BloodNoskie — CS2 Stats

76561198094201925[U:1:133936197]

705Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
921Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.1 Developing
Premier CS Rating18,266Purple band · top ~15.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9538 of 18018 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBloodNoskieFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,266 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning49
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53461Last 10053%Win rateLWLLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8
Aggression4.6
Utility6.9
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch0.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning4.9
Utility6.9
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time601ms+38ms
first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%−3.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — nuke 4–0
131Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
127In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA25141156%-0.00
mirageB1991047%-0.01
nukeB126650%-0.00
ancientA116555%-0.03
dust2S107370%-0.01
anubisC94544%0.01
trainA53260%-0.03
overpassS54180%0.01
vertigo1010%-0.02
jura1010%-0.06
cache1010%-0.07
office1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

38,924Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
1,963Matches
46.1%Match win rate
50.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
10.4%Shot accuracy
4,982MVPs
921Hours (in match)
1,589Bombs planted
438Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,139inferno
1,852dust2
1,022nuke
926train
782vertigo
122cbble
119aztec
116dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

490Matches
53%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
72.6ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

24%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1173%1.1218.4
Mirage978%1.0314.6
Ancient729%0.8714.4
Nuke540%0.7711.6
Anubis425%0.8515.3
Train450%0.9413.3
Overpass3100%0.9618.0
Cache30%1.0918.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
29.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
604msReaction time
25.0%T opening success
44.6%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
8.06HE damage / grenade
12.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.9861% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke14–16-0.0625%2 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0311%2 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.0225%2 Aug
jura7–13-0.0615%31 Jul
inferno13–10.0416%30 Jul
nuke9–13-0.079%26 Jul
train13–9-0.0628%26 Jul
cache6–13-0.0723%26 Jul
inferno0–13-0.058%24 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0710%23 Jul
dust28–13-0.0121%23 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0610%23 Jul
mirage5–3-0.0631%23 Jul
train10–13-0.0419%22 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0322%22 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0112%22 Jul
mirage14–160.0516%21 Jul
inferno13–1-0.0418%21 Jul
inferno12–120.0813%21 Jul
overpass13–60.0115%21 Jul
overpass13–7-0.0219%20 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0311%20 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0312%19 Jul
dust213–8-0.0712%19 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0210%19 Jul
overpass3–13-0.0131%19 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0713%19 Jul
overpass13–80.1235%18 Jul
dust213–11-0.0011%18 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0213%18 Jul
nuke16–13-0.028%17 Jul
inferno11–130.0114%16 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0324%16 Jul
dust213–20.0019%16 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0214%15 Jul
anubis13–60.0227%15 Jul
inferno13–90.0715%15 Jul
inferno13–20.0438%15 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0212%15 Jul
office5–130.0124%14 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0724%14 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0316%14 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0015%13 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0315%13 Jul
dust29–130.017%13 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0120%13 Jul
overpass13–11-0.0515%12 Jul
train9–13-0.0213%11 Jul
inferno13–60.0420%10 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0529%9 Jul
anubis6–130.0324%9 Jul
train13–5-0.0356%9 Jul
mirage13–40.048%9 Jul
mirage5–130.0016%8 Jul
nuke5–13-0.068%8 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0118%8 Jul
mirage13–100.1417%8 Jul
nuke13–40.0310%7 Jul
dust213–8-0.0416%7 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0219%6 Jul
ancient6–2-0.0813%6 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0619%6 Jul
dust213–11-0.0019%6 Jul
inferno7–130.009%6 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0326%6 Jul
dust213–70.0117%5 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0319%5 Jul
nuke9–10.0424%5 Jul
ancient13–50.0215%5 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0215%5 Jul
anubis14–160.0027%4 Jul
mirage2–2-0.060%4 Jul
inferno1–11-0.0232%3 Jul
nuke4–00.1840%3 Jul
dust25–13-0.0321%3 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0414%3 Jul
anubis13–80.1023%2 Jul
nuke13–80.0111%2 Jul
ancient13–80.0621%1 Jul
mirage14–160.0122%30 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0220%30 Jun
inferno1–130.0331%29 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0213%29 Jun
mirage13–100.0324%29 Jun
inferno16–130.048%28 Jun
inferno9–130.0427%27 Jun
nuke13–110.0421%26 Jun
dust213–70.0621%26 Jun
train13–50.0312%25 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0521%24 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0426%23 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0220%23 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0326%22 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0121%8 Nov
ancient8–13-0.0519%8 Nov
ancient13–6-0.0712%20 Jun
anubis14–16-0.0325%20 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0717%31 Mar
ancient13–160.0310%16 Oct
inferno13–110.0628%15 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →