boid

boid — CS2 Stats

76561198109317123[U:1:149051395]Steam profile ↗

1,857Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,121Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4218 of 21910 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,589 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGboidFACEITLevel 8 · 1,589 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,121 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning49
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53398Last 10053%Win rateWWLWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.2
Aggression3.4
Utility4.8
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning4.9
Utility4.8
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact8.1

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time541ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — nuke 13–11
130Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
1010In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8cacheWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A1911858%0.00
cacheD1861233%-0.02
mirageA1810856%0.01
nukeA1610663%0.00
ancientB147750%0.01
anubisS86275%0.01
inferno3030%0.00
office21150%-0.01
train110100%-0.03
overpass110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

478Matches
51%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
77.6ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10546%0.9715.0
Anubis7454%1.1015.5
Vertigo6343%0.9814.8
Nuke5155%1.1517.2
Ancient4154%0.9614.7
Dust22756%1.0514.4
Overpass2646%0.9113.7
Inferno2635%0.8413.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.3%Spray accuracy
86.6%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
531msReaction time
28.3%T opening success
37.3%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
7.01HE damage / grenade
11.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.2797% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–60.0634%25 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0133%25 Aug
cache8–130.0323%25 Aug
anubis13–110.0116%25 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0018%24 Aug
mirage13–90.0418%24 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0017%24 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0723%24 Aug
cache9–13-0.0318%24 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0016%24 Aug
nuke12–120.0114%20 Aug
dust213–4-0.036%20 Aug
ancient13–80.0412%20 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0424%20 Aug
anubis13–20.0315%19 Aug
cache10–13-0.0613%19 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0422%19 Aug
ancient13–80.0018%19 Aug
cache9–130.0720%19 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0712%19 Aug
ancient13–40.0314%14 Aug
mirage15–150.0320%14 Aug
dust216–14-0.0213%14 Aug
dust211–130.0225%12 Aug
nuke10–130.0321%12 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0532%10 Aug
cache3–0-0.0650%10 Aug
dust212–160.0221%4 Aug
cache13–80.0115%4 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0629%29 Jul
dust23–13-0.0318%29 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0411%29 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0021%29 Jul
mirage13–60.0720%29 Jul
cache13–10-0.0617%28 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0215%28 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0221%28 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0216%28 Jul
mirage13–100.0118%27 Jul
dust210–130.0818%26 Jul
ancient13–70.0725%26 Jul
anubis16–130.0623%26 Jul
cache13–16-0.0413%26 Jul
mirage15–150.0515%23 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0316%23 Jul
dust213–110.0416%22 Jul
cache2–13-0.0119%19 Jul
nuke11–130.0123%15 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0221%15 Jul
nuke9–130.0214%15 Jul
dust213–30.0113%13 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0226%12 Jul
nuke13–40.0041%12 Jul
dust24–13-0.0720%12 Jul
cache7–13-0.0320%12 Jul
nuke13–110.0818%12 Jul
cache12–12-0.0817%7 Jul
office7–13-0.0524%29 Jun
ancient8–130.0127%29 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0127%29 Jun
ancient5–130.039%29 Jun
dust213–8-0.0315%25 Jun
dust213–110.0623%11 Jun
mirage10–130.0625%11 Jun
mirage13–80.0621%11 Jun
nuke13–110.1117%11 Jun
ancient13–0-0.0114%11 Jun
dust26–13-0.0426%11 Jun
anubis13–50.0124%11 Jun
nuke14–16-0.0520%10 Jun
mirage9–130.0520%5 Jun
dust213–110.0530%31 May
office13–110.0347%31 May
cache13–90.0626%29 May
dust25–130.0328%29 May
nuke3–13-0.0711%29 May
train13–5-0.0362%29 May
dust216–120.0121%8 May
cache13–9-0.0222%8 May
cache13–9-0.064%8 May
mirage16–13-0.0223%5 May
cache11–13-0.0321%3 May
anubis13–80.0619%3 May
cache9–13-0.0238%29 Apr
cache12–12-0.0111%29 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0014%29 Apr
cache11–13-0.0512%29 Apr
overpass13–110.0926%27 Apr
ancient16–120.0227%27 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0126%22 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0016%22 Apr
nuke13–100.0117%21 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0123%21 Apr
dust27–130.0119%21 Apr
ancient12–120.0114%15 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0110%15 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0015%13 Apr
dust213–10-0.0611%12 Apr
inferno12–120.079%12 Apr
dust213–8-0.0213%12 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →