Mangthang

Mangthang — CS2 Stats

UM76561198094421852[U:1:134156124]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

329Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
332Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidClutch Specialist
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning36
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY573310Last 10057%Win rateLLWWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim7.7
Aggression1.4
Utility4.7
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch10.0

Reliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning3.6
Utility4.7
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.07
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time601ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms
Headshot accuracy14.8%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — train 13–5
130Biggest win — vertigo
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
91In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 86% over 7infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S1511473%0.03
ancientS1510567%0.03
mirageC114736%-0.03
overpassB115645%0.02
agencyD93633%0.08
vertigoA85363%0.06
nukeB84450%0.01
anubisS76186%0.03
infernoD72529%0.07
trainS65183%0.08
office32167%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

21,858Lifetime kills
1.30K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
1,079Matches
42.8%Match win rate
39.1%Headshot %
13.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
1,982MVPs
332Hours (in match)
576Bombs planted
230Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,810dust2
1,011nuke
985inferno
386vertigo
294train
112cbble
72office
22stmarc

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches
75%Win rate
1.62Avg K/D
73.4ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

75%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno10%0.8814.0
Ancient1100%3.0015.0
Vertigo1100%1.8917.0
Mirage1100%0.6911.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.1%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
601msReaction time
21.4%T opening success
25.6%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
8.60HE damage / grenade
6.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.1462% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.4284% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.0516%5 Mar
overpass7–13-0.1010%21 Feb
mirage13–100.0517%21 Feb
vertigo13–90.1116%17 Feb
vertigo13–60.0617%17 Feb
nuke16–14-0.019%8 Feb
anubis13–160.0011%8 Feb
dust26–13-0.0813%8 Feb
mirage2–13-0.0614%7 Feb
dust23–13-0.0818%7 Feb
anubis13–110.0820%7 Feb
anubis13–80.079%7 Feb
overpass8–13-0.0511%7 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0522%2 Feb
ancient13–6-0.0218%2 Feb
dust24–0-0.0144%2 Feb
nuke4–13-0.0618%2 Feb
ancient9–130.0913%1 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0710%1 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0116%31 Jan
ancient5–13-0.0711%31 Jan
mirage13–10-0.059%31 Jan
dust213–80.0418%31 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0620%30 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0212%30 Jan
overpass8–13-0.0721%29 Jan
overpass16–140.0013%28 Jan
anubis13–10-0.105%28 Jan
nuke13–16-0.0611%27 Jan
nuke13–80.0314%27 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0413%26 Jan
ancient13–50.045%25 Jan
dust213–80.0715%25 Jan
anubis13–80.0424%25 Jan
office13–30.0319%24 Jan
office13–70.0913%24 Jan
mirage7–13-0.067%15 Jan
overpass12–120.2117%15 Jan
overpass6–13-0.016%15 Jan
dust213–10-0.0311%13 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0211%11 Jan
inferno12–120.0513%10 Jan
vertigo13–5-0.019%10 Jan
overpass7–130.0610%10 Jan
ancient13–20.1317%8 Jan
ancient12–120.099%5 Jan
train13–80.0212%5 Jan
dust213–2-0.019%4 Jan
train13–20.0814%4 Jan
ancient12–120.0419%3 Jan
inferno12–120.1514%3 Jan
agency10–130.0811%3 Jan
overpass10–80.0822%3 Jan
office5–130.0812%2 Jan
agency12–120.0915%2 Jan
train13–110.0214%2 Jan
train13–10.1118%2 Jan
nuke5–130.0313%2 Jan
vertigo13–30.1312%31 Dec
dust213–30.1625%31 Dec
agency13–50.208%30 Dec
dust213–11-0.0214%30 Dec
nuke13–5-0.0217%29 Dec
agency9–13-0.0119%29 Dec
inferno12–120.0418%28 Dec
agency7–130.1314%28 Dec
agency13–110.1613%27 Dec
agency4–13-0.067%27 Dec
agency13–30.0732%27 Dec
ancient10–20.0424%27 Dec
dust28–13-0.0415%27 Dec
inferno16–130.0114%26 Dec
ancient13–60.0116%26 Dec
dust212–120.0210%26 Dec
ancient13–60.0312%24 Dec
dust213–20.1813%24 Dec
dust213–20.1524%23 Dec
ancient13–110.0113%22 Dec
agency12–120.0616%22 Dec
vertigo8–130.029%21 Dec
ancient13–6-0.0711%21 Dec
overpass13–11-0.0111%21 Dec
mirage6–130.0215%20 Dec
ancient13–60.0711%20 Dec
overpass13–60.0814%19 Dec
dust213–40.1129%19 Dec
inferno13–50.1619%19 Dec
dust213–2-0.0321%18 Dec
vertigo10–130.0214%18 Dec
vertigo13–00.1313%17 Dec
overpass13–80.0016%17 Dec
anubis13–20.034%17 Dec
vertigo1–90.0318%17 Dec
ancient13–70.1213%16 Dec
train10–130.0516%16 Dec
nuke13–90.0416%16 Dec
anubis13–30.0613%15 Dec
inferno12–120.1013%15 Dec
nuke11–130.1115%14 Dec
train13–50.2218%14 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →