Lickmaw

Lickmaw — CS2 Stats

76561198102013937[U:1:141748209]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,413Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.2 Developing
CSDB Leaderboard#56686 of 56732 tracked
FaceitLevel 2 · 584 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

584Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 584
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 167 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLickmawFACEITLevel 2 · 584 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPEAK ELO584csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning51
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY444214Last 10044%Win rateLWWLWWTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.6
Aggression7.1
Utility4.3
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 615ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning5.1
Utility4.3
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact7.4

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time620ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 667ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%−4.6%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — dust2 13–6
132Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 6nukeWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B40192148%-0.00
nukeD91811%-0.03
mirageC83538%-0.01
infernoS64267%0.00
officeB63350%-0.02
vertigoD51420%-0.04
poseidon32167%-0.02
cache32167%-0.01
agency330100%-0.02
train3030%-0.01
grail31233%0.00
anubis21150%0.04
palacio21150%-0.02
italy21150%-0.02
golden1010%0.04
rooftop1010%-0.03
transit110100%0.10
overpass1010%-0.07
ancient110100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

45Matches
38%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
71.7ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1436%0.9415.0
Dust2743%1.0617.1
Ancient667%1.0014.0
Nuke520%0.6010.8
Train20%0.8621.0
Inferno250%0.569.5
Anubis250%0.7310.5
Vertigo1100%1.5018.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
66.0%Counter-strafing
12.5°Preaim
615msReaction time
35.9%T opening success
54.2%CT opening success
0.76Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
8.72HE damage / grenade
2.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.5255° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.398 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–13-0.0317%11 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0314%6 Jul
inferno6–2-0.0343%5 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0230%20 Jun
dust213–70.0118%20 Jun
anubis13–40.0324%20 Jun
nuke12–120.0013%20 Jun
poseidon9–40.0617%19 Jun
poseidon6–9-0.0724%19 Jun
dust27–13-0.0613%19 Jun
poseidon9–7-0.0416%5 Jun
dust213–60.0415%5 Jun
dust212–120.0514%5 Jun
dust213–11-0.039%3 Jun
cache13–7-0.0411%17 May
cache13–60.0425%17 May
cache5–13-0.0414%29 Apr
mirage10–130.0028%4 Jan
dust25–13-0.0321%2 Jan
dust213–110.0217%7 Dec
nuke6–13-0.0326%5 Dec
dust211–130.0013%5 Dec
dust213–80.0214%4 Dec
office8–13-0.053%2 Dec
dust213–6-0.0312%1 Dec
dust25–13-0.0017%30 Nov
dust213–7-0.0122%30 Nov
dust28–13-0.0213%30 Nov
nuke11–13-0.0214%29 Nov
dust213–100.0520%26 Nov
dust213–50.0539%25 Nov
dust213–60.1221%25 Nov
office13–8-0.0322%24 Nov
office13–60.0725%23 Nov
dust29–13-0.0614%23 Nov
dust213–50.0029%10 Oct
dust29–10.0038%10 Oct
dust211–13-0.0121%9 Oct
palacio4–13-0.0415%3 Oct
office13–7-0.054%3 Oct
golden12–120.0427%3 Oct
palacio13–5-0.0017%2 Oct
rooftop5–9-0.0325%2 Oct
transit9–70.1017%2 Oct
nuke9–13-0.0114%16 Sept
dust210–13-0.0123%7 Sept
agency13–50.0119%7 Sept
vertigo8–13-0.058%7 Sept
dust29–13-0.0120%6 Sept
inferno12–12-0.074%3 Sept
italy9–13-0.075%3 Sept
dust213–40.0514%3 Sept
office11–130.0016%1 Sept
dust213–100.0421%1 Sept
nuke12–12-0.0419%1 Sept
office12–12-0.0420%30 Aug
anubis7–130.0520%30 Aug
overpass6–13-0.0720%30 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0417%28 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0528%27 Aug
train12–12-0.0421%27 Aug
agency13–5-0.0131%26 Aug
dust210–13-0.0520%25 Aug
ancient13–20.1146%24 Aug
dust26–13-0.0424%24 Aug
grail13–70.0826%24 Aug
dust213–100.0444%22 Aug
vertigo13–5-0.0525%14 Aug
dust212–120.0344%14 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0422%12 Aug
vertigo8–8-0.0829%12 Aug
inferno9–70.0023%12 Aug
dust27–13-0.0822%2 Aug
inferno13–90.0115%2 Aug
dust213–110.0443%2 Aug
inferno9–130.0318%30 Jul
dust26–13-0.0324%21 Jul
dust26–13-0.0539%19 Jul
dust22–13-0.0540%19 Jul
train10–13-0.0725%11 Jul
dust213–50.0228%10 Jul
dust213–80.0421%12 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0214%12 Jun
train12–120.0923%10 Jun
dust210–13-0.0416%10 Jun
mirage10–130.0323%7 Jun
inferno13–20.0714%7 Jun
vertigo5–130.0128%7 Jun
dust28–130.0426%6 Jun
grail8–13-0.0525%6 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0222%4 Jun
dust213–80.0012%3 Jun
dust212–12-0.0213%3 Jun
vertigo12–12-0.0313%3 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0419%3 Jun
dust212–12-0.0327%2 Jun
italy13–110.0311%2 Jun
agency13–11-0.0527%1 Jun
grail3–13-0.0220%29 May
mirage13–60.0521%26 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →