Floridian Swamp Cats — CS2 Stats
76561198069095540[U:1:108829812]✓ No bans
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Strong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity
Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.
Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower opening-fight frequency.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.5° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 13% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 660ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 51 | 28–23 | 55% | -0.00 | |
| S | 11 | 8–3 | 73% | 0.00 | |
| A | 10 | 6–4 | 60% | -0.02 | |
| A | 9 | 5–4 | 56% | -0.01 | |
| D | 8 | 2–6 | 25% | -0.02 | |
| D | 6 | 2–4 | 33% | 0.00 | |
| — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | 0.01 | |
| — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.04 | |
| — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | -0.04 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ancient | 6 | 83% | 1.28 | 15.8 |
| Anubis | 2 | 100% | 0.70 | 8.5 |
| Mirage | 2 | 50% | 1.46 | 18.0 |
| Vertigo | 1 | 100% | 1.13 | 35.0 |
| Inferno | 1 | 0% | 0.65 | 11.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Best CS2 CrosshairAim Training →
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.8447% — below the 15% mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 13.2601% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13–16 | -0.00 | 20% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.04 | 20% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 9% | 19 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.04 | 22% | 10 Jul → | ||
| 12–16 | -0.04 | 18% | 9 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.03 | 9% | 7 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 14% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 12–12 | -0.06 | 14% | 5 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.02 | 12% | 4 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.04 | 16% | 4 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.03 | 21% | 3 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.05 | 13% | 3 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.02 | 16% | 2 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.10 | 16% | 1 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.03 | 27% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.02 | 16% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.06 | 6% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.04 | 8% | 20 Jun → | ||
| 13–1 | -0.02 | 15% | 20 Jun → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.01 | 9% | 19 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.08 | 20% | 18 Jun → | ||
| 3–7 | -0.06 | 18% | 17 Jun → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.02 | 11% | 16 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.11 | 13% | 16 Jun → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.14 | 15% | 15 Jun → | ||
| 0–3 | -0.03 | 20% | 15 Jun → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.02 | 12% | 15 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.03 | 11% | 14 Jun → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.03 | 17% | 12 Jun → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.03 | 14% | 11 Jun → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.05 | 13% | 9 Jun → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.08 | 12% | 7 Jun → | ||
| 6–0 | -0.04 | 14% | 7 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.04 | 12% | 6 Jun → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.09 | 5% | 6 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.05 | 13% | 5 Jun → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.02 | 18% | 4 Jun → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.03 | 6% | 3 Jun → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.01 | 10% | 2 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.01 | 21% | 31 May → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.06 | 13% | 30 May → | ||
| 13–4 | -0.05 | 22% | 27 May → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.02 | 10% | 25 May → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.08 | 15% | 25 May → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 12% | 24 May → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.03 | 17% | 23 May → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.05 | 19% | 22 May → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.02 | 19% | 17 May → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.01 | 16% | 15 May → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.05 | 23% | 14 May → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.03 | 13% | 13 May → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.05 | 22% | 11 May → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.06 | 26% | 9 May → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.04 | 17% | 7 May → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 10% | 5 May → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.00 | 17% | 4 May → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.06 | 25% | 1 May → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.00 | 13% | 28 Apr → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.07 | 8% | 25 Apr → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.03 | 16% | 24 Apr → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.04 | 17% | 24 Apr → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.12 | 29% | 19 Apr → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.11 | 19% | 18 Apr → | ||
| 1–9 | -0.08 | 0% | 13 Apr → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.01 | 14% | 13 Apr → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.01 | 13% | 12 Apr → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.02 | 16% | 2 Jan → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.02 | 25% | 2 Jan → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.02 | 12% | 9 Jul → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.07 | 22% | 9 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.05 | 4% | 5 Apr → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.05 | 26% | 3 Apr → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.06 | 12% | 2 Apr → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.01 | 9% | 1 Apr → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.10 | 11% | 27 Mar → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.02 | 13% | 26 Mar → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.01 | 23% | 1 Dec → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.08 | 16% | 20 Nov → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.08 | 20% | 19 Nov → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.03 | 11% | 28 May → | ||
| 4–7 | 0.01 | 17% | 3 May → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.03 | 18% | 28 Apr → | ||
| 12–12 | -0.05 | 10% | 27 Apr → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.04 | 14% | 27 Apr → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.01 | 7% | 27 Apr → | ||
| 2–9 | -0.08 | 13% | 27 Apr → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.00 | 18% | 14 Apr → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.01 | 13% | 9 Apr → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.04 | 12% | 8 Apr → | ||
| 1–9 | -0.07 | 16% | 7 Apr → | ||
| 12–3 | -0.03 | 20% | 5 Apr → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.08 | 13% | 31 Mar → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.04 | 19% | 30 Mar → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.04 | 9% | 29 Mar → | ||
| 12–12 | -0.03 | 12% | 27 Mar → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.02 | 27% | 8 Mar → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.08 | 29% | 12 Feb → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.04 | 15% | 10 Feb → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.03 | 35% | 9 Feb → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.02 | 18% | 8 Feb → |
Match data via Leetify.