JARVID 9: GECKO

JARVID 9: GECKO — CS2 Stats

76561198079784884[U:1:119519156]Steam profile ↗

878Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,706Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJARVID 9: GECKOFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning42
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY474310Last 10047%Win rateWWWWLTTLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8
Aggression3.9
Utility5.8
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.2
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time617ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy26.0%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 26.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — dust2 13–6
131Biggest win — overpass
4Longest win streak
W4Current streak
167In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
18Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 100% over 5dust2Weakest map · 32% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB23111248%-0.00
dust2D2271532%-0.01
cacheC156940%-0.01
nukeA127558%0.00
overpassC114736%-0.00
infernoB63350%-0.05
anubisS550100%-0.02
train43175%0.02
poseidon1010%-0.04
office110100%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

162,278Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
5,962Matches
41.9%Match win rate
55.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
18.4%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of tracked players
12,820MVPs
3,706Hours (in match)
4,580Bombs planted
1,932Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4771,569
AWP13,782
P2503,111
UMP-452,429
P902,023

Lifetime map wins

10,384dust2
2,746inferno
1,822nuke
1,309train
835cbble
636vertigo
183office
101lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

355Matches
52%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
65.5ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20%0.9016.5
Nuke20%0.9716.0
Anubis10%0.6213.0
Inferno10%0.428.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.3%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.3%Spray accuracy
84.5%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
607msReaction time
29.0%T opening success
35.8%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
6.25HE damage / grenade
20.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.0292% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–14-0.0223%12 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0135%11 Aug
cache13–60.0531%8 Aug
nuke9–70.0826%7 Aug
cache9–130.0133%6 Aug
poseidon8–8-0.0428%4 Aug
nuke8–8-0.0519%4 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0311%20 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0935%18 Jul
cache5–13-0.0430%18 Jul
cache13–8-0.0229%10 Jul
cache13–11-0.0128%3 Jul
cache8–130.0325%30 Jun
anubis16–14-0.0424%19 Jun
mirage6–130.0416%13 Jun
dust213–60.0719%13 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0315%13 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0223%7 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0220%7 Jun
overpass9–13-0.063%6 Jun
dust23–13-0.0919%6 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0033%6 Jun
dust24–13-0.0636%6 Jun
overpass13–10.0335%6 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0313%6 Jun
cache12–12-0.0314%5 Jun
dust28–13-0.0028%2 Jun
cache13–50.0555%2 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0232%1 Jun
cache5–13-0.0839%31 May
cache2–13-0.0338%31 May
mirage13–8-0.0421%31 May
dust213–11-0.0322%31 May
mirage14–16-0.0228%31 May
anubis13–11-0.0123%31 May
dust211–130.0123%27 May
mirage8–13-0.0217%27 May
dust216–14-0.0116%27 May
mirage13–110.0513%26 May
cache10–13-0.0227%26 May
nuke13–8-0.0230%24 May
cache13–10-0.0321%24 May
overpass8–13-0.0126%24 May
cache12–12-0.0018%5 May
cache13–50.0747%1 May
cache4–13-0.0527%1 May
mirage13–11-0.0634%26 Apr
overpass9–70.0321%25 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0121%19 Apr
overpass14–16-0.0119%4 Apr
mirage16–120.0410%26 Jan
dust22–13-0.0524%25 Jan
dust213–60.0925%25 Jan
dust215–15-0.0314%25 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0411%19 Jan
dust215–15-0.0211%3 Jan
mirage9–130.0032%3 Jan
nuke13–110.0428%3 Jan
office13–5-0.0728%1 Jan
nuke9–130.0631%30 Dec
dust213–50.0127%30 Dec
dust29–130.0246%30 Dec
inferno7–9-0.1032%30 Dec
nuke9–40.0438%29 Dec
inferno8–8-0.0717%29 Dec
dust213–70.0119%29 Dec
inferno9–7-0.0710%29 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0727%28 Dec
dust24–13-0.0711%28 Dec
dust211–130.0124%6 Dec
dust27–13-0.1126%6 Dec
inferno9–1-0.0323%6 Dec
nuke2–13-0.087%22 Oct
mirage13–6-0.0413%10 Sept
mirage14–160.0421%10 Sept
train9–13-0.0122%8 Sept
mirage13–90.0720%8 Sept
overpass13–10.0326%8 Sept
dust26–13-0.0540%8 Sept
dust216–14-0.0220%5 Sept
overpass6–130.0034%26 Aug
dust215–150.0425%26 Aug
train13–5-0.0617%26 Aug
overpass13–5-0.0324%26 Aug
overpass13–16-0.0017%16 Aug
mirage5–130.0129%16 Aug
overpass15–150.0317%16 Aug
mirage16–140.0025%16 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0115%16 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0321%12 Aug
mirage13–160.0534%12 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0416%12 Aug
train13–90.0724%12 Aug
train16–140.0817%9 Aug
dust211–130.0232%9 Aug
nuke13–40.0619%8 Aug
mirage13–100.0536%8 Aug
mirage13–80.0235%7 Aug
dust25–130.0732%7 Aug
inferno13–80.0114%7 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →