skeet — CS2 Stats

US76561198094515600[U:1:134249872]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

929Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,477Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.4 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating23,879Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#5032 of 25439 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSilver Elite Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	46.7%	44.2%	44.9%	above
Shot accuracy	16.4%	11.2%	11.8%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.01	1.04	1.04	0.03 short
Match win rate	43.0%	45.3%	45.3%	2.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning61

Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateWWLLLWWLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8

Aggression8.8

Utility5.4

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels3.8

Clutch10.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning6.1

Utility5.4

Mechanics9.1

Opening Duels3.8

Win Impact8.6

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time587ms−35ms

first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms

Headshot accuracy22.5%+3.2%

first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — anubis 13–11

13–1Biggest win — nuke

5Longest win streak

W2Current streak

9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11infernoWeakest map · 33% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	23	13–10	57%	0.00
mirage	A	18	11–7	61%	0.02
nuke	B	13	7–6	54%	0.00
inferno	D	12	4–8	33%	-0.00
cache	C	12	5–7	42%	0.01
ancient	A	11	7–4	64%	-0.02
anubis	B	10	5–5	50%	0.03
office	—	1	0–1	0%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

108,149Lifetime kills

1.01K/D

3,801Matches

43.0%Match win rate

46.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players

16.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players

8,541MVPs

1,890Hours (in match)

4,655Bombs planted

925Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,540

AWP24,265

M4A4 / M4A1-S15,634

P2000 / USP-S4,947

Desert Eagle4,494

SSG 084,289

P2503,306

Glock-182,917

FAMAS2,552

Tec-91,497

Lifetime map wins

9,435dust2

4,192inferno

3,448nuke

1,333train

861vertigo

661cbble

575office

87italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

28Matches

57%Win rate

1.35Avg K/D

90.0ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

75%1v1 clutch win

50%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	8	50%	1.22	17.4
Anubis	7	86%	1.12	13.7
Mirage	5	80%	1.42	21.6
Inferno	4	25%	1.86	24.3
Ancient	2	50%	1.93	20.0
Vertigo	2	0%	0.85	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy

39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.7%Spray accuracy

91.1%Counter-strafing

8.7°Preaim

576msReaction time

37.2%T opening success

53.2%CT opening success

0.58Enemies flashed / flash

6.1%Flash assists

10.92HE damage / grenade

8.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.1636% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–11	-0.00	16%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.04	27%	29 Aug →
anubis	5–13	0.01	21%	28 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.00	27%	28 Aug →
office	11–13	0.04	23%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.03	10%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.02	20%	25 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.03	38%	25 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.00	8%	23 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.00	21%	22 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.01	20%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	28%	21 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.03	16%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.04	32%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.01	15%	17 Aug →
inferno	5–13	0.02	36%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.05	14%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.08	26%	16 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.03	19%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	20%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.03	21%	15 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.03	29%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.00	40%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.10	25%	14 Aug →
cache	16–12	0.04	17%	13 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	27%	13 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.03	22%	7 Aug →
inferno	12–16	-0.01	43%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	8%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.01	26%	6 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.05	20%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	13%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	16%	4 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.04	20%	4 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	25%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.02	8%	4 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.06	10%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.07	24%	3 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.01	23%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.05	33%	3 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	12%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.07	36%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	20%	2 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.03	17%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.03	24%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	20%	1 Aug →
inferno	14–16	-0.06	8%	1 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.07	11%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.07	19%	31 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.02	10%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	15%	28 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	22%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	13%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.03	15%	27 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	14%	25 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.07	14%	25 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	27%	25 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	17%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.00	30%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.03	18%	25 Jul →
nuke	12–16	0.03	14%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.05	21%	24 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.02	28%	24 Jul →
cache	1–5	0.00	19%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	13%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.03	26%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.04	15%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	18%	24 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	16%	24 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.01	14%	23 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.01	10%	23 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.01	19%	23 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.03	11%	23 Jul →
nuke	6–11	0.00	18%	23 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.00	16%	22 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.01	16%	22 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.01	28%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.02	20%	22 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.06	27%	22 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.01	18%	21 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.03	30%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.16	26%	20 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.07	5%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.06	11%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	16%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.14	6%	18 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	32%	18 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	14%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.03	16%	18 Jul →
cache	14–16	0.02	22%	18 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	14%	17 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.08	48%	17 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	16%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.04	17%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.08	25%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	40%	15 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.03	22%	15 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.08	9%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.02	18%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	18%	14 Jul →