Beef Baron — CS2 Stats

76561198079919520[U:1:119653792]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,459Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating14,888Blue band · top ~29% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#11109 of 17022 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning52

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY35–57–8Last 10035%Win rateWLWLLLTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3

Aggression6.3

Utility5.7

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning5.2

Utility5.7

Mechanics8.0

Opening Duels2.0

Win Impact3.7

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time609ms−60ms

first ⅓ avg 670ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms

Headshot accuracy21.6%+0.9%

first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — inferno 13–2

13–1Biggest win — office

4Longest win streak

7–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 50% over 10mirageWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	D	32	10–22	31%	0.02
inferno	C	16	7–9	44%	0.04
cache	C	13	5–8	38%	0.02
ancient	D	12	4–8	33%	-0.01
office	B	10	5–5	50%	0.04
mirage	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.01
vertigo	D	5	1–4	20%	0.02
nuke	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01
anubis	—	3	1–2	33%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

38Matches

53%Win rate

1.09Avg K/D

—ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Vertigo	15	60%	1.26	18.4
Inferno	14	50%	0.94	13.4
Ancient	3	100%	1.23	20.0
Anubis	3	0%	1.20	18.0
Overpass	1	0%	0.12	2.0
Mirage	1	100%	0.76	16.0
Nuke	1	0%	1.27	28.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy

38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.7%Spray accuracy

86.0%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

606msReaction time

44.0%T opening success

32.3%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

9.4%Flash assists

10.20HE damage / grenade

11.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4768 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 32.3409% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–10	0.00	16%	27 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.01	21%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.00	14%	27 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	18%	24 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.12	29%	24 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	17%	23 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.02	16%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.07	23%	22 Aug →
office	7–13	0.01	28%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.11	38%	22 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	-0.02	22%	22 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.02	17%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.02	24%	17 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.00	11%	17 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.06	23%	16 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	0.00	18%	16 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.00	23%	16 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.04	22%	16 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.02	24%	16 Aug →
office	13–4	0.10	22%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.05	13%	15 Aug →
office	13–7	0.06	18%	13 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.01	23%	13 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.01	32%	13 Aug →
office	5–13	-0.01	41%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.07	18%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.00	22%	11 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.03	17%	10 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.02	18%	10 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	0.06	26%	8 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.03	19%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.03	16%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.11	24%	31 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.02	35%	31 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.08	24%	29 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	22%	27 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.09	14%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.07	14%	25 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.02	29%	25 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.02	30%	25 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.07	24%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.02	19%	21 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.02	14%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.05	27%	21 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.00	15%	21 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.03	15%	19 Jul →
ancient	12–12	0.02	25%	17 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.07	23%	16 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.02	17%	16 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	26%	15 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.02	19%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.03	25%	14 Jul →
office	13–1	0.01	21%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.08	21%	13 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.01	31%	13 Jul →
office	9–13	0.02	12%	12 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.02	13%	12 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.09	4%	9 Jul →
dust2	12–16	-0.01	18%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.04	17%	6 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.02	28%	4 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	19%	4 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	19%	3 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.09	17%	3 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.00	20%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.04	16%	3 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.18	18%	3 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.01	14%	2 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	22%	1 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	30%	1 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.03	14%	30 Jun →
dust2	7–13	0.03	25%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.03	28%	30 Jun →
inferno	8–13	0.08	21%	28 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.10	18%	28 Jun →
dust2	12–12	0.01	19%	28 Jun →
ancient	4–13	0.01	13%	27 Jun →
dust2	4–13	0.01	22%	26 Jun →
inferno	2–13	-0.01	21%	26 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	17%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–2	0.11	18%	23 Jun →
anubis	10–13	0.01	21%	23 Jun →
ancient	9–13	0.07	20%	21 Jun →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	16%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.01	15%	21 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	27%	20 Jun →
office	13–11	0.05	10%	20 Jun →
office	5–13	0.02	35%	20 Jun →
office	8–13	0.05	38%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.06	8%	19 Jun →
inferno	8–13	0.06	15%	19 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.04	13%	19 Jun →
office	13–11	0.05	20%	18 Jun →
cache	2–13	0.04	29%	18 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.14	28%	15 Jun →
vertigo	7–13	0.07	18%	14 Jun →
ancient	4–13	-0.08	21%	13 Jun →
cache	13–11	0.00	23%	9 Jun →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	22%	9 Jun →
vertigo	9–13	-0.03	22%	8 Jun →