M4Y

M4Y — CS2 Stats

US76561198091027105[U:1:130761377]Steam profile ↗

2,423Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,742Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.5 Developing
Premier CS Rating17,752Purple band · top ~17.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8875 of 15952 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,622 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGM4YFACEITLevel 8 · 1,622 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER17,752 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49
Positioning58
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45478Last 10045%Win rateLWWLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.9
Aggression5.9
Utility4.2
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch6.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9
Positioning5.8
Utility4.2
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time587ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 619ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 8–13
131Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
19Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 12cacheWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC38162242%0.01
infernoS129375%-0.00
ancientB126650%-0.01
anubisC114736%0.00
dust2B105550%-0.03
cacheD92722%-0.02
nukeA53260%-0.03
train1010%-0.02
eldorado1010%-0.03
debris1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

280,894Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
15,820Matches
36.3%Match win rate
39.1%Headshot %
16.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
41,988MVPs
6,742Hours (in match)
8,865Bombs planted
3,112Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4799,372
AWP15,731
P2508,111
Knife6,228
FAMAS5,115

Lifetime map wins

17,458inferno
10,371dust2
4,856train
3,612nuke
2,333cbble
1,455vertigo
961office
272lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

874Matches
51%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
71.9ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

53%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2868%1.0613.6
Dust21656%1.0912.4
Ancient1155%0.8413.3
Anubis1155%0.9515.6
Inferno1030%0.8112.8
Nuke1050%0.9515.0
Vertigo633%0.7915.5
Overpass10%0.6813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.0%Spray accuracy
74.1%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
582msReaction time
30.8%T opening success
46.7%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
9.19HE damage / grenade
4.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.405 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.8012% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–13-0.0429%20 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0317%20 Aug
mirage13–90.0219%20 Aug
mirage11–130.0518%19 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0321%19 Aug
mirage10–130.0915%19 Aug
inferno16–140.0026%19 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0316%19 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0118%19 Aug
mirage13–80.0515%19 Aug
mirage15–150.029%12 Aug
mirage11–130.0317%12 Aug
cache13–16-0.0025%12 Aug
mirage4–13-0.049%12 Aug
inferno16–140.0218%12 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0720%12 Aug
nuke13–90.039%10 Aug
cache9–13-0.019%10 Aug
mirage13–100.068%10 Aug
ancient13–80.0217%10 Aug
mirage9–130.0012%10 Aug
ancient5–13-0.086%8 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0822%8 Aug
mirage11–130.007%8 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0714%2 Aug
dust26–13-0.0713%2 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0114%2 Aug
nuke16–14-0.108%2 Aug
dust213–10-0.0418%2 Aug
cache11–13-0.0412%2 Aug
dust213–110.0111%2 Aug
mirage15–150.0113%2 Aug
ancient12–16-0.008%1 Aug
ancient13–100.016%1 Aug
inferno13–40.0124%1 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0213%1 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0310%1 Aug
ancient13–80.0213%29 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0819%29 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0315%29 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0416%29 Jul
anubis15–15-0.008%27 Jul
cache13–6-0.0010%27 Jul
mirage13–80.0330%27 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0020%27 Jul
mirage7–130.0710%26 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0212%26 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0418%26 Jul
mirage13–50.0410%26 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0113%25 Jul
inferno9–130.0325%25 Jul
anubis6–130.0310%25 Jul
mirage13–60.0512%25 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0314%25 Jul
anubis7–13-0.049%24 Jul
ancient13–60.0117%24 Jul
mirage13–40.0511%24 Jul
mirage13–90.099%24 Jul
anubis6–130.0116%24 Jul
anubis13–40.0520%23 Jul
anubis13–160.0125%23 Jul
cache4–13-0.0528%22 Jul
mirage9–130.0224%22 Jul
mirage15–150.0110%22 Jul
dust216–13-0.0216%20 Jul
dust27–13-0.0725%20 Jul
dust213–10-0.0215%20 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0113%20 Jul
mirage13–60.0517%20 Jul
mirage1–13-0.068%19 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0612%19 Jul
inferno13–100.0413%19 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0312%19 Jul
mirage13–70.0520%19 Jul
ancient15–150.0214%19 Jul
cache15–15-0.019%19 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0220%19 Jul
dust24–130.0312%18 Jul
mirage16–13-0.047%18 Jul
train12–12-0.0210%15 Jul
eldorado8–8-0.0318%15 Jul
debris6–9-0.0418%15 Jul
mirage8–130.1212%14 Jul
mirage10–130.0114%14 Jul
dust213–6-0.0720%14 Jul
mirage10–13-0.069%14 Jul
anubis13–80.0616%14 Jul
mirage13–100.0113%14 Jul
cache10–130.0113%14 Jul
dust22–13-0.0815%14 Jul
dust212–160.0312%14 Jul
mirage7–13-0.069%9 Jul
inferno13–10.067%9 Jul
cache11–13-0.0226%9 Jul
ancient13–50.0811%9 Jul
cache13–8-0.0517%8 Jul
anubis10–130.0716%6 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0322%6 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0312%6 Jul
inferno13–100.0118%6 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →