󠀡󠀡 󠀡󠀡 󠀡󠀡 󠀡

󠀡󠀡 󠀡󠀡 󠀡󠀡 󠀡 — CS2 Stats

76561198100121245[U:1:139855517]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

1,040Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,349Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8744 of 25438 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

21,349Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,349
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,651 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG󠀡󠀡 󠀡󠀡 󠀡󠀡 󠀡FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,349 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning43
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56431Last 10056%Win rateWLWWWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5
Aggression6.3
Utility5.1
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.3
Utility5.1
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time586ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy28.5%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 29.0% → last ⅓ avg 28.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — ancient 13–4
131Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
116In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 16nukeWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA26161062%-0.00
anubisC1881044%-0.01
ancientS1611569%0.02
infernoA149564%0.01
dust2C146843%-0.01
nukeC83538%-0.01
cache32167%0.02
overpass110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

547Matches
50%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
78.8ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage13855%1.1316.9
Dust29345%0.9815.6
Anubis6557%1.0516.9
Ancient6255%1.0916.5
Inferno5754%1.0216.2
Nuke2928%1.0416.3
Cache1753%1.0817.2
Overpass743%1.3019.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.0%Headshot accuracy
30.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
74.6%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
581msReaction time
35.0%T opening success
40.1%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
7.26HE damage / grenade
5.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.9964% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16–14-0.0233%23 Aug
inferno9–13-0.107%8 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0048%8 Aug
anubis19–17-0.0129%4 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0452%4 Aug
inferno1–5-0.0467%4 Aug
dust28–13-0.0565%3 Aug
inferno13–60.0450%3 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0442%3 Aug
inferno13–50.0517%2 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0727%2 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0332%2 Aug
mirage13–20.0129%2 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0614%30 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0841%27 Jul
nuke13–90.0326%26 Jul
dust213–10-0.0430%26 Jul
mirage13–80.0022%25 Jul
dust211–130.0024%25 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0415%25 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0023%24 Jul
inferno13–110.0141%24 Jul
ancient16–190.0232%24 Jul
anubis13–70.0120%24 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0415%23 Jul
cache13–16-0.0010%23 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0412%23 Jul
anubis13–90.0913%23 Jul
mirage8–130.0227%22 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0120%21 Jul
nuke13–160.0526%20 Jul
anubis13–70.0816%20 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0117%20 Jul
inferno16–120.0627%20 Jul
dust28–13-0.0913%20 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0314%20 Jul
cache13–40.0421%20 Jul
anubis13–60.0333%20 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0516%20 Jul
anubis6–130.0216%19 Jul
mirage13–100.0315%19 Jul
ancient13–40.2237%18 Jul
inferno13–5-0.037%18 Jul
anubis11–130.0227%17 Jul
inferno13–110.0234%17 Jul
mirage0–13-0.04100%17 Jul
mirage16–130.0738%17 Jul
mirage7–130.0618%17 Jul
mirage22–20-0.0322%16 Jul
dust216–140.0226%16 Jul
mirage11–130.0216%16 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0316%15 Jul
mirage13–80.0538%15 Jul
dust26–13-0.0545%14 Jul
inferno13–100.0230%14 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0335%14 Jul
ancient13–70.0435%14 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0725%14 Jul
dust213–40.0419%14 Jul
ancient8–130.0331%14 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0221%14 Jul
mirage13–50.0834%14 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0724%13 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0321%13 Jul
inferno13–80.0343%13 Jul
cache13–90.0230%13 Jul
dust213–70.0433%13 Jul
dust22–130.0853%13 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0135%13 Jul
inferno13–90.0239%13 Jul
inferno15–150.0535%11 Jul
dust213–100.0328%11 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0314%9 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0428%5 Jul
ancient13–100.0322%5 Jul
mirage25–23-0.0134%4 Jul
mirage13–110.0827%4 Jul
dust29–13-0.0528%4 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0434%4 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0530%29 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0623%29 Jun
anubis12–16-0.0428%28 Jun
ancient16–120.0315%25 Jun
ancient19–150.0028%25 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0218%21 Jun
ancient13–60.0531%21 Jun
overpass13–50.0545%21 Jun
inferno11–130.0333%21 Jun
anubis7–13-0.1225%21 Jun
nuke10–130.0030%21 Jun
dust213–20.0328%8 Jun
mirage8–130.0138%8 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0922%7 Jun
ancient16–130.0828%7 Jun
anubis13–20.0526%6 Jun
dust26–13-0.0730%6 Jun
dust28–13-0.0414%4 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0327%4 Jun
nuke13–10.0136%4 Jun
ancient13–40.0928%4 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →