utility79

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–39–5Last 10056%Win rateWLWWLWTTTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6

Aggression6.0

Utility7.9

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.0

Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 79 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning5.4

Utility7.9

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels2.6

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.03

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time522ms−86ms

first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 522ms

Headshot accuracy19.5%−0.4%

first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — cache 13–4

13–1Biggest win — overpass

8Longest win streak

15–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 31anubisWeakest map · 36% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	S	31	20–11	65%	-0.01
ancient	A	19	11–8	58%	-0.01
mirage	A	17	10–7	59%	-0.02
anubis	C	14	5–9	36%	-0.02
dust2	A	7	4–3	57%	0.01
cache	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.03
nuke	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.02
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,341Matches

52%Win rate

0.86Avg K/D

69.2ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

17Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	343	56%	0.86	13.2
Ancient	304	52%	0.87	13.5
Dust2	184	46%	0.88	14.0
Mirage	184	54%	0.88	13.2
Nuke	98	50%	0.79	12.0
Anubis	97	46%	0.88	14.5
Overpass	82	56%	0.88	13.2
Cache	25	36%	0.63	9.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy

36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.5%Spray accuracy

82.7%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

523msReaction time

25.8%T opening success

50.6%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

10.1%Flash assists

12.74HE damage / grenade

14.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.7778% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–9	-0.02	30%	25 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.02	21%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.07	14%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	25%	24 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.01	20%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	24%	23 Aug →
cache	12–12	-0.08	15%	23 Aug →
nuke	12–12	-0.03	24%	23 Aug →
inferno	12–12	0.06	17%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.03	22%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.08	21%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	19%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.07	20%	22 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.09	14%	21 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.08	10%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.03	16%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.03	23%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.06	18%	21 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.11	13%	21 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.01	19%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.06	15%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.09	19%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.05	24%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.00	18%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	19%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.01	26%	20 Aug →
mirage	16–12	-0.00	17%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.01	30%	19 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.04	19%	19 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	15%	19 Aug →
inferno	16–14	-0.03	19%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	26%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	14%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	14%	18 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.11	17%	18 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.01	11%	18 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	15%	16 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.07	14%	16 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.06	19%	16 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	13%	15 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.05	17%	15 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	19%	15 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	13%	15 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	10%	15 Aug →
anubis	12–16	-0.03	14%	15 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	16%	15 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.06	28%	14 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.02	29%	14 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	21%	14 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	25%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.06	26%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	24%	11 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	21%	11 Aug →
inferno	16–12	-0.04	23%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	32%	10 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.00	14%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	3%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	13%	8 Aug →
inferno	25–23	-0.00	22%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.04	9%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	21%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	33%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.05	24%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.04	8%	3 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.06	23%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	25%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.05	28%	2 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.08	18%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	27%	2 Aug →
ancient	16–19	-0.05	16%	2 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.06	15%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.04	14%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	18%	1 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	18%	1 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.08	21%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.00	29%	1 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	24%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.03	22%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	13%	29 Jul →
ancient	16–14	0.03	19%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.05	12%	28 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	21%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.09	19%	27 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.07	11%	27 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	28%	13 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.02	27%	13 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	27%	13 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	23%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	15%	10 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	11%	10 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	11%	10 Jul →
inferno	16–14	-0.08	23%	9 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.01	15%	5 Jul →
anubis	19–17	-0.04	16%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.02	38%	5 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.00	19%	5 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.01	17%	4 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.05	15%	4 Jul →
overpass	13–1	0.07	24%	4 Jul →
inferno	16–12	-0.04	31%	1 Jul →