Mangthang — CS2 Stats
UM76561198094421852[U:1:134156124]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion well above par.
Reliable in 1v1s
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity
Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.
Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-fight frequency.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | 15 | 11–4 | 73% | 0.03 | |
| S | 15 | 10–5 | 67% | 0.03 | |
| C | 11 | 4–7 | 36% | -0.03 | |
| B | 11 | 5–6 | 45% | 0.02 | |
| agency | D | 9 | 3–6 | 33% | 0.08 |
| A | 8 | 5–3 | 63% | 0.06 | |
| B | 8 | 4–4 | 50% | 0.01 | |
| S | 7 | 6–1 | 86% | 0.03 | |
| D | 7 | 2–5 | 29% | 0.07 | |
| S | 6 | 5–1 | 83% | 0.08 | |
| office | — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | 0.07 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inferno | 1 | 0% | 0.88 | 14.0 |
| Ancient | 1 | 100% | 3.00 | 15.0 |
| Vertigo | 1 | 100% | 1.89 | 17.0 |
| Mirage | 1 | 100% | 0.69 | 11.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Best CS2 CrosshairAim Training →
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.1462% — below the 15% mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 21.4284% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5–13 | -0.05 | 16% | 5 Mar → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.10 | 10% | 21 Feb → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.05 | 17% | 21 Feb → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.11 | 16% | 17 Feb → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.06 | 17% | 17 Feb → | ||
| 16–14 | -0.01 | 9% | 8 Feb → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.00 | 11% | 8 Feb → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.08 | 13% | 8 Feb → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.06 | 14% | 7 Feb → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.08 | 18% | 7 Feb → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.08 | 20% | 7 Feb → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.07 | 9% | 7 Feb → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.05 | 11% | 7 Feb → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.05 | 22% | 2 Feb → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.02 | 18% | 2 Feb → | ||
| 4–0 | -0.01 | 44% | 2 Feb → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.06 | 18% | 2 Feb → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.09 | 13% | 1 Feb → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.07 | 10% | 1 Feb → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.01 | 16% | 31 Jan → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.07 | 11% | 31 Jan → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.05 | 9% | 31 Jan → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 18% | 31 Jan → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.06 | 20% | 30 Jan → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.02 | 12% | 30 Jan → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.07 | 21% | 29 Jan → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.00 | 13% | 28 Jan → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.10 | 5% | 28 Jan → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.06 | 11% | 27 Jan → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.03 | 14% | 27 Jan → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.04 | 13% | 26 Jan → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.04 | 5% | 25 Jan → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.07 | 15% | 25 Jan → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 24% | 25 Jan → | ||
| office | 13–3 | 0.03 | 19% | 24 Jan → | |
| office | 13–7 | 0.09 | 13% | 24 Jan → | |
| 7–13 | -0.06 | 7% | 15 Jan → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.21 | 17% | 15 Jan → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.01 | 6% | 15 Jan → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.03 | 11% | 13 Jan → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 11% | 11 Jan → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.05 | 13% | 10 Jan → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.01 | 9% | 10 Jan → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.06 | 10% | 10 Jan → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.13 | 17% | 8 Jan → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.09 | 9% | 5 Jan → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 12% | 5 Jan → | ||
| 13–2 | -0.01 | 9% | 4 Jan → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.08 | 14% | 4 Jan → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.04 | 19% | 3 Jan → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.15 | 14% | 3 Jan → | ||
| agency | 10–13 | 0.08 | 11% | 3 Jan → | |
| 10–8 | 0.08 | 22% | 3 Jan → | ||
| office | 5–13 | 0.08 | 12% | 2 Jan → | |
| agency | 12–12 | 0.09 | 15% | 2 Jan → | |
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 14% | 2 Jan → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.11 | 18% | 2 Jan → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.03 | 13% | 2 Jan → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.13 | 12% | 31 Dec → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.16 | 25% | 31 Dec → | ||
| agency | 13–5 | 0.20 | 8% | 30 Dec → | |
| 13–11 | -0.02 | 14% | 30 Dec → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.02 | 17% | 29 Dec → | ||
| agency | 9–13 | -0.01 | 19% | 29 Dec → | |
| 12–12 | 0.04 | 18% | 28 Dec → | ||
| agency | 7–13 | 0.13 | 14% | 28 Dec → | |
| agency | 13–11 | 0.16 | 13% | 27 Dec → | |
| agency | 4–13 | -0.06 | 7% | 27 Dec → | |
| agency | 13–3 | 0.07 | 32% | 27 Dec → | |
| 10–2 | 0.04 | 24% | 27 Dec → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.04 | 15% | 27 Dec → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.01 | 14% | 26 Dec → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.01 | 16% | 26 Dec → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.02 | 10% | 26 Dec → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.03 | 12% | 24 Dec → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.18 | 13% | 24 Dec → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.15 | 24% | 23 Dec → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.01 | 13% | 22 Dec → | ||
| agency | 12–12 | 0.06 | 16% | 22 Dec → | |
| 8–13 | 0.02 | 9% | 21 Dec → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.07 | 11% | 21 Dec → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.01 | 11% | 21 Dec → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.02 | 15% | 20 Dec → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.07 | 11% | 20 Dec → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.08 | 14% | 19 Dec → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.11 | 29% | 19 Dec → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.16 | 19% | 19 Dec → | ||
| 13–2 | -0.03 | 21% | 18 Dec → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.02 | 14% | 18 Dec → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.13 | 13% | 17 Dec → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.00 | 16% | 17 Dec → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.03 | 4% | 17 Dec → | ||
| 1–9 | 0.03 | 18% | 17 Dec → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.12 | 13% | 16 Dec → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.05 | 16% | 16 Dec → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.04 | 16% | 16 Dec → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.06 | 13% | 15 Dec → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.10 | 13% | 15 Dec → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.11 | 15% | 14 Dec → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.22 | 18% | 14 Dec → |
Match data via Leetify.