zepher

zepher — CS2 Stats

CA76561198078387389[U:1:118121661]Steam profile ↗

1,489Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,614Hours in CS31Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,730Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1897 of 16210 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzepherFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER25,730 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning45
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54433Last 10054%Win rateLWTWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1
Aggression3.4
Utility6.4
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.5
Utility6.4
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time495ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 526ms → last ⅓ avg 495ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — ancient 6–0
130Biggest win — cache
8Longest win streak
148In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 15infernoWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B36171947%0.00
anubisB168850%0.03
mirageA1610663%0.02
ancientS1510567%0.04
infernoC83538%0.03
cache440100%0.05
nuke42250%0.00
vertigo1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

76,921Lifetime kills
1.04K/D
4,050Matches
40.1%Match win rate
37.0%Headshot %
11.0%Shot accuracy
7,373MVPs
1,854Hours (in match)
2,901Bombs planted
1,148Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,022
AWP15,113
P2502,272
SSG 082,084
MP71,229

Lifetime map wins

12,592dust2
2,962inferno
1,515nuke
1,015vertigo
562train
101cbble
65assault
49office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

166Matches
57%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
83.1ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3450%1.5317.0
Dust23161%1.2117.0
Anubis2467%1.2117.0
Ancient2162%1.2019.1
Inferno1958%1.4317.3
Nuke1040%0.8415.8
Vertigo757%1.6214.4
Cache667%1.2414.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
492msReaction time
27.7%T opening success
30.6%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
12.4%Flash assists
9.95HE damage / grenade
9.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.6646% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–130.008%28 Aug
dust213–9-0.049%28 Aug
anubis15–150.0311%27 Aug
ancient13–40.0712%27 Aug
anubis13–90.0615%26 Aug
dust24–13-0.0129%26 Aug
mirage11–130.0415%26 Aug
dust24–13-0.0338%25 Aug
dust29–130.0025%23 Aug
dust27–13-0.089%23 Aug
dust213–50.079%23 Aug
dust26–130.0619%23 Aug
dust24–13-0.0421%23 Aug
dust213–100.0716%23 Aug
dust210–13-0.039%23 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0124%21 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0320%21 Aug
dust213–110.0320%20 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0116%18 Aug
cache13–40.0819%17 Aug
anubis13–110.0714%17 Aug
anubis5–130.0216%17 Aug
dust26–20.0146%17 Aug
dust29–130.0324%17 Aug
anubis13–110.0113%15 Aug
nuke11–13-0.027%14 Aug
inferno0–13-0.0420%13 Aug
dust213–2-0.015%13 Aug
inferno13–40.1528%13 Aug
dust21–13-0.058%13 Aug
inferno13–60.0616%12 Aug
inferno13–110.0312%12 Aug
ancient13–20.1225%12 Aug
ancient13–50.0110%12 Aug
dust213–40.0611%12 Aug
anubis13–110.0520%12 Aug
dust211–10.0313%11 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0011%11 Aug
ancient8–13-0.039%11 Aug
dust213–70.077%11 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0116%10 Aug
ancient13–50.0516%10 Aug
dust213–50.0629%10 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0315%9 Aug
anubis13–10.0616%7 Aug
dust213–50.0410%6 Aug
dust210–130.0114%4 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0816%4 Aug
cache13–110.007%4 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0410%4 Aug
mirage16–140.0113%4 Aug
anubis15–150.0512%4 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0118%3 Aug
cache13–00.1819%3 Aug
dust211–130.0115%3 Aug
mirage4–130.017%3 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0214%3 Aug
dust215–150.0811%3 Aug
anubis10–130.0318%3 Aug
dust213–110.0012%31 Jul
mirage13–80.0112%31 Jul
mirage8–130.0618%31 Jul
dust213–16-0.047%31 Jul
mirage13–90.0417%31 Jul
anubis8–130.0211%28 Jul
ancient13–110.0513%27 Jul
dust213–11-0.0622%27 Jul
ancient13–40.0414%27 Jul
ancient10–130.036%27 Jul
ancient13–50.0312%27 Jul
dust213–4-0.0012%27 Jul
inferno11–130.0013%27 Jul
dust24–130.0215%26 Jul
nuke13–100.0114%26 Jul
mirage14–160.0713%25 Jul
cache13–11-0.0412%25 Jul
nuke13–60.0416%25 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0514%25 Jul
mirage13–90.006%24 Jul
dust213–7-0.0024%24 Jul
dust212–16-0.0417%24 Jul
mirage13–110.0310%24 Jul
dust21–5-0.068%24 Jul
anubis13–60.096%24 Jul
dust213–70.027%23 Jul
ancient13–70.0010%23 Jul
ancient13–80.047%23 Jul
dust213–8-0.055%23 Jul
mirage16–140.0517%23 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0220%23 Jul
dust23–13-0.0621%23 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0224%23 Jul
inferno6–130.0121%22 Jul
anubis11–130.0626%22 Jul
dust27–130.0222%21 Jul
mirage13–110.0412%21 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0115%21 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0810%20 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0015%20 Jul
ancient6–00.2521%20 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →