The Lazy Crow — CS2 Stats

76561198106989905[U:1:146724177]

1,355Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,117Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,973Purple band · top ~16.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24017 of 49122 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,966), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate34.8%47.0%48.5%13.7% short
Shot accuracy18.9%12.7%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio0.961.071.070.11 short
Match win rate42.2%46.4%47.0%4.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGThe Lazy CrowFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER17,973 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning44
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY6733Last 10067%Win rateWLLWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression5.8
Utility5.1
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.1

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.4
Utility5.1
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time613ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 655ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%+4.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — inferno 13–4
130Biggest win — dust2
14Longest win streak
74In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 87% over 15mirageWeakest map · 58% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A31191261%0.04
nukeS1711665%0.03
infernoS1513287%0.07
ancientS139469%0.06
mirageA127558%0.01
cacheS75271%0.01
anubisA53260%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (58% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

145,270Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
7,044Matches
42.2%Match win rate
34.8%Headshot %
18.9%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 8 players
17,622MVPs
2,864Hours (in match)
5,827Bombs planted
1,838Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP37,714
AK-4730,508
P906,584
Knife3,473
P2502,976

Lifetime map wins

27,397dust2
8,331inferno
1,404cbble
1,211train
1,050vertigo
1,048nuke
391lake
183militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
87.5%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
613msReaction time
23.2%T opening success
53.7%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
9.49HE damage / grenade
7.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.1849% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–7-0.0120%30 Aug
cache5–13-0.0418%27 Aug
dust211–13-0.0811%19 Aug
dust213–40.0821%19 Aug
dust213–80.0217%17 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0113%16 Aug
ancient9–130.0118%11 Aug
ancient3–13-0.1020%11 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0812%10 Aug
cache13–80.0128%10 Aug
dust213–70.1329%8 Aug
nuke16–130.0218%8 Aug
dust216–140.0628%8 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0021%8 Aug
dust213–80.0025%7 Aug
cache5–130.0114%7 Aug
dust213–3-0.0320%7 Aug
inferno10–130.0420%6 Aug
mirage13–50.0227%6 Aug
ancient13–70.0922%6 Aug
anubis13–110.0223%6 Aug
nuke8–130.0126%6 Aug
dust213–110.0529%6 Aug
ancient13–70.1725%6 Aug
nuke13–100.0317%5 Aug
inferno13–70.0628%5 Aug
cache13–100.0319%4 Aug
inferno10–13-0.1015%4 Aug
nuke7–130.0110%4 Aug
mirage13–80.0168%3 Aug
nuke13–160.0435%3 Aug
dust213–30.1038%3 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0121%3 Aug
cache13–90.0623%3 Aug
dust211–13-0.0223%3 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0012%3 Aug
dust213–100.0521%3 Aug
anubis13–70.1023%2 Aug
inferno13–70.0633%2 Aug
ancient8–130.0325%2 Aug
nuke10–130.0220%2 Aug
dust25–13-0.0620%2 Aug
nuke13–80.0923%2 Aug
ancient13–100.0429%2 Aug
nuke13–60.0713%2 Aug
nuke5–110.0124%2 Aug
ancient13–80.009%2 Aug
inferno13–10.0826%1 Aug
dust213–4-0.0128%1 Aug
mirage16–130.0720%1 Aug
dust29–130.0430%1 Aug
inferno13–90.1238%1 Aug
dust213–00.138%1 Aug
inferno13–80.1028%31 Jul
nuke13–110.0033%31 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0320%30 Jul
anubis13–70.0521%28 Jul
dust213–60.0847%27 Jul
dust212–160.1320%27 Jul
cache13–4-0.0220%27 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0029%27 Jul
mirage13–70.0822%26 Jul
dust213–100.0221%26 Jul
ancient13–90.1123%26 Jul
dust216–140.0328%26 Jul
inferno13–60.0932%26 Jul
ancient13–10.1020%26 Jul
nuke13–50.1525%26 Jul
ancient13–30.0830%25 Jul
inferno13–40.1921%25 Jul
nuke13–10.1039%25 Jul
inferno13–60.1127%25 Jul
ancient13–60.0934%25 Jul
dust213–20.1628%25 Jul
dust213–100.1517%25 Jul
dust27–13-0.0428%24 Jul
dust27–13-0.0114%24 Jul
dust213–70.0617%24 Jul
inferno13–40.0915%24 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0213%24 Jul
dust213–10.0343%24 Jul
mirage13–90.0614%24 Jul
nuke13–70.0316%24 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0719%24 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0111%23 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0217%23 Jul
dust29–13-0.037%23 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0416%22 Jul
dust210–130.049%22 Jul
dust29–130.0420%22 Jul
inferno13–90.1310%22 Jul
inferno9–50.0413%22 Jul
dust210–13-0.0317%22 Jul
inferno13–90.078%22 Jul
dust213–90.0514%20 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0517%16 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0214%16 Jul
ancient13–80.1413%16 Jul
dust214–160.0612%16 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0510%15 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches14-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →