yeedzuri — CS2 Stats

76561198076651923[U:1:116386195]✓ No bans

4,876Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,014Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2440 of 16237 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,327 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72

Positioning50

Utility26

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateLWWLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2

Aggression6.3

Utility2.6

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels2.0

Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2

Positioning5.0

Utility2.6

Mechanics4.0

Opening Duels2.0

Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time460ms−66ms

first ⅓ avg 526ms → last ⅓ avg 460ms

Headshot accuracy16.2%−1.2%

first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — nuke 9–5

13–2Biggest win — inferno

7Longest win streak

7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 86% over 7dust2Weakest map · 26% over 23

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	D	23	6–17	26%	0.01
mirage	S	21	16–5	76%	0.00
inferno	C	20	8–12	40%	0.02
cache	A	14	8–6	57%	0.03
nuke	B	8	4–4	50%	0.01
ancient	S	7	6–1	86%	-0.00
anubis	S	7	5–2	71%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (26% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,805Matches

51%Win rate

1.07Avg K/D

83.7ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	362	55%	1.00	15.9
Inferno	232	47%	1.10	17.0
Dust2	232	46%	1.01	16.3
Ancient	113	47%	1.00	16.3
Anubis	113	51%	1.08	16.9
Nuke	102	50%	0.99	15.9
Vertigo	62	52%	1.01	16.3
Overpass	39	56%	1.06	17.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy

34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.3%Spray accuracy

68.1%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

495msReaction time

31.7%T opening success

44.6%CT opening success

0.27Enemies flashed / flash

4.0%Flash assists

10.67HE damage / grenade

3.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.2744 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.7359% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

26% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	9–13	0.01	15%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	20%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	10%	26 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	19%	26 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.13	17%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.12	21%	25 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	21%	23 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.10	7%	23 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.02	20%	18 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.00	30%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.06	21%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	17%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.00	0%	15 Aug →
inferno	14–16	-0.02	13%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.00	0%	15 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.07	20%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.05	13%	15 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.07	8%	15 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.05	16%	15 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	16%	15 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.03	22%	15 Aug →
ancient	16–13	0.02	20%	13 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	27%	13 Aug →
anubis	14–16	-0.04	13%	13 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	20%	9 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.01	17%	9 Aug →
mirage	1–13	0.00	10%	9 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	9%	9 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	28%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	16%	8 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	20%	5 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.00	18%	4 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	14%	4 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.04	20%	4 Aug →
inferno	14–16	0.02	20%	3 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.06	11%	1 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.04	15%	1 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	25%	31 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	18%	30 Jul →
nuke	9–5	0.17	18%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	14%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.15	23%	30 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.02	15%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.04	28%	28 Jul →
cache	13–16	0.03	12%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	19%	27 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.03	17%	26 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.01	16%	26 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.11	13%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.00	22%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.05	19%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.05	26%	26 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	27%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.07	12%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.01	22%	25 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	31%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.07	39%	25 Jul →
cache	9–3	0.04	17%	25 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	19%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	12%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.12	12%	24 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.06	18%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.05	27%	23 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.01	20%	23 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.07	6%	22 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.04	17%	20 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.01	22%	20 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.09	23%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.07	14%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	5%	20 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.02	12%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.07	14%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.07	29%	20 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.03	18%	20 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	12%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.04	11%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.04	15%	19 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.02	24%	19 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.06	21%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.06	14%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.09	17%	19 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	22%	19 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.02	23%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.06	20%	19 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.03	25%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	11%	18 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.03	16%	18 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.08	27%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.07	26%	18 Jul →
mirage	16–12	-0.01	15%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	20%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	15%	18 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.06	14%	17 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.00	15%	17 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	22%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.04	15%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	14%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.01	19%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.01	11%	15 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.09	16%	15 Jul →