JoeNunemaker

JoeNunemaker — CS2 Stats

US76561198083798026[U:1:123532298]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

861Tracked matches41%Win rate2026Tracked since
1,474Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,677Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9552 of 25074 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=862), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate42.9%44.9%46.2%3.3% short
Shot accuracy14.7%11.8%12.5%above
Kill/death ratio1.111.041.06above
Match win rate42.7%45.3%45.9%3.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJoeNunemakerFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER20,677 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning54
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51454Last 10051%Win rateLWLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6
Aggression7.8
Utility6.2
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.4
Utility6.2
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time546ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — anubis 7–13
131Biggest win — ancient
7Longest win streak
1110In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 22dust2Weakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB23111248%0.06
ancientA2214864%0.06
mirageB20101050%0.01
dust2C114736%-0.00
nukeC83538%0.01
infernoA85363%0.00
cacheA53260%0.01
vertigo31233%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

68,501Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
2,898Matches
42.7%Match win rate
42.9%Headshot %
14.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 6 players
6,135MVPs
1,474Hours (in match)
3,972Bombs planted
827Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,620dust2
3,637inferno
1,660nuke
1,307cbble
1,235train
186vertigo
111lake
59bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

510Matches
51%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
78.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14752%1.1116.4
Dust29047%1.0215.4
Ancient8147%1.0915.7
Anubis4947%1.1815.8
Cache4955%1.4716.7
Nuke3757%1.0716.2
Inferno3746%0.9013.4
Overpass580%1.0916.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.5%Spray accuracy
85.3%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
544msReaction time
41.2%T opening success
47.4%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
8.99HE damage / grenade
8.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage14–160.0213%29 Aug
cache13–110.0825%28 Aug
nuke13–160.0112%28 Aug
mirage3–130.0123%28 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0311%27 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0616%27 Aug
dust28–130.0423%26 Aug
anubis7–130.2218%25 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0414%25 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0224%24 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0020%24 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0013%24 Aug
anubis10–130.0718%24 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0418%23 Aug
dust213–30.0527%23 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0213%23 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0013%23 Aug
ancient13–50.1914%23 Aug
anubis13–80.1118%23 Aug
ancient13–90.0020%22 Aug
anubis6–130.0812%21 Aug
ancient4–130.0616%21 Aug
vertigo13–50.0511%20 Aug
mirage6–130.0013%20 Aug
anubis13–110.0914%19 Aug
ancient12–120.1113%19 Aug
ancient13–50.0414%19 Aug
ancient13–50.059%18 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0013%18 Aug
dust211–13-0.0127%17 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0516%16 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0121%16 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0310%15 Aug
inferno13–100.049%15 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0213%15 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0424%14 Aug
ancient13–90.0013%14 Aug
dust213–7-0.0129%13 Aug
dust217–19-0.0514%12 Aug
dust216–13-0.0216%12 Aug
mirage13–70.0714%11 Aug
ancient13–110.1815%11 Aug
mirage13–30.0911%11 Aug
mirage12–110.0010%10 Aug
nuke13–50.1127%10 Aug
anubis13–80.0620%10 Aug
inferno8–80.0523%9 Aug
mirage13–11-0.068%9 Aug
anubis8–130.0615%9 Aug
mirage13–90.0619%9 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0216%9 Aug
anubis12–120.0223%9 Aug
mirage16–130.0128%9 Aug
vertigo14–16-0.019%8 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0415%8 Aug
nuke4–130.0134%8 Aug
inferno13–20.0420%8 Aug
ancient12–120.1013%8 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0514%8 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0319%8 Aug
ancient13–110.1727%7 Aug
mirage8–130.0729%7 Aug
anubis13–30.1920%7 Aug
ancient13–50.1322%7 Aug
anubis13–30.0813%6 Aug
ancient13–30.2020%6 Aug
mirage13–50.1222%5 Aug
anubis11–130.0517%5 Aug
inferno6–130.0120%4 Aug
dust25–13-0.0526%4 Aug
ancient13–10.1322%4 Aug
dust28–130.0127%4 Aug
anubis13–40.2023%4 Aug
dust213–80.0421%4 Aug
mirage13–90.1019%4 Aug
ancient9–130.0315%4 Aug
anubis11–130.0511%4 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0413%4 Aug
cache13–10-0.0025%3 Aug
nuke5–13-0.026%3 Aug
dust210–130.0716%3 Aug
ancient5–130.0335%3 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0415%2 Aug
mirage13–110.0132%2 Aug
ancient16–140.0326%2 Aug
nuke9–130.0121%2 Aug
inferno9–4-0.0725%2 Aug
cache13–16-0.067%2 Aug
cache7–130.0323%2 Aug
dust24–13-0.0920%2 Aug
anubis13–110.0219%2 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0313%2 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0129%2 Aug
ancient5–13-0.018%2 Aug
anubis11–130.0318%1 Aug
inferno13–40.0220%1 Aug
anubis13–50.1428%1 Aug
vertigo10–130.0513%1 Aug
cache13–70.0241%1 Aug
ancient13–60.0615%1 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →