Bendmydik Completelyback — CS2 Stats

76561198067413064[U:1:107147336]✓ No bans

1,471Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,811Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6550 of 20007 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBendmydik CompletelybackFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER21,811 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning51
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT60391Last 10060%Win rateWLWWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.3
Aggression7.3
Utility7.4
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch6.4

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.1
Utility7.4
Mechanics9.3
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time574ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy26.7%+5.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 26.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — nuke 13–3
132Biggest win — anubis
8Longest win streak
139In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 50% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A36221461%-0.01
mirageA2314961%-0.00
nukeB158753%-0.01
infernoS96367%0.00
anubisB84450%-0.02
cacheS64267%0.01
ancient21150%-0.02
office110100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

74Matches
53%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
73.8ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1753%1.2014.1
Anubis1346%0.8917.8
Vertigo862%0.9914.6
Dust2757%1.1218.4
Inferno450%1.0616.5
Nuke475%1.1512.0
Ancient250%0.8312.5
Overpass10%1.3328.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.6%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
92.0%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
579msReaction time
32.8%T opening success
55.8%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
12.6%Flash assists
17.06HE damage / grenade
14.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.7703% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–100.0326%26 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0314%23 Aug
nuke9–00.0042%23 Aug
dust213–11-0.0626%17 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0215%17 Aug
dust213–4-0.0326%17 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0332%16 Aug
dust27–13-0.0432%16 Aug
nuke13–110.0124%15 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0338%15 Aug
cache13–6-0.024%15 Aug
dust211–13-0.0124%15 Aug
dust28–13-0.0226%13 Aug
dust211–13-0.0636%13 Aug
cache8–13-0.0423%11 Aug
dust213–100.1023%11 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0413%7 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0340%7 Aug
inferno13–40.0612%6 Aug
dust213–10-0.0112%6 Aug
mirage13–80.0021%5 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0016%3 Aug
inferno0–13-0.1050%3 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0730%2 Aug
dust213–9-0.0328%30 Jul
mirage13–100.0325%30 Jul
dust24–13-0.0629%28 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0150%28 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0335%27 Jul
mirage13–90.0122%27 Jul
ancient13–110.0221%26 Jul
dust213–110.0231%26 Jul
cache13–30.1536%25 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0231%25 Jul
dust213–80.0333%24 Jul
dust213–50.0327%24 Jul
dust23–11-0.0220%24 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0420%24 Jul
dust213–3-0.0131%24 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0332%24 Jul
cache13–80.0131%23 Jul
dust211–130.0013%22 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0318%21 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0815%21 Jul
mirage14–160.0424%14 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0128%13 Jul
dust25–13-0.0616%12 Jul
cache7–0-0.0027%12 Jul
cache5–13-0.0230%8 Jul
dust213–7-0.0118%7 Jul
dust24–13-0.119%6 Jul
nuke13–100.0032%6 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0828%2 Jul
mirage13–70.0124%1 Jul
mirage13–90.0020%1 Jul
nuke16–140.0422%1 Jul
mirage13–100.0437%30 Jun
dust213–8-0.0521%30 Jun
dust213–90.0132%29 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0643%28 Jun
anubis13–2-0.0322%28 Jun
inferno16–140.0526%28 Jun
mirage15–150.0312%27 Jun
dust213–110.0228%27 Jun
nuke13–30.2040%27 Jun
dust213–6-0.0636%25 Jun
inferno13–40.0639%24 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0518%24 Jun
dust213–70.0517%21 Jun
dust214–16-0.0419%2 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0120%21 May
inferno5–130.0219%21 May
dust213–110.0416%18 May
dust29–13-0.0723%18 May
nuke11–13-0.0312%18 May
mirage1–13-0.028%17 May
anubis9–13-0.0710%17 May
dust213–9-0.0124%17 May
dust213–40.0923%16 May
nuke6–13-0.0711%16 May
mirage13–20.1226%16 May
dust213–80.0529%16 May
nuke8–13-0.0614%14 May
mirage13–6-0.0226%14 May
nuke11–13-0.0010%9 May
anubis13–60.0630%9 May
dust211–13-0.0420%9 May
dust213–90.0328%9 May
dust210–13-0.0623%7 May
office13–50.0023%7 May
dust213–20.0219%6 May
mirage13–110.0325%5 May
mirage13–90.0127%5 May
dust25–13-0.0245%5 May
nuke13–60.0221%4 May
mirage7–13-0.0118%4 May
mirage2–13-0.0819%3 May
anubis13–80.0121%3 May
mirage13–90.0120%3 May
nuke13–6-0.0224%3 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →