Feldqualle — CS2 Stats

76561198087349460[U:1:127083732]Steam profile ↗

1,091Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,227Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,549Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#16417 of 55375 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=6,418), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Pink band median	Red band median	vs Red band
Headshot rate	36.5%	47.1%	50.0%	13.6% short
Shot accuracy	16.6%	12.8%	13.5%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.33	1.08	1.13	above
Match win rate	51.6%	46.6%	48.4%	above

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning37

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–43–9Last 10048%Win rateWWLWLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3

Aggression4.9

Utility5.1

Positioning3.7

Opening Duels1.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 45 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning3.7

Utility5.1

Mechanics7.7

Opening Duels1.1

Win Impact1.4

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.05

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time562ms−73ms

first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms

Headshot accuracy14.5%+0.8%

first ⅓ avg 13.7% → last ⅓ avg 14.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–6

13–0Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

W2Current streak

6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 14dust2Weakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	A	22	12–10	55%	0.01
mirage	C	20	7–13	35%	0.02
ancient	A	16	10–6	63%	0.01
inferno	A	14	9–5	64%	0.02
nuke	B	8	4–4	50%	0.00
dust2	D	7	2–5	29%	0.01
anubis	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.01
office	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.02
overpass	—	2	0–2	0%	0.01
italy	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.09
alpine	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

100,996Lifetime kills

1.33K/D · Top 25% of Pink band

4,675Matches

51.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Pink band

36.5%Headshot %

16.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Pink band

11,802MVPs

1,763Hours (in match)

3,792Bombs planted

1,169Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4726,448

M4A4 / M4A1-S20,559

AWP11,485

P2000 / USP-S5,307

Desert Eagle4,855

Glock-183,389

SSG 082,870

MP92,676

P902,512

Five-SeveN2,138

Lifetime map wins

6,434dust2

4,109inferno

2,203nuke

1,894cbble

996office

784train

644vertigo

502italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

153Matches

53%Win rate

1.36Avg K/D

—ADR

34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.7%Headshot accuracy

38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.1%Spray accuracy

84.7%Counter-strafing

8.5°Preaim

550msReaction time

29.9%T opening success

39.2%CT opening success

0.52Enemies flashed / flash

7.7%Flash assists

10.72HE damage / grenade

5.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.6725% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.8875% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	16–12	0.03	16%	30 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.03	15%	30 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.01	16%	30 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.02	19%	29 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.07	11%	29 Aug →
office	13–11	-0.01	11%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.11	23%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.06	13%	24 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	10%	24 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.00	8%	23 Aug →
italy	12–12	-0.02	15%	23 Aug →
office	4–13	-0.03	17%	23 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.10	18%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–4	-0.11	9%	21 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.05	11%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.04	18%	19 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.01	23%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.03	7%	17 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	17%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.02	13%	16 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.00	11%	16 Aug →
nuke	3–9	-0.06	23%	16 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	10%	16 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.08	12%	16 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	22%	16 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.00	11%	16 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.10	6%	16 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.03	18%	14 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	0.09	11%	11 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.03	12%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.03	13%	11 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.03	26%	9 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.01	14%	9 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.07	19%	9 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.05	10%	18 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.08	13%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	20%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.02	19%	18 Jul →
dust2	2–13	0.01	14%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	26%	18 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.04	23%	18 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.04	16%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.02	12%	17 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.02	19%	17 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.06	7%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.03	15%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.01	14%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.06	14%	13 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	21%	13 Jul →
anubis	12–16	0.01	16%	28 Jun →
ancient	16–13	0.01	11%	17 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.02	10%	15 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.10	18%	5 Jun →
anubis	13–6	-0.02	10%	25 May →
inferno	13–9	0.00	14%	25 May →
anubis	13–5	-0.02	6%	21 May →
ancient	16–13	0.02	14%	19 May →
cache	13–6	-0.01	13%	16 May →
dust2	13–6	0.04	10%	16 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	20%	16 May →
ancient	11–13	0.02	9%	16 May →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	12%	15 May →
cache	13–10	0.01	11%	15 May →
mirage	6–13	0.08	37%	15 May →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	16%	13 May →
cache	13–9	0.05	6%	13 May →
dust2	12–12	0.07	17%	13 May →
mirage	13–0	0.10	16%	10 May →
cache	12–12	0.00	7%	10 May →
mirage	10–13	0.07	24%	6 May →
cache	13–5	0.00	18%	6 May →
overpass	1–7	-0.03	9%	6 May →
cache	13–8	0.04	11%	6 May →
mirage	13–6	0.16	13%	4 May →
cache	5–13	0.04	28%	2 May →
ancient	11–0	0.13	13%	2 May →
ancient	7–13	0.04	22%	2 May →
cache	13–8	-0.04	17%	1 May →
cache	13–1	0.10	15%	1 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.08	18%	1 May →
dust2	13–16	0.00	14%	1 May →
cache	13–8	0.05	14%	1 May →
cache	13–5	0.08	15%	29 Apr →
cache	11–13	0.04	17%	29 Apr →
cache	3–13	0.08	7%	29 Apr →
cache	13–9	0.05	16%	29 Apr →
inferno	13–9	0.03	8%	27 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.06	14%	27 Apr →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	13%	26 Apr →
mirage	13–4	-0.00	17%	26 Apr →
ancient	13–4	0.11	11%	26 Apr →
inferno	13–11	0.06	15%	25 Apr →
alpine	11–13	0.03	11%	25 Apr →
inferno	12–12	0.03	2%	25 Apr →
nuke	9–13	0.04	13%	24 Apr →
dust2	13–11	0.02	14%	24 Apr →
inferno	12–16	0.01	14%	24 Apr →
mirage	9–0	-0.01	9%	24 Apr →
anubis	8–13	0.06	7%	24 Apr →
overpass	12–12	0.04	10%	23 Apr →