MakerOfTheBlackSword — CS2 Stats

76561198078035616[U:1:117769888]

447Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,058Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5921 of 18735 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMakerOfTheBlackSwordPREMIER22,058 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning56
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56431Last 10056%Win rateLWWLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.5
Aggression6.2
Utility5.2
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch5.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.6
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time517ms−109ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 517ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — cache 8–2
131Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28151354%0.01
dust2A26161062%0.00
anubisC125742%0.01
cacheA117464%-0.00
ancientS96367%0.01
nukeA85363%-0.01
inferno2020%-0.01
vertigo2020%-0.02
overpass220100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

265Matches
58%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
89.1ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1155%1.3718.3
Ancient771%1.0115.1
Dust2560%1.3219.6
Cache450%1.8817.3
Nuke3100%1.1510.7
Overpass1100%0.428.0
Anubis1100%2.1217.0
Vertigo10%0.8917.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
7.3°Preaim
526msReaction time
22.5%T opening success
54.5%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
8.78HE damage / grenade
5.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.4998% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–130.0122%27 Aug
dust213–70.0316%27 Aug
anubis13–30.129%27 Aug
dust20–2-0.010%27 Aug
dust212–3-0.0223%27 Aug
mirage13–90.0524%27 Aug
mirage13–100.0627%27 Aug
ancient13–30.048%27 Aug
dust210–130.0013%25 Aug
mirage8–130.0140%25 Aug
dust213–30.0516%25 Aug
ancient13–40.0616%23 Aug
dust28–130.0313%23 Aug
dust213–110.0319%23 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0129%23 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0327%22 Aug
cache13–110.0223%22 Aug
dust213–4-0.0116%21 Aug
dust213–80.0013%21 Aug
inferno9–130.0018%21 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0332%20 Aug
dust213–9-0.038%20 Aug
anubis11–13-0.029%20 Aug
mirage13–90.0018%20 Aug
mirage13–40.0128%20 Aug
anubis13–30.0613%19 Aug
mirage13–70.0021%18 Aug
dust213–60.0219%18 Aug
dust213–5-0.0320%18 Aug
dust210–130.0517%17 Aug
cache5–13-0.059%17 Aug
mirage5–130.0734%14 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0217%14 Aug
cache6–13-0.0218%14 Aug
ancient11–130.0323%14 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0122%13 Aug
dust215–150.0018%13 Aug
anubis13–110.0119%13 Aug
dust213–7-0.0017%13 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0317%9 Aug
dust26–130.0221%9 Aug
mirage13–70.0528%6 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0727%6 Aug
anubis6–13-0.079%4 Aug
dust28–130.0016%4 Aug
cache13–6-0.0221%4 Aug
ancient8–130.0316%3 Aug
nuke8–13-0.067%2 Aug
cache13–6-0.0316%2 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0221%2 Aug
cache13–8-0.1314%31 Jul
dust213–9-0.0138%31 Jul
ancient13–70.0129%31 Jul
mirage9–130.0116%31 Jul
dust213–70.0129%31 Jul
mirage8–130.0417%31 Jul
nuke13–70.0125%30 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0024%30 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0127%30 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0911%25 Jul
dust213–50.0031%25 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0021%23 Jul
cache2–13-0.0818%23 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0416%23 Jul
anubis13–100.0730%23 Jul
cache16–120.0431%19 Jul
vertigo5–9-0.0125%19 Jul
mirage2–13-0.1113%19 Jul
mirage13–4-0.039%29 Jun
dust26–13-0.0122%28 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0119%26 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0318%26 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0825%26 Jun
mirage13–60.0142%26 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0313%24 Jun
anubis13–50.0825%24 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0117%23 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0317%23 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0233%23 Jun
dust29–13-0.0225%23 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0239%22 Jun
cache13–60.0319%22 Jun
nuke13–1-0.0020%22 Jun
dust216–140.0321%22 Jun
mirage10–130.0816%21 Jun
nuke9–10.0922%21 Jun
overpass9–30.0619%21 Jun
cache8–20.2121%21 Jun
dust213–70.0322%21 Jun
dust213–11-0.0116%21 Jun
nuke13–70.0513%20 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0313%20 Jun
mirage13–110.0318%20 Jun
cache11–130.0317%20 Jun
mirage13–50.0838%19 Jun
dust26–13-0.0218%19 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0311%19 Jun
mirage10–130.0124%12 Jun
overpass13–9-0.0818%12 Jun
mirage13–80.0725%12 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →