Milkshake — CS2 Stats

76561198077547634[U:1:117281906]

530Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,277Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.1 Developing
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMilkshakeFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim34
Positioning42
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY632710Last 10063%Win rateWTWWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.4
Aggression2.7
Utility6.4
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 742ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.4
Positioning4.2
Utility6.4
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact9.3

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time749ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 764ms → last ⅓ avg 749ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.06Best rating — cache 13–8
131Biggest win — nuke
9Longest win streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 100% over 6anubisWeakest map · 47% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2415963%-0.04
infernoA1810856%-0.04
anubisB157847%-0.05
cacheS139469%-0.02
vertigoS660100%-0.05
ancientS54180%-0.03
nuke42250%-0.02
overpass440100%-0.03
mirage31233%-0.06
office32167%-0.03
train32167%0.01
boulder110100%-0.00
poseidon1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

73,064Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
4,214Matches
37.9%Match win rate
42.1%Headshot %
13.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
7,015MVPs
1,084Hours (in match)
3,379Bombs planted
1,841Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,708
SG 5532,404
AWP2,081
P2501,882
AUG1,509

Lifetime map wins

8,345dust2
3,324inferno
2,546vertigo
2,090nuke
698train
100cbble
96office
72ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2Matches
50%Win rate
0.80Avg K/D
ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
25.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.6%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
742msReaction time
15.8%T opening success
39.1%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
14.50HE damage / grenade
11.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 742.3125ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 15.7986% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–8-0.0321%17 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0611%16 Aug
dust213–9-0.0619%16 Aug
vertigo13–7-0.0311%13 Aug
dust213–9-0.037%13 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0618%9 Aug
dust22–13-0.0924%9 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0515%7 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0610%4 Aug
dust27–13-0.1017%4 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0612%3 Aug
boulder13–5-0.0021%2 Aug
dust213–3-0.0215%2 Aug
inferno13–100.0322%1 Aug
vertigo13–3-0.0312%1 Aug
ancient13–40.0014%29 Jul
vertigo13–4-0.0614%29 Jul
inferno13–2-0.0715%28 Jul
vertigo13–6-0.0511%27 Jul
cache13–7-0.0314%27 Jul
dust26–13-0.0225%27 Jul
inferno6–13-0.096%26 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0412%25 Jul
inferno13–2-0.043%25 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0416%23 Jul
anubis1–13-0.1018%23 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0617%22 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0821%21 Jul
nuke13–40.0419%21 Jul
dust213–11-0.0416%20 Jul
dust22–13-0.0518%20 Jul
dust213–4-0.0311%18 Jul
cache5–13-0.066%18 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0226%17 Jul
cache13–6-0.0523%17 Jul
dust213–70.008%16 Jul
cache13–5-0.0411%16 Jul
dust213–8-0.0917%15 Jul
vertigo13–7-0.0313%14 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0339%14 Jul
cache13–30.0120%14 Jul
dust213–2-0.0235%14 Jul
office8–13-0.0710%13 Jul
office13–3-0.0022%13 Jul
dust26–13-0.104%13 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0614%13 Jul
office13–3-0.0335%12 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0511%11 Jul
cache15–15-0.0317%10 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0114%10 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0817%9 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0122%9 Jul
cache13–40.0416%9 Jul
cache13–5-0.0218%7 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0521%7 Jul
nuke13–1-0.014%4 Jul
cache13–4-0.0124%4 Jul
cache5–13-0.0617%3 Jul
inferno8–13-0.079%30 Jun
dust213–5-0.0221%30 Jun
cache12–120.0018%30 Jun
inferno13–3-0.0114%30 Jun
dust211–130.0221%28 Jun
anubis14–16-0.0810%27 Jun
ancient13–60.0023%27 Jun
anubis16–12-0.029%26 Jun
overpass13–11-0.078%26 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0317%25 Jun
dust213–10.0132%25 Jun
anubis13–4-0.0612%25 Jun
vertigo13–4-0.077%23 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0710%22 Jun
dust215–15-0.0324%21 Jun
train10–13-0.0713%20 Jun
train13–40.0423%20 Jun
train9–00.0625%20 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0611%18 Jun
dust213–5-0.0710%18 Jun
anubis13–11-0.057%18 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0413%16 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0712%16 Jun
ancient13–2-0.0633%15 Jun
dust213–7-0.0120%14 Jun
cache13–80.0611%13 Jun
overpass13–30.0316%13 Jun
inferno13–30.0317%13 Jun
dust212–12-0.0520%12 Jun
dust213–8-0.0818%12 Jun
anubis13–3-0.019%10 Jun
cache13–8-0.038%9 Jun
poseidon8–80.0218%9 Jun
anubis7–13-0.077%9 Jun
dust211–13-0.0424%9 Jun
dust213–11-0.0419%8 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0615%8 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0624%8 Jun
dust213–7-0.0422%6 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0022%6 Jun
overpass13–6-0.0218%5 Jun
inferno2–9-0.2024%5 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →