Sugar

Sugar — CS2 Stats

76561198073050962[U:1:112785234]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

831Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,383Hours in CS37Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.3 Developing
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,001 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,022), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate38.3%46.2%47.2%8.9% short
Shot accuracy6.5%12.5%12.3%5.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.911.061.070.16 short
Match win rate38.0%45.9%46.3%8.3% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 8 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSugarFACEITLevel 7 · 1,001 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning54
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47503Last 10047%Win rateWWLLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.7
Aggression4.6
Utility6.2
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 60% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning5.4
Utility6.2
Mechanics2.2
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time542ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — dust2 13–1
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
128In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A30171357%0.01
mirageB1910953%-0.01
anubisD103730%-0.00
cacheD103730%0.02
nukeC94544%0.01
ancientC83538%0.01
infernoS64267%-0.00
train2020%0.02
vertigo220100%-0.03
office110100%-0.02
shelter1010%0.04
fachwerk1010%-0.06
boulder1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

39,407Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
1,911Matches
38.0%Match win rate
38.3%Headshot %
6.5%Shot accuracy
3,067MVPs
1,590Hours (in match)
1,895Bombs planted
356Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,130
AWP3,232
MP91,386
MP71,327
P2501,005
P90996

Lifetime map wins

4,196dust2
2,022nuke
1,469inferno
504office
336vertigo
258train
196cbble
75lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

278Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
73.3ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust26958%1.1014.8
Inferno5151%0.9914.2
Mirage4639%0.9514.4
Nuke3650%1.0714.3
Ancient3050%1.1816.5
Anubis2454%1.0314.8
Overpass1136%0.7714.3
Cache933%0.7812.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.7%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
59.9%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
536msReaction time
35.3%T opening success
28.8%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
6.13HE damage / grenade
19.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.714% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.3422% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust222–200.0414%28 Aug
mirage13–110.0317%28 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0812%28 Aug
dust211–130.0420%28 Aug
dust24–13-0.0112%28 Aug
cache10–130.0511%27 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0225%27 Aug
dust213–9-0.019%27 Aug
dust213–100.0322%27 Aug
dust213–11-0.0215%26 Aug
dust213–11-0.0416%26 Aug
mirage12–20.0427%26 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0123%25 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0110%25 Aug
nuke10–13-0.058%25 Aug
dust210–13-0.0215%25 Aug
anubis9–13-0.068%25 Aug
dust213–10.1724%25 Aug
mirage13–60.058%25 Aug
dust213–110.0415%18 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0310%18 Aug
dust26–13-0.0114%17 Aug
dust213–90.0625%16 Aug
train7–130.0320%16 Aug
dust213–20.0613%16 Aug
inferno13–9-0.044%15 Aug
inferno13–90.0216%15 Aug
dust29–130.0318%15 Aug
dust22–13-0.1118%15 Aug
mirage8–13-0.072%15 Aug
dust222–180.0217%14 Aug
nuke13–50.0720%14 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0213%13 Aug
dust213–7-0.0713%13 Aug
dust27–130.0125%13 Aug
nuke13–100.0921%13 Aug
inferno5–13-0.056%13 Aug
anubis11–130.0314%12 Aug
mirage13–90.0511%12 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0317%12 Aug
dust216–140.0117%12 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0113%12 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0913%12 Aug
vertigo13–8-0.0210%10 Aug
dust210–13-0.0727%8 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0313%8 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0113%8 Aug
mirage13–7-0.003%7 Aug
dust213–90.0217%7 Aug
anubis10–130.0917%6 Aug
cache4–13-0.0615%6 Aug
dust213–30.0711%6 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0212%5 Aug
vertigo13–11-0.0418%5 Aug
nuke13–80.0320%5 Aug
ancient13–50.0516%5 Aug
nuke9–130.0110%4 Aug
ancient13–70.0312%4 Aug
ancient6–130.0116%4 Aug
cache8–130.0615%3 Aug
dust26–13-0.0521%3 Aug
cache12–12-0.0213%2 Aug
dust28–13-0.0612%31 Jul
dust213–60.0016%31 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0114%30 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0517%29 Jul
nuke13–100.0313%29 Jul
cache10–13-0.0015%28 Jul
anubis12–120.0413%27 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0215%23 Jul
inferno13–110.0917%22 Jul
dust211–13-0.0113%21 Jul
mirage12–160.0623%21 Jul
cache13–110.0722%21 Jul
nuke9–130.0014%21 Jul
cache8–130.0618%17 Jul
dust213–100.0421%17 Jul
office13–1-0.0223%17 Jul
dust212–120.0123%16 Jul
dust213–90.0922%16 Jul
dust23–13-0.0322%16 Jul
inferno16–12-0.0124%14 Jul
anubis13–70.0213%14 Jul
ancient11–130.0614%14 Jul
cache13–90.0219%14 Jul
shelter2–130.0416%12 Jul
fachwerk4–13-0.0615%12 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0226%11 Jul
cache13–60.0313%11 Jul
train11–130.0117%11 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0615%11 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0113%11 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0421%10 Jul
mirage21–25-0.0117%10 Jul
boulder5–130.0014%9 Jul
mirage9–130.018%9 Jul
mirage16–14-0.055%9 Jul
mirage13–50.0317%8 Jul
mirage13–8-0.029%8 Jul
cache9–13-0.0411%8 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →